Claude Code transcript - page 1/1

Please continue with the work previously tackled to get the transpiler to cleanly and correctly process the course module/library.

Let me start by understanding the current state of the project and what's needed to make progress on the course module transpilation.

Task
Explore current state of course module
{
  "subagent_type": "Explore",
  "prompt": "Explore the current state of the occam2go transpiler's ability to process the course module. Do the following:\n\n1. Read the TODO.md file to understand what's planned/remaining\n2. Look at the course_nofloat.module file to understand what it includes\n3. Run: `cd /home/david/projects/code-associates/occam2go && go build -o occam2go . && ./occam2go -I kroc/modules/course/libsrc -D TARGET.BITS.PER.WORD=32 -o /tmp/course_out.go course_nofloat.module 2>&1` to see the current error state\n4. If there are errors, examine what constructs are failing\n5. Also check the full course.module file at kroc/modules/course/libsrc/course.module\n\nReport back: What specific errors occur? What language constructs need to be implemented or fixed?"
}
[
  {
    "type": "text",
    "text": "Excellent! Now let me write up my findings in a comprehensive report.\n\n## Summary\n\nI've explored the current state of the occam2go transpiler's ability to process the course module. Here's what I found:\n\n### Current Status\n\n**course_nofloat.module** - **WORKS PERFECTLY**\n- Transpiles without any errors\n- Successfully includes: consts.inc, utils.occ, string.occ, demo_cycles.occ, demo_nets.occ, file_in.occ, random.occ\n\n**Full course.module** - **FAILS** due to float_io.occ\n- Contains references to /home/david/projects/code-associates/occam2go/kroc/modules/course/libsrc/float_io.occ\n\n### Specific Errors and Missing Language Features\n\nThe float_io.occ file contains **88 total references** to unimplemented language features. Here's the breakdown:\n\n#### **1. RETYPES (2 occurrences)**\n- **What it is**: Type punning / bit-level type reinterpretation\n- **Example** (line 139): `VAL INT X RETYPES X :`\n- **What it does**: Reinterprets the bit pattern of one type as another type\n- **Go equivalent**: Would need `math.Float32frombits()`, `Float64bits()`, or unsafe pointer casts\n\n#### **2. Transputer Intrinsic Functions (88 - 2 = 86 occurrences total)**\n\nThese are extended-precision arithmetic functions needed for float-to-string conversion:\n\n- **LONGPROD (12 occurrences)** - Extended-precision multiplication returning (high, low)\n  - Example: `Zfrac, Carry := LONGPROD (PowerTenFrac[St], Xfrac, Carry)`\n  \n- **LONGDIV (7 occurrences)** - Extended-precision division\n  - Example: `Xfrac, Carry := LONGDIV (Xfrac >> 1, 0, Zfrac)`\n  \n- **LONGSUM (23 occurrences)** - Extended-precision addition\n  - Example: `Carry, Xfrac := LONGSUM (Xfrac, 1, 0)`\n  \n- **LONGDIFF (15 occurrences)** - Extended-precision subtraction\n  - Example: `Borrow, dummy := LONGDIFF (Carry, Zfrac >> 1, 0)`\n  \n- **NORMALISE (6 occurrences)** - Normalize extended-precision numbers\n  - Example: `Places, Xfrac, Carry := NORMALISE (Xfrac, Carry)`\n  \n- **SHIFTRIGHT (10 occurrences)** & **SHIFTLEFT (11 occurrences)** - Bit shifting operations\n  - These work on extended-precision values\n  \n- **CAUSEERROR() (2 occurrences)** - Error-raising primitive\n  - Would map to `panic(\"CAUSEERROR\")`\n\n### Other Observations\n\n1. **Identifiers with dots** - The lexer ALREADY supports dots in identifiers (e.g., `round.direction`, `decimal.point`, `max.no.of.zeroes.before.first.significant.digit`), so these work fine\n\n2. **Variable names with dots and numbers** - The transpiler handles identifiers like `Buf.1`, `Places.1`, `LogX.1` correctly via the lexer's readIdentifier function\n\n3. **#PRAGMA DEFINED** - The preprocessor correctly ignores these directives by converting them to blank lines\n\n### Files Involved\n\n- **Full course module**: `/home/david/projects/code-associates/occam2go/kroc/modules/course/libsrc/course.module`\n- **Working version**: `/home/david/projects/code-associates/occam2go/course_nofloat.module`\n- **Problematic file**: `/home/david/projects/code-associates/occam2go/kroc/modules/course/libsrc/float_io.occ` (2261 lines)\n\n### What Needs to Be Implemented\n\nTo fully support the course module, the following features must be added (in order of occurrences/priority):\n\n1. **LONGSUM** - 23 occurrences (Highest priority - most used)\n2. **LONGDIFF** - 15 occurrences\n3. **LONGPROD** - 12 occurrences\n4. **SHIFTLEFT** - 11 occurrences\n5. **SHIFTRIGHT** - 10 occurrences\n6. **LONGDIV** - 7 occurrences\n7. **NORMALISE** - 6 occurrences\n8. **RETYPES** - 2 occurrences\n9. **CAUSEERROR()** - 2 occurrences\n\nThese are all pre-existing items in the TODO.md file and marked as Phase 2 work."
  },
  {
    "type": "text",
    "text": "agentId: ab726b9 (for resuming to continue this agent's work if needed)\n<usage>total_tokens: 46774\ntool_uses: 55\nduration_ms: 223647</usage>"
  }
]
Thinking

So the course_nofloat.module already works. The next step is to tackle Phase 2: implementing the features needed for float_io.occ. Let me check if there are any other issues with the current output first, then plan the implementation of the Phase 2 features.

Let me first check the current state more carefully: 1. Does course_nofloat.module transpile AND pass go vet? 2. What does float_io.occ look like exactly? 3. What's the current error when trying to transpile with float_io.occ?

Let me look at the specific errors and then plan the implementation.

Good - the course_nofloat.module already transpiles cleanly. The remaining work is Phase 2: implementing the features needed for float_io.occ. Let me look at the specific constructs and current error state more closely.

$ Bash
Try transpiling full course module to see errors
go build -o occam2go . && ./occam2go -I kroc/modules/course/libsrc -D TARGET.BITS.PER.WORD=32 -o /tmp/course_full.go kroc/modules/course/libsrc/course.module 2>&1 | head -50
Parse errors:
  line 2097: expected IS, got IDENT
  line 2097: unexpected token: :
  line 2101: expected type after VAL, got IDENT
  line 2101: unexpected token: IS
  line 2101: unexpected token: INT
  line 2101: unexpected token: :
  line 2102: expected type after VAL, got IDENT
  line 2102: unexpected token: IS
  line 2102: unexpected token: INT
  line 2102: unexpected token: :
  line 2103: expected type after VAL, got IDENT
  line 2103: unexpected token: IS
  line 2103: unexpected token: INT
  line 2103: unexpected token: :
  line 2104: expected type after VAL, got IDENT
  line 2104: unexpected token: IS
  line 2104: unexpected token: INT
  line 2104: unexpected token: :
  line 2107: expected type after VAL, got IDENT
  line 2107: unexpected token: IS
  line 2107: unexpected token: INT
  line 2107: unexpected token: :
  line 2108: expected type after VAL, got IDENT
  line 2108: unexpected token: IS
  line 2108: unexpected token: INT
  line 2108: unexpected token: :
  line 2109: expected type after VAL, got IDENT
  line 2109: unexpected token: IS
  line 2109: unexpected token: INT
  line 2109: unexpected token: :
  line 2110: expected type after VAL, got IDENT
  line 2110: unexpected token: IS
  line 2110: unexpected token: INT
  line 2110: unexpected token: :
  line 2111: expected type after VAL, got IDENT
  line 2111: unexpected token: IS
  line 2111: unexpected token: INT
  line 2111: unexpected token: :
  line 2112: expected type after VAL, got IDENT
  line 2112: unexpected token: IS
  line 2112: unexpected token: INT
  line 2112: unexpected token: :
  line 2113: expected type after VAL, got IDENT
  line 2113: unexpected token: IS
  line 2113: unexpected token: INT
  line 2113: unexpected token: :
  line 2117: expected type after VAL, got IDENT
  line 2117: unexpected token: IS
  line 2117: unexpected token: INT
Read
{
  "file_path": "/home/david/projects/code-associates/occam2go/kroc/modules/course/libsrc/float_io.occ",
  "limit": 100
}
     1→--
     2→--	Type conversion library
     3→--	Copyright (C) 1988, 1990  Inmos Limited
     4→--
     5→--	This library is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
     6→--	modify it under the terms of the GNU Lesser General Public
     7→--	License as published by the Free Software Foundation; either
     8→--	version 2 of the License, or (at your option) any later version.
     9→--
    10→--	This library is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
    11→--	but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
    12→--	MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.  See the GNU
    13→--	Lesser General Public License for more details.
    14→--
    15→--	You should have received a copy of the GNU Lesser General Public
    16→--	License along with this library; if not, write to the Free Software
    17→--	Foundation, Inc., 59 Temple Place, Suite 330, Boston, MA 02111-1307  USA
    18→--
    19→
    20→--** @module course
    21→
    22→--{{{  #'s
    23→-- #OPTION "E V" -- no compiler libraries, no vector space
    24→#COMMENT "Type conversion library V1.6 4/12/90"
    25→#COMMENT "(C) Copyright INMOS limited 1988, 1990"
    26→--}}}
    27→
    28→--{{{  REAL32TOSTRING
    29→--* Format a [@code REAL32] number as a decimal string.
    30→--
    31→-- [@code Ip] and [@code Dp] control how the number is formatted.
    32→-- If [@code Ip > 0] and [@code Dp > 0], fixed-point format will be used with
    33→-- [@code Ip] digits before the point and [@code Dp] digits after the point.
    34→-- If [@code Ip = 0] and [@code Dp > 0], exponential format will be used with
    35→-- [@code Dp] digits in the fraction.
    36→-- If [@code Ip = 0] and [@code Dp = 0], a "reasonable" format will be chosen
    37→-- automatically.
    38→--
    39→-- @param len The number of characters ([@code BYTE]s) of string occupied by
    40→--   the formatted decimal representation of the real number
    41→-- @param string An array containing the formatted decimal representation of
    42→--   the real number in the first [@code len] bytes, the remaining bytes being
    43→--   undefined
    44→-- @param X The real number, in IEEE format, to be converted
    45→-- @param Ip The first of two formatting values
    46→-- @param Dp The second of two formatting values
    47→PROC course.REAL32TOSTRING (RESULT INT len, RESULT []BYTE string, VAL REAL32 X, VAL INT Ip, Dp)
    48→
    49→  --{{{  specification
    50→  --{{{  Notes
    51→  -- Notes:    Rounding mode is round to nearest.
    52→  --           Which format is used depends on the combination of values
    53→  --           of Ip, Dp and X.  In all cases, any digits beyond the 9th
    54→  --           significant digit for single precision or 17th significant
    55→  --           digit for double precision will be given as 0 and cannot
    56→  --           be considered accurate.
    57→  --           If string overflows this routine acts as an invalid process.
    58→  --{{{  Case i
    59→  -- Case (i):    Ip = 0, Dp = 0  => free format
    60→  --           Where possible a fixed point representation is used.  If
    61→  --           it is not used then exponential form is used.  It is not
    62→  --           used if more than 9 | 17 significant digits of accuracy
    63→  --           ( single | double ) would be required before the decimal
    64→  --           point, or if there are more than 3 zeroes after the decimal
    65→  --           point before the first significant digit.  In any case, the
    66→  --           maximum number of characters returned in string is 15 for a
    67→  --           single precision X, and 24 for a double precision X.
    68→  --           string is left justified.
    69→  --           If X is infinity or a NaN, then the string will contain one
    70→  --           of "Inf", "-Inf" or "NaN", but not the quotes.
    71→  --}}}
    72→  --{{{  Case ii
    73→  -- Case (ii):   Ip = 0, Dp > 0  => exponential format
    74→  --           The form of exponential format is, firstly either a minus
    75→  --           sign or a space ( this latter instead of an explicit plus
    76→  --           sign ), a fraction in the form <digit>.<digits>, the
    77→  --           exponential symbol ( E ), the sign of the exponent ( + or
    78→  --           - ), then the exponent, which is two digits for a single
    79→  --           precision X, three digits for a double precision X.  Dp
    80→  --           gives the number of digits in the fraction ( 1 before the
    81→  --           point, and the others after, but not counting the point ).
    82→  --           The total number of characters in string is ( Dp + 6 )
    83→  --           for a single precision X, and ( Dp + 7 ) for a double
    84→  --           precision X.
    85→  --           If Dp = 1 then the fraction is of the form <space>digit
    86→  --           ( which, note, will not result in occam syntax for the
    87→  --           real ).
    88→  --           If X is infinity or a NaN, then the string will contain one
    89→  --           of " Inf", "-Inf" or " NaN", but not the quotes, padded on
    90→  --           the right to fill the field width.
    91→  --}}}
    92→  --{{{  Case iii
    93→  -- Case (iii):  Ip > 0, Dp > 0  => fixed point if possible
    94→  --           Ip gives the number of places before the point, not
    95→  --           counting the sign place; Dp the number of places after
    96→  --           the point.  Padding spaces are added on the left as
    97→  --           necessary.  If the number will not fit the format,
    98→  --           then an exponential format is used with the same field
    99→  --           width as the fixed point representation would have had.
   100→  --           If Ip and Dp are very small then an exponential
Read
{
  "file_path": "/home/david/projects/code-associates/occam2go/TODO.md"
}
     1→# occam2go — Implementation Status
     2→
     3→## Fully Implemented
     4→
     5→### Core Constructs
     6→- **SEQ** — Sequential execution, with replicators (`SEQ i = 0 FOR n`) and optional STEP
     7→- **PAR** — Parallel execution via goroutines + sync.WaitGroup, with replicators
     8→- **IF** — Multi-branch conditionals, maps to if/else if chains, with replicators; supports multi-statement bodies (declarations scoped before process)
     9→- **WHILE** — Loops, maps to Go `for` loops; supports multi-statement bodies
    10→- **CASE** — Pattern matching with multiple cases and ELSE branch; supports multi-statement bodies
    11→- **ALT** — Channel alternation, maps to Go `select`; supports boolean guards, timer timeouts, and multi-statement bodies
    12→- **SKIP** — No-op process
    13→- **STOP** — Error + deadlock
    14→
    15→### Data Types & Declarations
    16→- **INT, BYTE, BOOL, REAL, REAL32, REAL64** — Scalar types (REAL/REAL64 map to float64, REAL32 maps to float32)
    17→- **Variable declarations** — `INT x, y, z:`
    18→- **Arrays** — `[n]TYPE arr:` with index expressions
    19→- **Channels** — `CHAN OF TYPE c:` with send (`!`) and receive (`?`); `CHAN BYTE` shorthand (without `OF`)
    20→- **Channel arrays** — `[n]CHAN OF TYPE cs:` with indexed send/receive and `[]CHAN OF TYPE` proc params
    21→- **Channel direction** — `CHAN OF INT c?` (receive-only) and `CHAN OF INT c!` (send-only); direction annotations at call sites (`out!`, `in?`) accepted and ignored
    22→- **Timers** — `TIMER tim:` with reads and `AFTER` expressions
    23→- **Abbreviations** — `VAL INT x IS 1:`, `INT y IS z:` — named constants and aliases
    24→- **INITIAL declarations** — `INITIAL INT x IS 42:` — mutable variables with initial values
    25→- **Byte literals** — `'A'`, `'0'` with occam escape sequences (`*n`, `*c`, `*t`)
    26→- **Hex integer literals** — `#FF`, `#80000000`
    27→
    28→### Procedures & Functions
    29→- **PROC** — Declaration with VAL, reference, CHAN OF, and open array (`[]TYPE`) parameters
    30→- **PROC calls** — With automatic `&`/`*` for reference params, pass-through for channels
    31→- **FUNCTION (IS form)** — `INT FUNCTION square(VAL INT x) IS x * x`
    32→- **FUNCTION (VALOF form)** — Local declarations + VALOF body + RESULT
    33→- **Multi-result FUNCTIONs** — `INT, INT FUNCTION f(...)` returning multiple values via `RESULT a, b`
    34→- **Nested PROCs/FUNCTIONs** — Local definitions inside a PROC body, compiled as Go closures
    35→- **KRoC-style colon terminators** — Optional `:` at end of PROC/FUNCTION body
    36→- **Built-in print** — `print.int`, `print.bool`, `print.string`, `print.newline`
    37→
    38→### Expressions & Operators
    39→- **Arithmetic** — `+`, `-`, `*`, `/`, `\` (modulo)
    40→- **Comparison** — `=`, `<>`, `<`, `>`, `<=`, `>=`
    41→- **Logical** — `AND`, `OR`, `NOT`
    42→- **Bitwise** — `/\`, `\/`, `><`, `~`, `<<`, `>>`
    43→- **AFTER** — As boolean expression (maps to `>`)
    44→- **Parenthesized expressions**
    45→- **Array indexing** — `arr[i]`, `arr[expr]`
    46→- **String literals** — Double-quoted strings
    47→- **Type conversions** — `INT expr`, `BYTE expr`, `REAL32 expr`, `REAL64 expr`
    48→- **Checked arithmetic** — `PLUS`, `MINUS`, `TIMES` — modular (wrapping) operators
    49→- **MOSTNEG/MOSTPOS** — Type min/max constants for INT, BYTE, REAL32, REAL64
    50→- **SIZE operator** — `SIZE arr`, `SIZE "str"` maps to `len()`
    51→- **Array slices** — `[arr FROM n FOR m]` with slice assignment
    52→- **Multi-assignment** — `a, b := f(...)` including indexed targets like `x[0], x[1] := x[1], x[0]`
    53→
    54→### Protocols
    55→- **Simple** — `PROTOCOL SIG IS INT` (type alias)
    56→- **Sequential** — `PROTOCOL PAIR IS INT ; BYTE` (struct)
    57→- **Variant** — `PROTOCOL MSG CASE tag; TYPE ...` (interface + concrete types)
    58→
    59→### Records
    60→- **RECORD** — Struct types with field access via bracket syntax (`p[x]`)
    61→
    62→### Preprocessor
    63→- **`#IF` / `#ELSE` / `#ENDIF`** — Conditional compilation with `TRUE`, `FALSE`, `DEFINED()`, `NOT`, equality
    64→- **`#DEFINE`** — Symbol definition
    65→- **`#INCLUDE`** — File inclusion with search paths and include guards
    66→- **`#COMMENT` / `#PRAGMA` / `#USE`** — Ignored (blank lines)
    67→- **Predefined symbols** — `TARGET.BITS.PER.WORD = 64`
    68→
    69→### Tooling
    70→- **gen-module** — Generate `.module` files from KRoC SConscript build files
    71→
    72→---
    73→
    74→## Not Yet Implemented
    75→
    76→### Required for shared_screen module (extends course module)
    77→
    78→| Feature | Notes | Used in |
    79→|---------|-------|---------|
    80→| **`DATA TYPE X IS TYPE:`** | Simple type alias (e.g. `DATA TYPE COLOUR IS BYTE:`). | shared_screen.inc |
    81→| **`DATA TYPE X RECORD`** | Alternative record syntax (vs current `RECORD X`). | shared_screen.inc |
    82→| **Counted array protocol** | `BYTE::[]BYTE` — length-prefixed array in protocols. | shared_screen.inc, shared_screen.occ |
    83→| **`RESULT` param qualifier** | `RESULT INT len` on PROC params (output-only, like a write-only reference). | float_io.occ |
    84→
    85→### Other language features
    86→
    87→| Feature | Notes |
    88→|---------|-------|
    89→| **PRI ALT / PRI PAR** | Priority variants of ALT and PAR. |
    90→| **PLACED PAR** | Assigning processes to specific hardware. |
    91→| **PORT OF** | Hardware port mapping. |
    92→| **`RETYPES`** | Type punning / reinterpret cast (`VAL INT X RETYPES X :`). Used in float_io.occ. |
    93→| **`CAUSEERROR ()`** | Built-in error-raising primitive. Used in float_io.occ. |
    94→| **Transputer intrinsics** | `LONGPROD`, `LONGDIV`, `LONGSUM`, `LONGDIFF`, `NORMALISE`, `SHIFTLEFT`, `SHIFTRIGHT`. Used in float_io.occ. |
    95→| **`VAL []BYTE` abbreviations** | `VAL []BYTE cmap IS "0123456789ABCDEF":` — named string constants. |
    96→| **`#PRAGMA DEFINED`** | Compiler hint to suppress definedness warnings. Can be ignored. |
    97→
Thinking

Let me understand the errors better. The errors are at line 2097+ of the preprocessed output. Let me look at what's on those lines in float_io.occ around those line numbers. But wait - the line numbers are after preprocessing, so they might not directly correspond to float_io.occ lines.

Let me look at the actual error lines more carefully. The error says "expected IS, got IDENT" and "expected type after VAL, got IDENT". This suggests some kind of RETYPES-related construct or something similar.

Let me look at the float_io.occ file around the relevant areas.

Let me look at the specific lines causing the parse errors and understand the RETYPES/intrinsics constructs.

$ Bash
Count total parse errors
./occam2go -I kroc/modules/course/libsrc -D TARGET.BITS.PER.WORD=32 -o /tmp/course_full.go kroc/modules/course/libsrc/course.module 2>&1 | wc -l
598
$ Bash
Get all parse errors
./occam2go -I kroc/modules/course/libsrc -D TARGET.BITS.PER.WORD=32 -o /tmp/course_full.go kroc/modules/course/libsrc/course.module 2>&1
Exit code 1
Parse errors:
  line 2097: expected IS, got IDENT
  line 2097: unexpected token: :
  line 2101: expected type after VAL, got IDENT
  line 2101: unexpected token: IS
  line 2101: unexpected token: INT
  line 2101: unexpected token: :
  line 2102: expected type after VAL, got IDENT
  line 2102: unexpected token: IS
  line 2102: unexpected token: INT
  line 2102: unexpected token: :
  line 2103: expected type after VAL, got IDENT
  line 2103: unexpected token: IS
  line 2103: unexpected token: INT
  line 2103: unexpected token: :
  line 2104: expected type after VAL, got IDENT
  line 2104: unexpected token: IS
  line 2104: unexpected token: INT
  line 2104: unexpected token: :
  line 2107: expected type after VAL, got IDENT
  line 2107: unexpected token: IS
  line 2107: unexpected token: INT
  line 2107: unexpected token: :
  line 2108: expected type after VAL, got IDENT
  line 2108: unexpected token: IS
  line 2108: unexpected token: INT
  line 2108: unexpected token: :
  line 2109: expected type after VAL, got IDENT
  line 2109: unexpected token: IS
  line 2109: unexpected token: INT
  line 2109: unexpected token: :
  line 2110: expected type after VAL, got IDENT
  line 2110: unexpected token: IS
  line 2110: unexpected token: INT
  line 2110: unexpected token: :
  line 2111: expected type after VAL, got IDENT
  line 2111: unexpected token: IS
  line 2111: unexpected token: INT
  line 2111: unexpected token: :
  line 2112: expected type after VAL, got IDENT
  line 2112: unexpected token: IS
  line 2112: unexpected token: INT
  line 2112: unexpected token: :
  line 2113: expected type after VAL, got IDENT
  line 2113: unexpected token: IS
  line 2113: unexpected token: INT
  line 2113: unexpected token: :
  line 2117: expected type after VAL, got IDENT
  line 2117: unexpected token: IS
  line 2117: unexpected token: INT
  line 2117: unexpected token: :
  line 2118: expected type after VAL, got IDENT
  line 2118: unexpected token: IS
  line 2118: unexpected token: INT
  line 2118: unexpected token: :
  line 2119: expected type after VAL, got IDENT
  line 2119: unexpected token: IS
  line 2119: unexpected token: INT
  line 2119: unexpected token: :
  line 2120: expected type after VAL, got IDENT
  line 2120: unexpected token: IS
  line 2120: unexpected token: INT
  line 2120: unexpected token: :
  line 2136: expected type after VAL, got IDENT
  line 2136: unexpected token: IS
  line 2136: expected ], got ,
  line 2136: unexpected token: ,
  line 2136: unexpected token: INT
  line 2136: unexpected token: ,
  line 2136: unexpected token: INT
  line 2136: unexpected token: ,
  line 2136: unexpected token: INT
  line 2136: unexpected token: ,
  line 2137: unexpected token: INT
  line 2137: unexpected token: ,
  line 2137: unexpected token: INT
  line 2137: unexpected token: ,
  line 2137: unexpected token: INT
  line 2137: unexpected token: ,
  line 2137: unexpected token: INT
  line 2137: unexpected token: ,
  line 2138: unexpected token: INT
  line 2138: unexpected token: ,
  line 2138: unexpected token: INT
  line 2138: unexpected token: ,
  line 2138: unexpected token: INT
  line 2138: unexpected token: ,
  line 2138: unexpected token: INT
  line 2138: unexpected token: ,
  line 2139: unexpected token: INT
  line 2139: unexpected token: ,
  line 2139: unexpected token: INT
  line 2139: unexpected token: ]
  line 2139: unexpected token: :
  line 2141: expected type after VAL, got IDENT
  line 2141: unexpected token: IS
  line 2141: expected ], got ,
  line 2141: unexpected token: ,
  line 2141: unexpected token: INT
  line 2141: unexpected token: ,
  line 2141: unexpected token: INT
  line 2141: unexpected token: ,
  line 2141: unexpected token: INT
  line 2141: unexpected token: ,
  line 2141: unexpected token: INT
  line 2141: unexpected token: ,
  line 2141: unexpected token: INT
  line 2141: unexpected token: ,
  line 2141: unexpected token: INT
  line 2141: unexpected token: ,
  line 2141: unexpected token: INT
  line 2141: unexpected token: ,
  line 2141: unexpected token: INT
  line 2141: unexpected token: ,
  line 2141: unexpected token: INT
  line 2141: unexpected token: ,
  line 2141: unexpected token: INT
  line 2141: unexpected token: ,
  line 2141: unexpected token: INT
  line 2141: unexpected token: ,
  line 2141: unexpected token: INT
  line 2141: unexpected token: ,
  line 2141: unexpected token: INT
  line 2141: unexpected token: ]
  line 2141: unexpected token: :
  line 2143: expected type after VAL, got IDENT
  line 2143: unexpected token: IS
  line 2143: expected ], got ,
  line 2143: unexpected token: ,
  line 2143: unexpected token: INT
  line 2143: unexpected token: ,
  line 2143: unexpected token: INT
  line 2143: unexpected token: ]
  line 2143: unexpected token: :
  line 2145: expected type after VAL, got IDENT
  line 2145: unexpected token: IS
  line 2145: expected ], got ,
  line 2145: unexpected token: ,
  line 2145: unexpected token: INT
  line 2145: unexpected token: ,


... [32454 characters truncated] ...

pected token: INT
  line 3115: unexpected token: ,
  line 3115: unexpected token: INT
  line 3115: unexpected token: ,
  line 3115: unexpected token: INT
  line 3115: unexpected token: ,
  line 3115: unexpected token: INT
  line 3115: unexpected token: ,
  line 3115: unexpected token: INT
  line 3115: unexpected token: ]
  line 3115: unexpected token: :
  line 3117: expected type after VAL, got IDENT
  line 3117: unexpected token: IS
  line 3117: expected ], got ,
  line 3117: unexpected token: ,
  line 3117: unexpected token: INT
  line 3117: unexpected token: ,
  line 3117: unexpected token: INT
  line 3117: unexpected token: ,
  line 3117: unexpected token: INT
  line 3117: unexpected token: ,
  line 3117: unexpected token: INT
  line 3117: unexpected token: ,
  line 3117: unexpected token: INT
  line 3117: unexpected token: ,
  line 3118: unexpected token: INT
  line 3118: unexpected token: ,
  line 3118: unexpected token: INT
  line 3118: unexpected token: ,
  line 3118: unexpected token: INT
  line 3118: unexpected token: ,
  line 3118: unexpected token: INT
  line 3118: unexpected token: ]
  line 3118: unexpected token: :
  line 3120: expected type after VAL, got IDENT
  line 3120: unexpected token: IS
  line 3120: expected ], got ,
  line 3120: unexpected token: ,
  line 3120: unexpected token: INT
  line 3120: unexpected token: ,
  line 3120: unexpected token: INT
  line 3120: unexpected token: ,
  line 3120: unexpected token: INT
  line 3120: unexpected token: ,
  line 3120: unexpected token: INT
  line 3120: unexpected token: ]
  line 3120: unexpected token: :
  line 3122: expected type after VAL, got IDENT
  line 3122: unexpected token: IS
  line 3122: expected ], got ,
  line 3122: unexpected token: ,
  line 3122: unexpected token: INT
  line 3122: unexpected token: ,
  line 3122: unexpected token: INT
  line 3122: unexpected token: ,
  line 3122: unexpected token: INT
  line 3122: unexpected token: ,
  line 3122: unexpected token: INT
  line 3122: unexpected token: ]
  line 3122: unexpected token: :
  line 3299: unexpected token in expression: NEWLINE
  line 3304: unexpected token in expression: NEWLINE
  line 3510: unexpected token in expression: NEWLINE
  line 3669: unexpected token in expression: NEWLINE
  line 3669: unexpected token: (
  line 3669: unexpected token: (
  line 3669: expected :=, !, or ? after Buf[...], got =
  line 3669: unexpected token: =
  line 3669: unexpected token: BYTE_LIT
  line 3669: unexpected token: )
  line 3669: unexpected token: OR
  line 3670: unexpected token: (
  line 3670: expected :=, !, or ? after Buf[...], got =
  line 3670: unexpected token: =
  line 3670: unexpected token: BYTE_LIT
  line 3670: unexpected token: )
  line 3670: unexpected token: OR
  line 3671: unexpected token: (
  line 3671: expected :=, !, or ? after Buf[...], got =
  line 3671: unexpected token: =
  line 3671: unexpected token: BYTE_LIT
  line 3671: unexpected token: )
  line 3671: unexpected token: OR
  line 3672: unexpected token: (
  line 3672: expected :=, !, or ? after Buf[...], got =
  line 3672: unexpected token: =
  line 3672: unexpected token: BYTE_LIT
  line 3672: unexpected token: )
  line 3672: unexpected token: OR
  line 3673: unexpected token: (
  line 3673: expected :=, !, or ? after Buf[...], got =
  line 3673: unexpected token: =
  line 3673: unexpected token: BYTE_LIT
  line 3673: unexpected token: )
  line 3673: unexpected token: )
  line 3902: unexpected token in expression: NEWLINE
  line 3919: unexpected token in expression: NEWLINE
  line 3919: unexpected token: (
  line 3919: unexpected token: (
  line 3919: unexpected token: =
  line 3919: unexpected token: INT
  line 3919: unexpected token: )
  line 3919: unexpected token: AND
  line 3919: unexpected token: (
  line 3919: unexpected token: <
  line 3919: unexpected token: )
  line 3919: unexpected token: AND
  line 3920: unexpected token: (
  line 3920: unexpected token: (
  line 3920: unexpected token: (
  line 3920: unexpected token: -
  line 3920: unexpected token: )
  line 3920: unexpected token: -
  line 3920: unexpected token: INT
  line 3920: unexpected token: )
  line 3920: unexpected token: <=
  line 3920: unexpected token: )
  line 3920: unexpected token: )
  line 3940: unexpected token in expression: NEWLINE
  line 3940: unexpected token: (
  line 3940: unexpected token: (
  line 3940: unexpected token: =
  line 3940: unexpected token: INT
  line 3940: unexpected token: )
  line 3940: unexpected token: AND
  line 3940: unexpected token: (
  line 3940: unexpected token: <
  line 3940: unexpected token: )
  line 3940: unexpected token: AND
  line 3941: unexpected token: (
  line 3941: unexpected token: (
  line 3941: unexpected token: (
  line 3941: unexpected token: -
  line 3941: unexpected token: )
  line 3941: unexpected token: -
  line 3941: unexpected token: INT
  line 3941: unexpected token: )
  line 3941: unexpected token: <=
  line 3941: unexpected token: )
  line 3941: unexpected token: )
Thinking

Lots of errors. Let me understand the patterns:

  1. Line 2097: "expected IS, got IDENT" — This is likely a RETYPES declaration
  2. Lines 2101-2120: "expected type after VAL, got IDENT" — These are likely VAL INT32 ... or some type that isn't recognized
  3. Lines 2136+: Array literal initializers VAL [n]INT x IS [1, 2, 3, ...]:
  4. Lines 3299, 3304, etc.: "unexpected token in expression: NEWLINE" — multi-line expressions

  5. Lines 3669+: Buf[i] = 'x' being confused (equality test in expression context)

I need to look at the actual preprocessed source to see what these constructs really look like and understand the parsing issues better.

Let me look at the preprocessed output to understand what's at those error lines.

$ Bash
Get unique error patterns
./occam2go -I kroc/modules/course/libsrc -D TARGET.BITS.PER.WORD=32 -o /tmp/course_full.go kroc/modules/course/libsrc/course.module 2>&1 | sort -u | head -30
  line 2097: expected IS, got IDENT
  line 2097: unexpected token: :
  line 2101: expected type after VAL, got IDENT
  line 2101: unexpected token: :
  line 2101: unexpected token: INT
  line 2101: unexpected token: IS
  line 2102: expected type after VAL, got IDENT
  line 2102: unexpected token: :
  line 2102: unexpected token: INT
  line 2102: unexpected token: IS
  line 2103: expected type after VAL, got IDENT
  line 2103: unexpected token: :
  line 2103: unexpected token: INT
  line 2103: unexpected token: IS
  line 2104: expected type after VAL, got IDENT
  line 2104: unexpected token: :
  line 2104: unexpected token: INT
  line 2104: unexpected token: IS
  line 2107: expected type after VAL, got IDENT
  line 2107: unexpected token: :
  line 2107: unexpected token: INT
  line 2107: unexpected token: IS
  line 2108: expected type after VAL, got IDENT
  line 2108: unexpected token: :
  line 2108: unexpected token: INT
  line 2108: unexpected token: IS
  line 2109: expected type after VAL, got IDENT
  line 2109: unexpected token: :
  line 2109: unexpected token: INT
  line 2109: unexpected token: IS

I need to see the actual preprocessed source at those line numbers. Let me add a debug mode to dump the preprocessed output, or I'll examine the float_io.occ source directly.

Read
{
  "file_path": "/home/david/projects/code-associates/occam2go/kroc/modules/course/libsrc/float_io.occ",
  "offset": 125,
  "limit": 100
}
   125→  -- V1.5, 15-Nov-90 SRH
   126→  -- Changed the names of some variables in QuickLog to make code
   127→  -- clearer; 28-Nov-90 SRH
   128→  -- Added assignment to zero of Carry in ScaleX when overflow to
   129→  -- infinity; this prevents possible addition of 1 to infinity to
   130→  -- make a NaN; V1.6, 4-Dec-90 SRH
   131→  --}}}
   132→  --{{{  more information
   133→  -- To help understand the binary to character conversion see "Contributions
   134→  -- to a Proposed Standard for Binary Floating-Point Arithmetic" by J T Coonen,
   135→  -- PhD thesis, 1984, University of California, Berkeley.
   136→  --}}}
   137→
   138→  #IF (TARGET.BITS.PER.WORD = 32)
   139→  VAL INT X RETYPES X :
   140→
   141→  --{{{  Definitions
   142→  --{{{  Word length specific values for 32 bit machine
   143→  VAL SignBit      IS #80000000 :
   144→  VAL BitsPerWord  IS        32 :
   145→  VAL MaxInt       IS #FFFFFFFF :
   146→  VAL BytesPerWord IS         4 :
   147→  --}}}
   148→  --{{{  IEEE Single length constants for 32 bit implementation
   149→  VAL RealShift  IS         8 :
   150→  VAL BitsInFrac IS        24 :
   151→  VAL RealExpSh  IS        23 :
   152→  VAL RealExp    IS       255 :
   153→  VAL RealXcess  IS       127 :
   154→  VAL RealRBit   IS       128 :
   155→  VAL RealInf    IS #7F800000 :
   156→  --}}}
   157→  --{{{  read/write constants
   158→  -- write number constants
   159→  VAL Table10 IS    13 :  --exact power of ten in word
   160→  VAL Bias10  IS     3 :  --extras for full power ten range
   161→  VAL MaxDecN IS     9 :  --maximum dec digits; IEEE sec. 5.6
   162→  VAL R2L     IS #4D10 :  --Log10(2) = 0.3010299956639811952 in low half word
   163→  
   164→  -- The table PowerTenFrac contains the fraction with implicit bit
   165→  -- explicit and then normalized so that there is a one bit in bit 31
   166→  -- of powers of 10 from 10^0 to 10^13.  For example,
   167→  -- 10^3 = 1111101000 in binary, which is 1.111101 * 2^9; so the fraction
   168→  -- bits, with implicit bit explicit ( ie the 1 before the point kept ) is
   169→  -- 1111101, and the actual exponent is 9.  This latter ( the actual
   170→  -- exponent ) is what is in the corresponding table PowerTenExp.
   171→  -- The index of an entry is the same as the power of 10; hence
   172→  -- PowerTenFrac[ 3 ] = #FA000000, and PowerTenExp[ 3 ] = 9.
   173→  -- No bits are lost in the PowerTenFrac table; even the largest value,
   174→  -- 10^13, is exact.
   175→  -- These two tables of constants are simply set up in advance for
   176→  -- efficiency.
   177→  
   178→  VAL PowerTenFrac IS [#80000000, #A0000000, #C8000000, #FA000000,
   179→                       #9C400000, #C3500000, #F4240000, #98968000,
   180→                       #BEBC2000, #EE6B2800, #9502F900, #BA43B740,
   181→                       #E8D4A510, #9184E72A] :
   182→  
   183→  VAL PowerTenExp IS [0, 3, 6, 9, 13, 16, 19, 23, 26, 29, 33, 36, 39, 43] :
   184→  
   185→  VAL BiasTenFrac IS [#9184E72A, #CECB8F28, #EB194F8E] : --P13, P27, P40
   186→  
   187→  VAL BiasTenExp IS [43, 89, 132] :
   188→  
   189→  VAL BiasTen IS [14, 28, 41, 54] : --bias changeover points
   190→  --}}}
   191→  --{{{  rounding constants
   192→  VAL INT rounded.down IS -1 :
   193→  VAL INT exact        IS  0 :
   194→  VAL INT rounded.up   IS  1 :
   195→  --}}}
   196→  --}}}
   197→  --{{{  ScaleX
   198→  PROC ScaleX (INT Xexp, Xfrac, VAL INT Scale, INT direction)
   199→  
   200→    -- Scale X by value of 10^Scale
   201→  
   202→    INT Carry, Places, Sb, St, Zexp, Zfrac :
   203→    SEQ
   204→      --{{{  get abs value of Scale
   205→      IF
   206→        Scale < 0
   207→          St := -Scale
   208→        TRUE
   209→          St := Scale
   210→      --}}}
   211→      --{{{  set Zexp and Zfrac
   212→      IF
   213→        St <= Table10
   214→          --{{{  easy case, 10 in table
   215→          SEQ
   216→            Zexp := PowerTenExp[St]
   217→            Zfrac := PowerTenFrac[St]
   218→          --}}}
   219→        St = (BiasTen[1] - 1)
   220→          --{{{  special case
   221→          SEQ
   222→            Zexp := BiasTenExp[1]
   223→            Zfrac := BiasTenFrac[1]
   224→          --}}}
Grep
{
  "pattern": "RETYPES",
  "path": "/home/david/projects/code-associates/occam2go/kroc/modules/course/libsrc/float_io.occ",
  "output_mode": "content"
}
139:  VAL INT X RETYPES X :
1105:  VAL [2]INT X RETYPES X :
Grep
{
  "pattern": "VAL \\[",
  "path": "/home/david/projects/code-associates/occam2go/kroc/modules/course/libsrc/float_io.occ",
  "output_mode": "content",
  "head_limit": 20
}
1105:  VAL [2]INT X RETYPES X :
1172:  --{{{  INT, INT, INT FUNCTION RealIMul (VAL [2]INT X, Y)
1191:  --{{{  INT, INT, INT FUNCTION RealIMul (VAL [2]INT X, Y)
1192:  INT, INT, INT FUNCTION RealIMul (VAL [2]INT X, Y)
1250:  INT, INT, INT FUNCTION RealIDiv (VAL INT Hi, Lo, Guard, VAL [2]INT Yfrac)
1450:  PROC QuickLog (INT LogX, VAL INT Xexp, VAL [2]INT Xfrac)
1598:  PROC WriteDec ([]BYTE Buf, INT Length, VAL []INT Num)

[Showing results with pagination = limit: 20, offset: 0]
Thinking

Now I can see the patterns clearly. Let me understand each error category:

  1. Line 139: VAL INT X RETYPES X : — RETYPES declaration. This is a type reinterpretation. In this context, it reinterprets the REAL32 parameter X (from the PROC signature) as an INT.

  2. Lines 143-161: VAL SignBit IS #80000000 : — These are abbreviations WITHOUT a type. The parser expects VAL TYPE name IS expr :, but these are VAL name IS expr :. This is an untyped abbreviation where the type is inferred.

  3. Lines 178-189: Array literal initializers in abbreviations aren't supported by the parser — it can't handle the bracket syntax for inline arrays.

  4. Multi-line expressions: Expressions that span multiple lines without parentheses to suppress INDENT/DEDENT tokens.

  5. Lines 3669+: Assignment syntax issue — occam uses := for assignment, but the code has = which the parser interprets as equality comparison instead.

Looking at the broader pattern, the main blockers are RETYPES declarations, untyped VAL abbreviations, array literal syntax, multi-line expressions without parens, and transputer intrinsics being called as regular functions in assignments. Let me dig deeper into the file to confirm these are the primary obstacles.

Grep
{
  "pattern": "LONGPROD|LONGDIV|LONGSUM|LONGDIFF|NORMALISE|SHIFTRIGHT|SHIFTLEFT|CAUSEERROR",
  "path": "/home/david/projects/code-associates/occam2go/kroc/modules/course/libsrc/float_io.occ",
  "output_mode": "content",
  "head_limit": 30
}
242:                  Zfrac, Carry := LONGPROD (PowerTenFrac[St],
244:                  Places, Zfrac, Carry := NORMALISE (Zfrac, Carry)
269:            Xfrac, Carry := LONGDIV (Xfrac >> 1, 0, Zfrac)
272:            -- set.  This means that the smallest that Xfrac as answer to the LONGDIV
278:            --Borrow, dummy := LONGDIFF (Carry, Zfrac >> 1, 0) --see if over half left
291:                Carry, remainder := LONGDIV( Carry, 0, Zfrac )
300:            Xfrac, Carry := LONGPROD (Xfrac, Zfrac, 0)
304:      Places, Xfrac, Carry := NORMALISE (Xfrac, Carry)
316:            Carry, Xfrac := LONGSUM (Xfrac, 1, 0)
343:      dummy, X := SHIFTRIGHT (Xexp, Xfrac << 1, BitsPerWord / 2)
348:            X, low.word   := LONGPROD (-X, R2L + 1, 0)
349:            Borrow, dummy := LONGDIFF (0, low.word, 0)
350:            Borrow, LogX  := LONGDIFF (0, X, Borrow)
352:          LogX, dummy := LONGPROD (X, R2L, 0)       --mul by Log10(2)
379:      Xint, Guard := SHIFTRIGHT (Xfrac, 0, Places)
409:      ExpExtra, Xfrac := SHIFTLEFT (0, Xint, Places)
441:          N, T := LONGDIV (0, N, 10) --effects N := N / 10 ; T := N REM 10
601:        Xexp, Xfrac := SHIFTLEFT (0, X /\ (~SignBit), RealShift + 1)
700:                    Places, Xfrac, Carry := NORMALISE (Xfrac, 0)
738:              Carry, M := LONGDIFF (Xfrac, PowerTenFrac[N], 0)
988:  CAUSEERROR ()
1207:        Carry,  D[0] := LONGPROD ( X[0],  Y[0],  0)
1208:        Carry,  D[1] := LONGPROD ( X[0],  Y[1],  Carry)
1209:        D[3],   D[2] := LONGPROD ( X[1],  Y[0],  0)
1210:        R.hi,   R.lo := LONGPROD ( X[1],  Y[1],  Carry)
1211:        Carry, Guard := LONGSUM ( D[2],  D[1],  0)
1212:        Carry,  R.lo := LONGSUM ( R.lo,  D[3],  Carry)
1213:        Carry,  R.hi := LONGSUM ( R.hi,  0,  Carry)
1279:            Quot,  Carry := LONGDIV ( Hi,  Lo,  Yfrac[1] )
1283:              W[1],  W[0] := LONGPROD ( Quot,  Yfrac[0],  0 )

[Showing results with pagination = limit: 30, offset: 0]
Read
{
  "file_path": "/home/david/projects/code-associates/occam2go/kroc/modules/course/libsrc/float_io.occ",
  "offset": 1095,
  "limit": 60
}
  1095→  -- infinity; this prevents possible addition of 1 to infinity to
  1096→  -- make a NaN; V1.5, 4-Dec-90 SRH
  1097→  --}}}
  1098→  --{{{  more information
  1099→  -- To help understand the binary to character conversion see "Contributions
  1100→  -- to a Proposed Standard for Binary Floating-Point Arithmetic" by J T Coonen,
  1101→  -- PhD thesis, 1984, University of California, Berkeley.
  1102→  --}}}
  1103→
  1104→  #IF (TARGET.BITS.PER.WORD = 32)
  1105→  VAL [2]INT X RETYPES X :
  1106→
  1107→  --{{{  Definitions
  1108→  --{{{  Word length specific values for 32 bit machine
  1109→  VAL SignBit        IS #80000000 :
  1110→  VAL BitsPerWord    IS        32 :
  1111→  VAL MaxUnsignedInt IS #FFFFFFFF :
  1112→  VAL BytesPerWord   IS         4 :
  1113→  --}}}
  1114→  --{{{  IEEE Double length constants for 32 bit implementation
  1115→  VAL DRealShift  IS        11 :
  1116→  VAL DBitsInFrac IS        53 :
  1117→  VAL DRealExpSh  IS        20 :
  1118→  VAL DRealExp    IS      #7FF :
  1119→  VAL DRealXcess  IS      1023 :
  1120→  VAL DRealRBit   IS      #400 :
  1121→  VAL DRealInf    IS #7FF00000 :
  1122→  --}}}
  1123→  --{{{  read/write constants
  1124→  -- write number constants
  1125→  VAL Table10 IS    27 :  --exact power of ten in word
  1126→  VAL Bias10  IS     4 :  --extras for full power ten range
  1127→  VAL MaxDecN IS    17 :  --maximum dec digits; IEEE 754-1985, Sec 5.6
  1128→  VAL R2L     IS #4D10 :  --Log10(2) = 0.3010299956639811952 in low half word
  1129→  
  1130→  -- The table PowerTenFrac contains the fraction with implicit bit
  1131→  -- explicit and then normalized so that there is a one bit in bit 31
  1132→  -- of powers of 10 from 10^0 to 10^27.  For example,
  1133→  -- 10^3 = 1111101000 in binary, which is 1.111101 * 2^9; so the fraction
  1134→  -- bits, with implicit bit explicit ( ie the 1 before the point kept ) is
  1135→  -- 1111101, and the actual exponent is 9.  This latter ( the actual
  1136→  -- exponent ) is what is in the corresponding table PowerTenExp.
  1137→  -- The index of an entry is the same as the power of 10 in
  1138→  -- PowerTenExp; hence PowerTenExp[ 3 ] = 9.  For PowerTenFrac twice
  1139→  -- the power of 10 gives the index of the lower word of the fraction,
  1140→  -- the upper word being in the next element; hence
  1141→  -- PowerTenFrac[ 2 * 3 ] = #00000000 and
  1142→  -- PowerTenFrac[ 2 * 3 + 1 ] = #FA000000.
  1143→  -- These two tables of constants are simply set up in advance for
  1144→  -- efficiency.
  1145→  VAL PowerTenFrac IS [#00000000, #80000000, #00000000, #A0000000,
  1146→   #00000000, #C8000000, #00000000, #FA000000, #00000000, #9C400000,
  1147→   #00000000, #C3500000, #00000000, #F4240000, #00000000, #98968000,
  1148→   #00000000, #BEBC2000, #00000000, #EE6B2800, #00000000, #9502F900,
  1149→   #00000000, #BA43B740, #00000000, #E8D4A510, #00000000, #9184E72A,
  1150→   #80000000, #B5E620F4, #A0000000, #E35FA931, #04000000, #8E1BC9BF,
  1151→   #C5000000, #B1A2BC2E, #76400000, #DE0B6B3A, #89E80000, #8AC72304,
  1152→   #AC620000, #AD78EBC5, #177A8000, #D8D726B7, #6EAC9000, #87867832,
  1153→   #0A57B400, #A968163F, #CCEDA100, #D3C21BCE, #401484A0, #84595161,
  1154→   #9019A5C8, #A56FA5B9, #F4200F3A, #CECB8F27] :
Thinking

Now I can see the full picture. Let me categorize all the issues:

  1. RETYPES: VAL INT X RETYPES X : and VAL [2]INT X RETYPES X : - type reinterpretation
  2. Untyped VAL abbreviations: VAL SignBit IS #80000000 : — no type keyword, just VAL name IS expr :
  3. Array literal initializers: VAL PowerTenFrac IS [#80000000, #A0000000, ...] : — array literal
  4. Transputer intrinsics as multi-assignment: Zfrac, Carry := LONGPROD (...) — these look like function calls returning multiple values, which the parser should already handle if LONGPROD etc.

The real challenge is figuring out the implementation order. I've got several distinct parser issues to tackle: RETYPES declarations, untyped VAL abbreviations, array literal syntax, and multi-line expressions that might or might not be wrapped in parentheses depending on how the occam source is actually formatted.

On the codegen side, I need to handle RETYPES by mapping to Go's bit conversion functions, translate transputer intrinsics into Go helpers, and convert CAUSEERROR calls to panics.

Looking at the specific error around line 3669, the parser is treating Buf[i] = 'x' as a statement when it's actually part of a boolean expression, which suggests the multi-line expression handling is the immediate blocker. I also need to account for the fact that the preprocessed line numbers include all the included files before float_io.occ, so the actual source lines are shifted.

I should tackle these in order of impact: untyped VAL abbreviations first since they're the most frequent and straightforward, then array literal initializers for the constant tables, followed by RETYPES and transputer intrinsics. The untyped VAL issue specifically is that the parser expects VAL <type> <name> IS <expr> : but the code has VAL <name> IS <expr> : without an explicit type annotation. without a type. The type is inferred.

And for array literals:

VAL PowerTenFrac IS [#80000000, #A0000000, ...] :

This is an untyped VAL abbreviation with an array literal value.

Let me look at the parser code to see how VAL abbreviations are currently parsed.

Let me also look at what the INT32 type mentions mean... Actually, wait. Looking at line 2101: expected type after VAL, got IDENT — the identifier after VAL is not a type keyword. In occam, SignBit is an identifier, not a type. So the parser sees VAL, expects a type keyword (INT, BYTE, etc.), but gets an identifier name. This is the untyped VAL abbreviation.

So I need to handle untyped VAL abbreviations where the type gets inferred, array literal syntax that maps to Go slices, RETYPES declarations for type reinterpretation, and several transputer intrinsics like LONGPROD and NORMALISE that I'll need to map to Go helpers. I also need to handle CAUSEERROR() as a panic, and there are some multi-line expression issues to work through.

The user wants me to continue with the implementation, so let me start by examining the parser to understand the current VAL abbreviation handling and then work through the task list systematically.

Now I have a clear picture of what needs to be implemented. Let me enter plan mode since this is a significant multi-feature implementation.

EnterPlanMode
{}
Entered plan mode. You should now focus on exploring the codebase and designing an implementation approach.

In plan mode, you should:
1. Thoroughly explore the codebase to understand existing patterns
2. Identify similar features and architectural approaches
3. Consider multiple approaches and their trade-offs
4. Use AskUserQuestion if you need to clarify the approach
5. Design a concrete implementation strategy
6. When ready, use ExitPlanMode to present your plan for approval

Remember: DO NOT write or edit any files yet. This is a read-only exploration and planning phase.
Task
Explore parser VAL/abbreviation handling
{
  "subagent_type": "Explore",
  "prompt": "Explore the parser code in /home/david/projects/code-associates/occam2go/parser/parser.go to understand:\n\n1. How VAL abbreviations are currently parsed (search for \"VAL\", \"abbreviation\", \"parseAbbreviation\" or similar functions). Find the exact code that handles `VAL INT x IS 42:` and `VAL []BYTE s IS \"hi\":`.\n\n2. How expressions are currently parsed - specifically look at `parseExpression`, `parsePrefixExpression`, and the prefix parsing functions. I want to understand what token types trigger prefix parsing (identifiers, literals, etc.).\n\n3. How the parser handles multi-line constructs - specifically look at how the lexer's paren suppression interacts with the parser. Are there any cases where multi-line expressions work?\n\n4. How PROC calls with multi-return assignments are parsed: `a, b := func(...)` - look at `parseMultiAssignment` or similar.\n\n5. Look at how the transputer intrinsics (LONGPROD, LONGDIV, LONGSUM, LONGDIFF, NORMALISE, SHIFTRIGHT, SHIFTLEFT) and CAUSEERROR would need to be recognized - are they keywords or identifiers?\n\nReport the exact function names, line numbers, and code snippets for each of these areas."
}
Task
Explore codegen and AST patterns
{
  "subagent_type": "Explore",
  "prompt": "Explore the AST and codegen code in /home/david/projects/code-associates/occam2go:\n\n1. In ast/ast.go: Find the VarDecl/Abbreviation node types. How do they store type info? Is there a way to represent \"no explicit type\" (type-inferred)?\n\n2. In codegen/codegen.go: Find how abbreviations are generated (look for \"Abbreviation\", \"VarDecl\", \"IsAbbreviation\" etc.). How does it determine the Go type for a VAL abbreviation?\n\n3. In codegen/codegen.go: Look at how the `goIdent()` function works. Look at how type conversions are generated. Look at how imports are determined (the `containsX()` scanner functions).\n\n4. In lexer/token.go: What tokens exist? Are there tokens for RETYPES, LONGPROD, etc.? What new tokens would need to be added?\n\n5. In codegen/e2e_test.go: Look at a few examples of e2e tests to understand the pattern for adding new tests.\n\n6. In codegen/codegen.go: Look at how the existing MOSTNEG/MOSTPOS expressions are generated, since those also require the math import.\n\nReport exact function names, line numbers, and code snippets."
}
Task
Explore float_io.occ constructs needed
{
  "subagent_type": "Explore",
  "prompt": "Explore the float_io.occ file at /home/david/projects/code-associates/occam2go/kroc/modules/course/libsrc/float_io.occ to catalog ALL the language constructs that need to be implemented. Specifically:\n\n1. Find ALL RETYPES declarations and show their context (surrounding 3 lines). What types are being retyped to/from?\n\n2. Find ALL untyped VAL abbreviations (VAL name IS expr : without a type keyword). Distinguish:\n   - Simple scalar: `VAL SignBit IS #80000000 :`\n   - Array literal: `VAL PowerTenFrac IS [#80000000, ...] :`\n\n3. Find multi-line expressions (boolean expressions with AND/OR that span multiple lines). Show the full expressions with their surrounding context.\n\n4. Find ALL uses of transputer intrinsics (LONGPROD, LONGDIV, LONGSUM, LONGDIFF, NORMALISE, SHIFTRIGHT, SHIFTLEFT). For each, note the assignment pattern: is it `a, b := FUNC(...)` or `a, b, c := FUNC(...)`?\n\n5. Find ALL CAUSEERROR uses and their context.\n\n6. Look for any other constructs that might cause parse errors that I haven't identified yet. Look for unusual patterns.\n\n7. Check if there are any `VAL []INT` or `VAL [n]INT` typed abbreviations with array literal initializers.\n\nReport your findings organized by construct type with line numbers."
}
[
  {
    "type": "text",
    "text": "Perfect! Now I have all the information I need. Let me compile a comprehensive report.\n\n## Comprehensive Parser Code Exploration Report\n\nBased on my thorough analysis of `/home/david/projects/code-associates/occam2go/parser/parser.go`, here are the exact findings for each of your requested areas:\n\n---\n\n### 1. VAL Abbreviation Parsing\n\n**Function:** `parseAbbreviation()` (lines 315-366)\n**Related:** `parseVarDeclOrAbbreviation()` (lines 262-313)\n\nThe VAL abbreviation is parsed when the parser encounters the `VAL` token at line 164-165:\n```go\ncase lexer.VAL:\n    return p.parseAbbreviation()\n```\n\n**Key Code (lines 318-366):**\n```go\nfunc (p *Parser) parseAbbreviation() *ast.Abbreviation {\n    token := p.curToken // VAL token\n    \n    p.nextToken()\n    \n    // Check for []TYPE (open array abbreviation)\n    isOpenArray := false\n    if p.curTokenIs(lexer.LBRACKET) && p.peekTokenIs(lexer.RBRACKET) {\n        isOpenArray = true\n        p.nextToken() // consume ]\n        p.nextToken() // move to type\n    }\n    \n    // Expect a type keyword\n    if !isTypeToken(p.curToken.Type) {\n        p.addError(fmt.Sprintf(\"expected type after VAL, got %s\", p.curToken.Type))\n        return nil\n    }\n    typeName := p.curToken.Literal\n    \n    // Expect name\n    if !p.expectPeek(lexer.IDENT) {\n        return nil\n    }\n    name := p.curToken.Literal\n    \n    // Expect IS\n    if !p.expectPeek(lexer.IS) {\n        return nil\n    }\n    \n    // Parse expression\n    p.nextToken()\n    value := p.parseExpression(LOWEST)\n    \n    // Expect colon\n    if !p.expectPeek(lexer.COLON) {\n        return nil\n    }\n    \n    return &ast.Abbreviation{\n        Token:       token,\n        IsVal:       true,\n        IsOpenArray: isOpenArray,\n        Type:        typeName,\n        Name:        name,\n        Value:       value,\n    }\n}\n```\n\n**Examples handled:**\n- `VAL INT x IS 42:` → Open array flag = false, Type = \"INT\", Name = \"x\", Value = parsed expression\n- `VAL []BYTE s IS \"hi\":` → Open array flag = true, Type = \"BYTE\", Name = \"s\", Value = string literal\n\n**Non-VAL abbreviations** (like `INT y IS z:`) are handled separately in `parseVarDeclOrAbbreviation()` at lines 274-289, which creates an `Abbreviation` struct with `IsVal: false`.\n\n---\n\n### 2. Expression Parsing - Prefix Triggers\n\n**Main Function:** `parseExpression()` (lines 2525-2678)\n\nThe switch statement at lines 2528-2655 defines all prefix token triggers:\n\n```go\nswitch p.curToken.Type {\ncase lexer.IDENT:              // Line 2529\n    if p.peekTokenIs(lexer.LPAREN) {\n        left = p.parseFuncCallExpr()\n    } else {\n        left = &ast.Identifier{Token: p.curToken, Value: p.curToken.Literal}\n    }\ncase lexer.INT:                // Line 2535\n    // Parse integer literal\ncase lexer.TRUE:               // Line 2548\n    left = &ast.BooleanLiteral{Token: p.curToken, Value: true}\ncase lexer.FALSE:              // Line 2550\n    left = &ast.BooleanLiteral{Token: p.curToken, Value: false}\ncase lexer.STRING:             // Line 2552\n    left = &ast.StringLiteral{Token: p.curToken, Value: p.curToken.Literal}\ncase lexer.BYTE_LIT:           // Line 2554\n    // Parse byte literal\ncase lexer.LPAREN:             // Line 2561\n    // Parenthesized expression\ncase lexer.MINUS, lexer.MINUS_KW:  // Line 2567\n    // Unary minus\ncase lexer.NOT:                // Line 2575\n    // Logical NOT\ncase lexer.BITNOT:             // Line 2583\n    // Bitwise NOT (~)\ncase lexer.LBRACKET:           // Line 2591\n    // Slice expression: [arr FROM start FOR length]\ncase lexer.SIZE_KW:            // Line 2621\n    // SIZE operator\ncase lexer.MOSTNEG_KW, lexer.MOSTPOS_KW:  // Line 2628\n    // Min/max value constants\ncase lexer.INT_TYPE, lexer.BYTE_TYPE, lexer.BOOL_TYPE, \n    lexer.REAL_TYPE, lexer.REAL32_TYPE, lexer.REAL64_TYPE:  // Line 2644\n    // Type conversion prefix\n```\n\n**Infix Operators** (lines 2657-2675):\nThe parser loops through infix operators when precedence allows:\n```go\ncase lexer.PLUS, lexer.MINUS, lexer.MULTIPLY, lexer.DIVIDE, lexer.MODULO,\n    lexer.PLUS_KW, lexer.MINUS_KW, lexer.TIMES,\n    lexer.EQ, lexer.NEQ, lexer.LT, lexer.GT, lexer.LE, lexer.GE,\n    lexer.AND, lexer.OR, lexer.AFTER,\n    lexer.BITAND, lexer.BITOR, lexer.BITXOR, lexer.LSHIFT, lexer.RSHIFT:\n    p.nextToken()\n    left = p.parseBinaryExpr(left)\ncase lexer.LBRACKET:\n    p.nextToken()\n    left = p.parseIndexExpression(left)\n```\n\n---\n\n### 3. Multi-line Constructs & Paren Suppression\n\n**Lexer Level:** `/home/david/projects/code-associates/occam2go/lexer/lexer.go`\n\nThe lexer tracks `parenDepth` (line 21) and suppresses INDENT/DEDENT/NEWLINE inside parentheses:\n\n```go\n// Lines 68-70: Suppress INDENT inside parens\nif l.parenDepth > 0 {\n    // Inside parentheses: suppress INDENT/DEDENT tokens\n}\n\n// Lines 96-100: Track parenthesis depth\ncase '(':\n    l.parenDepth++\n    tok = l.newToken(LPAREN, l.ch)\ncase ')':\n    if l.parenDepth > 0 {\n        l.parenDepth--\n    }\n\n// Lines 220-223: Suppress NEWLINE inside parens\nif l.parenDepth > 0 {\n    // Inside parentheses: suppress NEWLINE, get next real token\n    return l.NextToken()\n}\n```\n\n**Parser Level:** Multi-line parameter lists are handled at lines 1900-1905 in `parseProcParams()`:\n```go\nfor {\n    // Skip newlines inside parameter lists (multi-line params)\n    // Note: INDENT/DEDENT/NEWLINE inside (...) are suppressed by the lexer\n    for p.curTokenIs(lexer.NEWLINE) {\n        p.nextToken()\n    }\n```\n\n**Multi-line expressions work because:**\n- Expressions inside `(...)` have NEWLINE/INDENT/DEDENT suppressed at the lexer level\n- Function calls use `parseFuncCallExpr()` (lines 2294-2321), which handles arguments separated by commas\n- The parser doesn't see indentation-related tokens inside parens, so it can parse multi-line expressions naturally\n\n---\n\n### 4. Multi-Return Assignment Parsing\n\n**Function:** `parseMultiAssignment()` (line 426) and `parseMultiAssignmentFrom()` (lines 434-469)\n\nTriggered when parsing an IDENT statement and the peek token is COMMA (line 213-214):\n```go\nif p.peekTokenIs(lexer.COMMA) {\n    return p.parseMultiAssignment()\n}\n```\n\n**Full Code (lines 426-469):**\n```go\nfunc (p *Parser) parseMultiAssignment() *ast.MultiAssignment {\n    firstTarget := ast.MultiAssignTarget{Name: p.curToken.Literal}\n    return p.parseMultiAssignmentFrom(firstTarget)\n}\n\nfunc (p *Parser) parseMultiAssignmentFrom(firstTarget ast.MultiAssignTarget) *ast.MultiAssignment {\n    stmt := &ast.MultiAssignment{\n        Targets: []ast.MultiAssignTarget{firstTarget},\n    }\n    \n    // Parse comma-separated targets: a, b[i], c\n    for p.peekTokenIs(lexer.COMMA) {\n        p.nextToken() // consume comma\n        p.nextToken() // move to next target\n        target := ast.MultiAssignTarget{Name: p.curToken.Literal}\n        if p.peekTokenIs(lexer.LBRACKET) {\n            p.nextToken() // move to [\n            p.nextToken() // move past [\n            target.Index = p.parseExpression(LOWEST)\n            if !p.expectPeek(lexer.RBRACKET) {\n                return nil\n            }\n        }\n        stmt.Targets = append(stmt.Targets, target)\n    }\n    \n    p.nextToken() // move to :=\n    stmt.Token = p.curToken\n    \n    p.nextToken() // move past :=\n    \n    // Parse comma-separated values\n    stmt.Values = []ast.Expression{p.parseExpression(LOWEST)}\n    for p.peekTokenIs(lexer.COMMA) {\n        p.nextToken() // consume comma\n        p.nextToken() // move to next expression\n        stmt.Values = append(stmt.Values, p.parseExpression(LOWEST))\n    }\n    \n    return stmt\n}\n```\n\n**Supports:**\n- `a, b := func(...)` — multi-result function calls\n- `x[0], x[1] := x[1], x[0]` — indexed multi-assignment (target.Index handling at lines 444-450)\n\n---\n\n### 5. Transputer Intrinsics & CAUSEERROR Recognition\n\n**Current Status:** NOT YET IMPLEMENTED as keywords\n\nChecked in `/home/david/projects/code-associates/occam2go/lexer/token.go` (lines 1-244):\n- No token types exist for: `LONGPROD`, `LONGDIV`, `LONGSUM`, `LONGDIFF`, `NORMALISE`, `SHIFTRIGHT`, `SHIFTLEFT`, `CAUSEERROR`\n- These would be recognized as **IDENT tokens** (line 14, 239-243):\n\n```go\n// From token.go line 239-243:\nfunc LookupIdent(ident string) TokenType {\n    if tok, ok := keywords[ident]; ok {\n        return tok\n    }\n    return IDENT  // <- These intrinsics fall through here\n}\n```\n\n**How to add them:**\n\n1. **In `/home/david/projects/code-associates/occam2go/lexer/token.go`:**\n   - Add token types between lines 92-96 (after TIMES, before keyword_end)\n   - Add to `tokenNames` map (lines 99-184)\n   - Add to `keywords` map (lines 186-230)\n\n2. **In Parser:**\n   - They would be recognized as **function-like identifiers in prefix position**\n   - When parser sees `LONGPROD(a, b)`, it triggers `parseFuncCallExpr()` (line 2294) because:\n     - `case lexer.IDENT:` at line 2529 matches (if they're IDENT)\n     - `if p.peekTokenIs(lexer.LPAREN)` at line 2530 would be true\n     - Could also make them keywords and add `case` branches in `parseExpression()` to handle them like type conversions\n\n---\n\n## Summary Table\n\n| Area | Location | Key Functions | Lines |\n|------|----------|---|-------|\n| **VAL Abbreviations** | parser.go | `parseAbbreviation()`, `parseVarDeclOrAbbreviation()` | 315-366, 262-313 |\n| **Expression Parsing - Prefix** | parser.go | `parseExpression()` | 2525-2655 |\n| **Expression Parsing - Infix** | parser.go | `parseExpression()`, `parseBinaryExpr()` | 2657-2692 |\n| **Paren Suppression** | lexer.go | `NextToken()` (parenDepth tracking) | 68-70, 96-100, 220-223 |\n| **Multi-line Params** | parser.go | `parseProcParams()` | 1900-1905 |\n| **Multi-Assignment** | parser.go | `parseMultiAssignment()`, `parseMultiAssignmentFrom()` | 426-469 |\n| **Transputer Intrinsics** | token.go | (NOT YET IMPLEMENTED) | - |\n| **Current Keywords** | token.go | `keywords` map, PLUS_KW, MINUS_KW, TIMES | 186-230 |\n\nAll file paths are absolute: `/home/david/projects/code-associates/occam2go/`"
  },
  {
    "type": "text",
    "text": "agentId: ad6fa5e (for resuming to continue this agent's work if needed)\n<usage>total_tokens: 69406\ntool_uses: 18\nduration_ms: 48424</usage>"
  }
]
[
  {
    "type": "text",
    "text": "Perfect! Now I have all the information I need. Let me create a comprehensive report:\n\n## Comprehensive Exploration Report: AST, Codegen, and Lexer Analysis\n\n### 1. AST Node Types for Type Information (ast/ast.go)\n\n#### VarDecl Structure (lines 36-44)\n```go\ntype VarDecl struct {\n\tToken lexer.Token // the type token (INT, BYTE, BOOL)\n\tType  string      // \"INT\", \"BYTE\", \"BOOL\", etc.\n\tNames []string    // variable names (can declare multiple: INT x, y, z:)\n}\n```\n**Key insight**: VarDecl always stores an explicit type in the `Type` field (string). There's no mechanism for type-inferred/implicit declarations currently—all VarDecl nodes must have an explicit type.\n\n#### Abbreviation Structure (lines 484-496)\n```go\ntype Abbreviation struct {\n\tToken       lexer.Token // VAL, INITIAL, or type token\n\tIsVal       bool        // true for VAL abbreviations\n\tIsInitial   bool        // true for INITIAL declarations\n\tIsOpenArray bool        // true for []TYPE abbreviations (e.g. VAL []BYTE)\n\tType        string      // \"INT\", \"BYTE\", \"BOOL\", etc.\n\tName        string      // variable name\n\tValue       Expression  // the expression\n}\n```\n**Key insight**: Abbreviations also have explicit `Type` string. They use flags (`IsVal`, `IsInitial`, `IsOpenArray`) to distinguish variants. No type-inference mechanism exists.\n\n---\n\n### 2. Abbreviation Codegen (codegen/codegen.go)\n\n#### Package-Level Abbreviations (lines 179-190)\nAt the top-level (package scope), abbreviations are generated as package-level `var` declarations:\n\n```go\n// Generate package-level abbreviations (constants)\nfor _, stmt := range abbrDecls {\n\tabbr := stmt.(*ast.Abbreviation)\n\tgoType := g.occamTypeToGo(abbr.Type)\n\tif abbr.IsOpenArray {\n\t\tgoType = \"[]\" + goType\n\t}\n\tg.builder.WriteString(\"var \")\n\tg.write(fmt.Sprintf(\"%s %s = \", goIdent(abbr.Name), goType))\n\tg.generateExpression(abbr.Value)\n\tg.write(\"\\n\")\n}\n```\n\n**Type determination**: Uses `g.occamTypeToGo(abbr.Type)` to convert Occam type string (\"INT\", \"BYTE\", etc.) to Go type (\"int\", \"byte\", etc.). Open arrays get prefix `[]`.\n\n#### Local-Scope Abbreviations (lines 776-781)\n```go\nfunc (g *Generator) generateAbbreviation(abbr *ast.Abbreviation) {\n\tg.builder.WriteString(strings.Repeat(\"\\t\", g.indent))\n\tg.write(fmt.Sprintf(\"%s := \", goIdent(abbr.Name)))\n\tg.generateExpression(abbr.Value)\n\tg.write(\"\\n\")\n}\n```\n\n**Key point**: Local abbreviations use short `:=` syntax (relying on Go's type inference). The `Type` field from the Occam AST is NOT used in the generated Go code—Go infers the type from the RHS expression.\n\n#### occamTypeToGo Function (lines 1155-1180)\n```go\nfunc (g *Generator) occamTypeToGo(occamType string) string {\n\tswitch occamType {\n\tcase \"INT\":\n\t\treturn \"int\"\n\tcase \"BYTE\":\n\t\treturn \"byte\"\n\tcase \"BOOL\":\n\t\treturn \"bool\"\n\tcase \"REAL\":\n\t\treturn \"float64\"\n\tcase \"REAL32\":\n\t\treturn \"float32\"\n\tcase \"REAL64\":\n\t\treturn \"float64\"\n\tdefault:\n\t\t// Check if it's a protocol name\n\t\tif _, ok := g.protocolDefs[occamType]; ok {\n\t\t\treturn \"_proto_\" + occamType\n\t\t}\n\t\t// Check if it's a record type name\n\t\tif _, ok := g.recordDefs[occamType]; ok {\n\t\t\treturn occamType\n\t\t}\n\t\treturn occamType // pass through unknown types\n\t}\n}\n```\n\n**Mapping**: Simple 1:1 string mapping with special cases for protocol and record types.\n\n---\n\n### 3. goIdent() Function (lines 51-55)\n```go\n// goIdent converts an occam identifier to a valid Go identifier.\n// Occam allows dots in identifiers (e.g., out.repeat); Go does not.\nfunc goIdent(name string) string {\n\treturn strings.ReplaceAll(name, \".\", \"_\")\n}\n```\n\n**Usage**: Applied to all identifier outputs—variable names, function names, etc. Replaces `.` with `_` everywhere identifiers appear in generated code (~30+ locations).\n\n---\n\n### 4. Type Conversion Generation (lines 1939-1943)\nIn `generateExpression()`:\n\n```go\ncase *ast.TypeConversion:\n\tg.write(g.occamTypeToGo(e.TargetType))\n\tg.write(\"(\")\n\tg.generateExpression(e.Expr)\n\tg.write(\")\")\n```\n\n**Pattern**: Generates `<GoType>(<expr>)`, e.g., `int(x)`, `float32(y)`.\n\n---\n\n### 5. MOSTNEG/MOSTPOS Expression Generation (lines 666-693)\n```go\nfunc (g *Generator) generateMostExpr(e *ast.MostExpr) {\n\tswitch e.ExprType {\n\tcase \"INT\":\n\t\tif e.IsNeg {\n\t\t\tg.write(\"math.MinInt\")\n\t\t} else {\n\t\t\tg.write(\"math.MaxInt\")\n\t\t}\n\tcase \"BYTE\":\n\t\tif e.IsNeg {\n\t\t\tg.write(\"0\")\n\t\t} else {\n\t\t\tg.write(\"255\")\n\t\t}\n\tcase \"REAL32\":\n\t\tif e.IsNeg {\n\t\t\tg.write(\"-math.MaxFloat32\")\n\t\t} else {\n\t\t\tg.write(\"math.MaxFloat32\")\n\t\t}\n\tcase \"REAL64\":\n\t\tif e.IsNeg {\n\t\t\tg.write(\"-math.MaxFloat64\")\n\t\t} else {\n\t\t\tg.write(\"math.MaxFloat64\")\n\t\t}\n\t}\n}\n```\n\n**Import management**: Uses `math` package for INT/REAL types. Detected via `containsMostExpr()` (line 519) → sets `g.needMath = true` (line 88).\n\n---\n\n### 6. Import Detection Pattern (containsX functions)\n\n**containsMostExpr** (lines 519-632): Recursively scans AST for MostExpr nodes.\n- Returns true if found (excluding BYTE, which uses literals 0/255)\n- Triggers import of `math` package (line 88-90)\n\n**exprNeedsMath** (lines 634-664): Helper that checks expressions:\n```go\nfunc (g *Generator) exprNeedsMath(expr ast.Expression) bool {\n\tif expr == nil {\n\t\treturn false\n\t}\n\tswitch e := expr.(type) {\n\tcase *ast.MostExpr:\n\t\t// BYTE uses literal 0/255, doesn't need math\n\t\treturn e.ExprType != \"BYTE\"\n\tcase *ast.BinaryExpr:\n\t\treturn g.exprNeedsMath(e.Left) || g.exprNeedsMath(e.Right)\n\t// ... recursive checks for UnaryExpr, ParenExpr, TypeConversion, etc.\n\t}\n\treturn false\n}\n```\n\n**Pattern for other imports**:\n- `containsPar()` (line 230) → sets `g.needSync = true` (imports `sync.WaitGroup`)\n- `containsPrint()` (line 297) → sets `g.needFmt = true` (imports `fmt`)\n- `containsTimer()` (line 370) → sets `g.needTime = true` (imports `time`)\n- `containsStop()` (line 446) → sets `g.needOs = true` (imports `os`)\n\nAll flags checked in first pass (lines 74-90), then imports written at the top.\n\n---\n\n### 7. Tokens Available (lexer/token.go)\n\n#### Existing Tokens (relevant to your Phase 2 needs)\n\n**Type Tokens (lines 77-82)**:\n```\nINT_TYPE, BYTE_TYPE, BOOL_TYPE, REAL_TYPE, REAL32_TYPE, REAL64_TYPE\n```\n\n**Arithmetic Keywords (lines 93-95)**:\n```\nPLUS_KW, MINUS_KW, TIMES  // distinct from + - * symbols\n```\n\n**Constants (lines 90-92)**:\n```\nMOSTNEG_KW, MOSTPOS_KW, INITIAL\n```\n\n#### Missing Tokens for Phase 2\nCurrently, **no tokens exist** for:\n- RETYPES\n- LONGPROD, LONGDIV, LONGSUM, LONGDIFF\n- NORMALISE, SHIFTRIGHT, SHIFTLEFT\n- CAUSEERROR\n\n**To add new tokens**, follow the pattern in token.go:\n1. Add TokenType constant (within `keyword_beg`/`keyword_end` range for keywords)\n2. Add entry to `tokenNames` map (line 99+)\n3. Add entry to `keywords` map (line 186+) if it's a keyword\n\nExample:\n```go\n// In const block after INITIAL\nRETYPES      // (or as a keyword)\nLONGPROD     // keyword\nLONGDIV      // keyword\n// ... etc\n\n// In tokenNames map\nRETYPES: \"RETYPES\",\nLONGPROD: \"LONGPROD\",\n// ...\n\n// In keywords map (if keyword)\n\"RETYPES\": RETYPES,\n\"LONGPROD\": LONGPROD,\n// ...\n```\n\n---\n\n### 8. E2E Test Pattern (codegen/e2e_helpers_test.go & e2e_basic_test.go)\n\n#### Helper Function (lines 14-62 of e2e_helpers_test.go)\n```go\nfunc transpileCompileRun(t *testing.T, occamSource string) string {\n\tt.Helper()\n\n\t// Transpile\n\tl := lexer.New(occamSource)\n\tp := parser.New(l)\n\tprogram := p.ParseProgram()\n\n\tif len(p.Errors()) > 0 {\n\t\tfor _, err := range p.Errors() {\n\t\t\tt.Errorf(\"parser error: %s\", err)\n\t\t}\n\t\tt.FailNow()\n\t}\n\n\tgen := New()\n\tgoCode := gen.Generate(program)\n\n\t// Create temp directory for this test\n\ttmpDir, err := os.MkdirTemp(\"\", \"occam2go-test-*\")\n\tif err != nil {\n\t\tt.Fatalf(\"failed to create temp dir: %v\", err)\n\t}\n\tdefer os.RemoveAll(tmpDir)\n\n\t// Write Go source\n\tgoFile := filepath.Join(tmpDir, \"main.go\")\n\tif err := os.WriteFile(goFile, []byte(goCode), 0644); err != nil {\n\t\tt.Fatalf(\"failed to write Go file: %v\", err)\n\t}\n\n\t// Compile\n\tbinFile := filepath.Join(tmpDir, \"main\")\n\tcompileCmd := exec.Command(\"go\", \"build\", \"-o\", binFile, goFile)\n\tcompileOutput, err := compileCmd.CombinedOutput()\n\tif err != nil {\n\t\tt.Fatalf(\"compilation failed: %v\\nOutput: %s\\nGo code:\\n%s\", err, compileOutput, goCode)\n\t}\n\n\t// Run\n\trunCmd := exec.Command(binFile)\n\toutput, err := runCmd.CombinedOutput()\n\tif err != nil {\n\t\tt.Fatalf(\"execution failed: %v\\nOutput: %s\", err, output)\n\t}\n\n\treturn string(output)\n}\n```\n\n#### Example Test (lines 8-18 of e2e_basic_test.go)\n```go\nfunc TestE2E_PrintInt(t *testing.T) {\n\toccam := `SEQ\n  INT x:\n  x := 42\n  print.int(x)\n`\n\toutput := transpileCompileRun(t, occam)\n\texpected := \"42\\n\"\n\tif output != expected {\n\t\tt.Errorf(\"expected %q, got %q\", expected, output)\n\t}\n}\n```\n\n**Pattern for new tests**:\n1. Define Occam source as a string\n2. Call `transpileCompileRun(t, occamSource)` to get stdout\n3. Compare with expected output\n4. File organized by feature: `e2e_basic_test.go`, `e2e_array_test.go`, `e2e_proc_func_test.go`, `e2e_protocol_test.go`, etc.\n\n---\n\n### 9. Abbreviation Parser (parser/parser.go, lines 315-410)\n\n#### VAL Abbreviation Parsing (lines 318-366)\n```go\nfunc (p *Parser) parseAbbreviation() *ast.Abbreviation {\n\ttoken := p.curToken // VAL token\n\n\tp.nextToken()\n\n\t// Check for []TYPE (open array abbreviation)\n\tisOpenArray := false\n\tif p.curTokenIs(lexer.LBRACKET) && p.peekTokenIs(lexer.RBRACKET) {\n\t\tisOpenArray = true\n\t\tp.nextToken() // consume ]\n\t\tp.nextToken() // move to type\n\t}\n\n\t// Expect a type keyword\n\tif !isTypeToken(p.curToken.Type) {\n\t\tp.addError(fmt.Sprintf(\"expected type after VAL, got %s\", p.curToken.Type))\n\t\treturn nil\n\t}\n\ttypeName := p.curToken.Literal\n\n\t// Expect name\n\tif !p.expectPeek(lexer.IDENT) {\n\t\treturn nil\n\t}\n\tname := p.curToken.Literal\n\n\t// Expect IS\n\tif !p.expectPeek(lexer.IS) {\n\t\treturn nil\n\t}\n\n\t// Parse expression\n\tp.nextToken()\n\tvalue := p.parseExpression(LOWEST)\n\n\t// Expect colon\n\tif !p.expectPeek(lexer.COLON) {\n\t\treturn nil\n\t}\n\n\treturn &ast.Abbreviation{\n\t\tToken:       token,\n\t\tIsVal:       true,\n\t\tIsOpenArray: isOpenArray,\n\t\tType:        typeName,\n\t\tName:        name,\n\t\tValue:       value,\n\t}\n}\n```\n\n**Key points**:\n- Explicit type always captured (`typeName` from token literal)\n- Open array flag set if `[]` precedes type\n- VAL keyword triggers `IsVal = true`\n\n#### INITIAL Declaration Parsing (lines 370-410)\nSimilar structure, but sets `IsInitial = true` and `IsVal = false` (default).\n\n---\n\n### Summary Table: File Locations and Key Functions\n\n| Question | File | Function/Line | Key Detail |\n|----------|------|---------------|-----------|\n| VarDecl type storage | ast/ast.go:36-44 | VarDecl.Type (string) | Explicit type always |\n| Abbreviation type storage | ast/ast.go:484-496 | Abbreviation.Type (string) | Explicit type always |\n| Package-level abbr codegen | codegen/codegen.go:179-190 | Generate() | Uses occamTypeToGo() |\n| Local-scope abbr codegen | codegen/codegen.go:776-781 | generateAbbreviation() | Uses Go type inference (:=) |\n| Type conversion | codegen/codegen.go:1939-1943 | generateExpression() case TypeConversion | Direct cast: `<Type>(<expr>)` |\n| MOSTNEG/MOSTPOS generation | codegen/codegen.go:666-693 | generateMostExpr() | Outputs math.MinInt/MaxInt/etc. |\n| MOSTNEG/MOSTPOS import detection | codegen/codegen.go:519-632 | containsMostExpr() + exprNeedsMath() | Recursive AST scan |\n| goIdent() function | codegen/codegen.go:51-55 | goIdent() | Replaces `.` with `_` |\n| Type mapping | codegen/codegen.go:1155-1180 | occamTypeToGo() | INT→int, BYTE→byte, etc. |\n| Token definitions | lexer/token.go:1-252 | TokenType enum + maps | RETYPES/LONGPROD missing |\n| E2E test framework | codegen/e2e_helpers_test.go:14-62 | transpileCompileRun() | Lexer→Parser→Codegen→Compile→Run |\n| E2E test example | codegen/e2e_basic_test.go:8-18 | TestE2E_PrintInt() | String input, output comparison |\n| Abbreviation parser | parser/parser.go:315-366 | parseAbbreviation() | Explicit type parsing |\n| INITIAL parser | parser/parser.go:370-410 | parseInitialDecl() | Similar to VAL, IsInitial flag |"
  },
  {
    "type": "text",
    "text": "agentId: a7fd81e (for resuming to continue this agent's work if needed)\n<usage>total_tokens: 75622\ntool_uses: 22\nduration_ms: 57384</usage>"
  }
]
[
  {
    "type": "text",
    "text": "Excellent! Now I have all the information I need. Let me provide a comprehensive report:\n\n## Comprehensive Catalog of float_io.occ Language Constructs\n\nI've thoroughly analyzed `/home/david/projects/code-associates/occam2go/kroc/modules/course/libsrc/float_io.occ` (2269 lines). Here are ALL the constructs that need implementation:\n\n---\n\n### 1. RETYPES Declarations (2 occurrences)\n\n**Line 139:** Single-word RETYPES (32-bit float)\n```\n#IF (TARGET.BITS.PER.WORD = 32)\nVAL INT X RETYPES X :\n```\n- Type retyped: `INT` to `INT` (bit-level reinterpretation of X as X)\n- Use case: Type aliasing for bit manipulation\n\n**Line 1105:** Two-word RETYPES (64-bit double)\n```\n#IF (TARGET.BITS.PER.WORD = 32)\nVAL [2]INT X RETYPES X :\n```\n- Type retyped: `[2]INT` to `[2]INT` (two-word array retyped as array)\n- Use case: Type aliasing for 64-bit values on 32-bit systems\n\n---\n\n### 2. Untyped VAL Abbreviations (45 occurrences)\n\nAll 45 are **simple scalar** hex or decimal constants (no array literals):\n\n**Hex scalar constants:**\n- Line 143: `VAL SignBit IS #80000000 :`\n- Line 145: `VAL MaxInt IS #FFFFFFFF :`\n- Line 155: `VAL RealInf IS #7F800000 :`\n- Line 162: `VAL R2L IS #4D10 :`\n- Line 1109: `VAL SignBit IS #80000000 :`\n- Line 1111: `VAL MaxUnsignedInt IS #FFFFFFFF :`\n- Line 1118: `VAL DRealExp IS #7FF :`\n- Line 1120: `VAL DRealRBit IS #400 :`\n- Line 1121: `VAL DRealInf IS #7FF00000 :`\n- Line 1128: `VAL R2L IS #4D10 :`\n\n**Decimal scalar constants:**\n- Line 144: `VAL BitsPerWord IS 32 :`\n- Line 146: `VAL BytesPerWord IS 4 :`\n- Line 149-155: RealExpSh, BitsInFrac, RealExpSh, RealExp, RealXcess, RealRBit (6 constants)\n- Line 159-161: Table10, Bias10, MaxDecN (3 constants)\n- Line 1110, 1112-1127: Similar set for 64-bit (26 total in this section)\n\n---\n\n### 3. VAL Array Literal Abbreviations (4 occurrences)\n\n**Line 178-181:** Single-word array with 14 elements\n```\nVAL PowerTenFrac IS [#80000000, #A0000000, #C8000000, #FA000000,\n                     #9C400000, #C3500000, #F4240000, #98968000,\n                     #BEBC2000, #EE6B2800, #9502F900, #BA43B740,\n                     #E8D4A510, #9184E72A] :\n```\n\n**Line 183:** Integer array with 14 elements\n```\nVAL PowerTenExp IS [0, 3, 6, 9, 13, 16, 19, 23, 26, 29, 33, 36, 39, 43] :\n```\n\n**Line 185:** Single-word array with 3 elements\n```\nVAL BiasTenFrac IS [#9184E72A, #CECB8F28, #EB194F8E] :\n```\n\n**Line 187:** Integer array with 3 elements\n```\nVAL BiasTenExp IS [43, 89, 132] :\n```\n\n**Line 189:** Integer array with 4 elements\n```\nVAL BiasTen IS [14, 28, 41, 54] :\n```\n\n**Lines 1145-1160 (64-bit versions):** Similar arrays, larger (28-element PowerTenFrac, 28-element PowerTenExp, 10-element BiasTenFrac, 5-element BiasTenExp, 5-element BiasTen)\n\n---\n\n### 4. Multi-line Boolean Expressions (2 major occurrences)\n\n**Lines 522-527:** Complex rounding condition\n```\nround.up :=  ( direction = exact ) AND\n             ( ( Buf[digits - 1] = '1' ) OR\n               ( Buf[digits - 1] = '3' ) OR\n               ( Buf[digits - 1] = '5' ) OR\n               ( Buf[digits - 1] = '7' ) OR\n               ( Buf[digits - 1] = '9' ) )\n```\n\n**Lines 754-757 and 779-782:** Complex if condition with nested AND/OR\n```\n( (Ip <> 0) AND (LogX < Ip) ) OR\n  ((Dp = 0) AND\n   (((-max.no.of.zeroes.before.first.significant.digit) - 1) <= LogX) AND\n   (LogX < N))\n```\n\n**Lines 1710-1715:** Similar multi-line boolean to line 522-527 (64-bit version)\n\n---\n\n### 5. Transputer Intrinsic Calls (57 total)\n\n**LONGPROD - 16 occurrences:**\n- Line 242: `Zfrac, Carry := LONGPROD (PowerTenFrac[St], BiasTenFrac[Sb], 0)` — 2-result\n- Line 300: `Xfrac, Carry := LONGPROD (Xfrac, Zfrac, 0)` — 2-result\n- Line 348: `X, low.word := LONGPROD (-X, R2L + 1, 0)` — 2-result\n- Line 352: `LogX, dummy := LONGPROD (X, R2L, 0)` — 2-result\n- Line 1207-1210: Four `LONGPROD` calls in 64-bit multiplication (2-result each)\n- Line 1283-1284: Two `LONGPROD` calls in division (2-result each)\n- Line 1470: `X, low.word := LONGPROD (-X, R2L + 1, 0)` — 2-result\n- Line 1474: `LogX, dummy := LONGPROD (X, R2L, 0)` — 2-result\n\n**LONGDIV - 11 occurrences:**\n- Line 269: `Xfrac, Carry := LONGDIV (Xfrac >> 1, 0, Zfrac)` — 2-result\n- Line 291: `Carry, remainder := LONGDIV( Carry, 0, Zfrac )` — 2-result\n- Line 441: `N, T := LONGDIV (0, N, 10)` — 2-result\n- Line 1279: `Quot, Carry := LONGDIV ( Hi, Lo, Yfrac[1] )` — 2-result\n- Line 1627-1628: Two `LONGDIV` in 64-bit division (2-result each)\n- Line 1471-1472: Two `LONGDIFF` (not LONGDIV, but similar)\n\n**LONGSUM - 9 occurrences:**\n- Line 316: `Carry, Xfrac := LONGSUM (Xfrac, 1, 0)` — 2-result\n- Line 1211-1213: Three `LONGSUM` calls in 64-bit arithmetic (2-result each)\n- Line 1291-1293: Three `LONGSUM` calls in loop (2-result each)\n- Line 1358-1359: Two `LONGSUM` calls (2-result each)\n- Line 1437-1438: Two `LONGSUM` calls (2-result each)\n- Line 1521-1522, 1528-1529, 1533-1534: Three pairs (6 total) in rounding (2-result each)\n\n**LONGDIFF - 11 occurrences:**\n- Line 278 (commented): `Borrow, dummy := LONGDIFF (Carry, Zfrac >> 1, 0)` — 2-result\n- Line 349-350: Two `LONGDIFF` calls (2-result each)\n- Line 738: `Carry, M := LONGDIFF (Xfrac, PowerTenFrac[N], 0)` — 2-result\n- Line 1285-1287: Three `LONGDIFF` in division (2-result each)\n- Line 1471-1472: Two `LONGDIFF` in exponent calc (2-result each)\n- Line 1923-1924, 1939-1940: Four `LONGDIFF` in 64-bit comparison (2-result each)\n\n**NORMALISE - 6 occurrences (3-result signature):**\n- Line 244: `Places, Zfrac, Carry := NORMALISE (Zfrac, Carry)` — 3-result\n- Line 304: `Places, Xfrac, Carry := NORMALISE (Xfrac, Carry)` — 3-result\n- Line 700: `Places, Xfrac, Carry := NORMALISE (Xfrac, 0)` — 3-result\n- Line 1350: `Places, Zfrac[1], dummy := NORMALISE (Zfrac[1], Zfrac[0])` — 3-result\n- Line 1424: `Places, Xfrac[1], dummy := NORMALISE (Xfrac[1], Xfrac[0])` — 3-result\n- Line 1890: `Places, Xfrac[1], Xfrac[0] := NORMALISE (Xfrac[1], Xfrac[0])` — 3-result\n\n**SHIFTRIGHT - 8 occurrences (2-3 result patterns):**\n- Line 343: `dummy, X := SHIFTRIGHT (Xexp, Xfrac << 1, BitsPerWord / 2)` — 2-result\n- Line 379: `Xint, Guard := SHIFTRIGHT (Xfrac, 0, Places)` — 2-result\n- Line 1390: `Xfrac[1], Xfrac[0] := SHIFTRIGHT (Xfrac[1], Xfrac[0], 1)` — 2-result\n- Line 1398 (commented): `Zfrac[1], Zfrac[0] := SHIFTRIGHT (Zfrac[1], Zfrac[0], 1)` — 2-result\n- Line 1465: `dummy, X := SHIFTRIGHT (Xexp, Xfrac[1] << 1, BitsPerWord / 2)` — 2-result\n- Line 1504-1505: Two calls (2-result each)\n- Line 1547: `Xint[0], Guard := SHIFTRIGHT (Xfrac[1], Xfrac[0], Places)` — 2-result\n\n**SHIFTLEFT - 6 occurrences (2-3 result patterns):**\n- Line 409: `ExpExtra, Xfrac := SHIFTLEFT (0, Xint, Places)` — 2-result\n- Line 601: `Xexp, Xfrac := SHIFTLEFT (0, X /\\ (~SignBit), RealShift + 1)` — 2-result\n- Line 1351: `Zfrac[0], Guard := SHIFTLEFT (Zfrac[0], Guard, Places)` — 2-result\n- Line 1425: `Xfrac[0], Guard := SHIFTLEFT (Xfrac[0], Guard, Places)` — 2-result\n- Line 1539: `Carry, dummy := SHIFTLEFT (0, Xint[1], Places)` — 2-result\n- Line 1585: `Carry, Xfrac[1] := SHIFTLEFT (Xint[1], Xint[0], Places)` — 2-result\n- Line 1786: `Xexp, Xfrac[1] := SHIFTLEFT (0, X[1] /\\ (~SignBit), DRealShift + 1)` — 2-result\n- Line 1889, 1894: Two more calls (2-result each)\n- Line 2229: `C, W := SHIFTLEFT (0, W, 4)` — 2-result\n\n---\n\n### 6. CAUSEERROR Calls (2 occurrences)\n\n**Line 988:** Inside `#ELSE` branch (32-bit single precision fallback)\n```\n#ELSE\nCAUSEERROR ()\n#ENDIF\n```\n\n**Line 2187:** Inside `#ELSE` branch (64-bit double precision fallback)\n```\n#ELSE\nCAUSEERROR ()\n#ENDIF\n```\n\nContext: These are reached when `TARGET.BITS.PER.WORD <> 32`, meaning 64-bit or other word sizes not supported.\n\n---\n\n### 7. Other Notable Constructs\n\n**Conditional Compilation:** The entire file is structured around `#IF (TARGET.BITS.PER.WORD = 32)` blocks:\n- Lines 138-989: 32-bit single precision (REAL32)\n- Lines 1104-2189: 64-bit double precision (REAL64)\n\n**Array Indexing:** Extensive use of array indexing with expressions:\n- `PowerTenFrac[St]`, `PowerTenFrac[N]`, `BiasTenFrac[Sb]`\n- `Zfrac[1]`, `Xfrac[0]`, `X[1]`, `Y[0]`\n- `D[0]`, `D[1]`, `D[2]`, `D[3]`\n- `PowerTenFrac[N + N]`, `PowerTenFrac[(N + N) + 1]`\n\n**Nested Array Indexing:** Field access via bracket notation on multi-word values (treating structured data as indexed arrays)\n\n**Comment Syntax:** Extensive use of `--{{{`, `--}}}` for code folding markers (these are just comments and should parse fine)\n\n---\n\n## Summary of Implementation Priority for Phase 2\n\n**Must Implement (Blocking):**\n1. **RETYPES** (2 patterns: `VAL INT X RETYPES X` and `VAL [2]INT X RETYPES X`)\n2. **Transputer intrinsics** (57 calls total):\n   - LONGPROD (16 calls, 2-result)\n   - LONGDIV (11 calls, 2-result)\n   - LONGSUM (9 calls, 2-result)\n   - LONGDIFF (11 calls, 2-result)\n   - NORMALISE (6 calls, 3-result signature)\n   - SHIFTRIGHT (8 calls, 2-result)\n   - SHIFTLEFT (9 calls, 2-result)\n3. **CAUSEERROR()** (2 calls in #ELSE branches)\n\n**Already Implemented:**\n- VAL array literals (45 simple scalar declarations + 6 array literal declarations)\n- Multi-line boolean expressions with AND/OR\n- Array indexing and field access\n- Conditional compilation (#IF blocks)\n- All other occam features used in context\n\nNo PRI ALT, PRI PAR, PLACED PAR, or PORT OF constructs found in this file."
  },
  {
    "type": "text",
    "text": "agentId: ab495da (for resuming to continue this agent's work if needed)\n<usage>total_tokens: 38797\ntool_uses: 24\nduration_ms: 62246</usage>"
  }
]

Good, I have a comprehensive understanding now. Let me look at a few more specific details before writing the plan.

Read
{
  "file_path": "/home/david/projects/code-associates/occam2go/parser/parser.go",
  "offset": 315,
  "limit": 100
}
   315→// parseAbbreviation parses a VAL abbreviation: VAL INT x IS expr:
   316→// Also handles VAL []BYTE x IS "string": (open array abbreviation)
   317→// Current token is VAL.
   318→func (p *Parser) parseAbbreviation() *ast.Abbreviation {
   319→	token := p.curToken // VAL token
   320→
   321→	p.nextToken()
   322→
   323→	// Check for []TYPE (open array abbreviation)
   324→	isOpenArray := false
   325→	if p.curTokenIs(lexer.LBRACKET) && p.peekTokenIs(lexer.RBRACKET) {
   326→		isOpenArray = true
   327→		p.nextToken() // consume ]
   328→		p.nextToken() // move to type
   329→	}
   330→
   331→	// Expect a type keyword
   332→	if !isTypeToken(p.curToken.Type) {
   333→		p.addError(fmt.Sprintf("expected type after VAL, got %s", p.curToken.Type))
   334→		return nil
   335→	}
   336→	typeName := p.curToken.Literal
   337→
   338→	// Expect name
   339→	if !p.expectPeek(lexer.IDENT) {
   340→		return nil
   341→	}
   342→	name := p.curToken.Literal
   343→
   344→	// Expect IS
   345→	if !p.expectPeek(lexer.IS) {
   346→		return nil
   347→	}
   348→
   349→	// Parse expression
   350→	p.nextToken()
   351→	value := p.parseExpression(LOWEST)
   352→
   353→	// Expect colon
   354→	if !p.expectPeek(lexer.COLON) {
   355→		return nil
   356→	}
   357→
   358→	return &ast.Abbreviation{
   359→		Token:       token,
   360→		IsVal:       true,
   361→		IsOpenArray: isOpenArray,
   362→		Type:        typeName,
   363→		Name:        name,
   364→		Value:       value,
   365→	}
   366→}
   367→
   368→// parseInitialDecl parses an INITIAL declaration: INITIAL INT x IS expr:
   369→// Current token is INITIAL.
   370→func (p *Parser) parseInitialDecl() *ast.Abbreviation {
   371→	token := p.curToken // INITIAL token
   372→
   373→	// Expect a type keyword
   374→	p.nextToken()
   375→	if !p.curTokenIs(lexer.INT_TYPE) && !p.curTokenIs(lexer.BYTE_TYPE) &&
   376→		!p.curTokenIs(lexer.BOOL_TYPE) && !p.curTokenIs(lexer.REAL_TYPE) &&
   377→		!p.curTokenIs(lexer.REAL32_TYPE) && !p.curTokenIs(lexer.REAL64_TYPE) {
   378→		p.addError(fmt.Sprintf("expected type after INITIAL, got %s", p.curToken.Type))
   379→		return nil
   380→	}
   381→	typeName := p.curToken.Literal
   382→
   383→	// Expect name
   384→	if !p.expectPeek(lexer.IDENT) {
   385→		return nil
   386→	}
   387→	name := p.curToken.Literal
   388→
   389→	// Expect IS
   390→	if !p.expectPeek(lexer.IS) {
   391→		return nil
   392→	}
   393→
   394→	// Parse expression
   395→	p.nextToken()
   396→	value := p.parseExpression(LOWEST)
   397→
   398→	// Expect colon
   399→	if !p.expectPeek(lexer.COLON) {
   400→		return nil
   401→	}
   402→
   403→	return &ast.Abbreviation{
   404→		Token:     token,
   405→		IsInitial: true,
   406→		Type:      typeName,
   407→		Name:      name,
   408→		Value:     value,
   409→	}
   410→}
   411→
   412→func (p *Parser) parseAssignment() *ast.Assignment {
   413→	stmt := &ast.Assignment{
   414→		Name: p.curToken.Literal,
Read
{
  "file_path": "/home/david/projects/code-associates/occam2go/kroc/modules/course/libsrc/float_io.occ",
  "offset": 515,
  "limit": 20
}
   515→                -- and digit before 5 is odd; else leave as is
   516→                IF
   517→                  digits = 0
   518→                    round.up := FALSE
   519→                  direction = rounded.down
   520→                    round.up := TRUE
   521→                  TRUE
   522→                    round.up :=  ( direction = exact ) AND
   523→                                 ( ( Buf[digits - 1] = '1' ) OR
   524→                                   ( Buf[digits - 1] = '3' ) OR
   525→                                   ( Buf[digits - 1] = '5' ) OR
   526→                                   ( Buf[digits - 1] = '7' ) OR
   527→                                   ( Buf[digits - 1] = '9' ) )
   528→              TRUE
   529→                round.up := Buf[digits] >= '5'
   530→            --}}}
   531→            IF
   532→              round.up
   533→                --{{{  round up
   534→                SEQ
Read
{
  "file_path": "/home/david/projects/code-associates/occam2go/kroc/modules/course/libsrc/float_io.occ",
  "offset": 748,
  "limit": 40
}
   748→                  SKIP
   749→              --}}}
   750→              WriteDec (Buf, Places, Xint)              --get number string
   751→              --{{{  output the string in the correct format
   752→              --{{{  fractional mode
   753→              IF
   754→                ( (Ip <> 0) AND (LogX < Ip) ) OR
   755→                  ((Dp = 0) AND
   756→                   (((-max.no.of.zeroes.before.first.significant.digit) - 1) <= LogX) AND
   757→                   (LogX < N))
   758→                  --{{{  try to output in mmm.nnnn form
   759→                  SEQ
   760→                    --{{{  possibly restrict
   761→                    M := (Dp + LogX) + 1                --current estimate at actual field width
   762→                    IF
   763→                      M < 0                             --must ensure that M >= 0
   764→                        M := 0
   765→                      TRUE
   766→                        SKIP
   767→                    #PRAGMA DEFINED Buf
   768→                    SEQ i = 0 FOR Places
   769→                      Buf.1[i] := Buf[i]
   770→                    Places.1 := Places
   771→                    LogX.1 := LogX
   772→                    IF
   773→                      Dp <> 0                           --fixed point if possible
   774→                        restrict (Buf.1, Places.1, LogX.1, M, round.direction)
   775→                      TRUE                              --free format
   776→                        SKIP
   777→                    --}}}
   778→                    IF
   779→                      ( (Ip <> 0) AND (LogX.1 < Ip) ) OR
   780→                        ((Dp = 0) AND
   781→                         (((-max.no.of.zeroes.before.first.significant.digit) - 1) <= LogX.1) AND
   782→                         (LogX.1 < N))
   783→                        --{{{  output in mmm.nnnn form
   784→                        SEQ
   785→                          --{{{  set Scale
   786→                          IF
   787→                            LogX.1 < 0                  --always 0decimal.point
Thinking

Now I can see the multi-line expression issue. Lines 522-527 show:

round.up :=  ( direction = exact ) AND
             ( ( Buf[digits - 1] = '1' ) OR
               ( Buf[digits - 1] = '3' ) OR
               ( Buf[digits - 1] = '5' ) OR
               ( Buf[digits - 1] = '7' ) OR
               ( Buf[digits - 1] = '9' ) )

And lines 754-757:

( (Ip <> 0) AND (LogX < Ip) ) OR


The issue is that when the right-hand side of an assignment starts with an opening parenthesis, the lexer suppresses INDENT/DEDENT/NEWLINE tokens while inside those parens. Once the first closing paren is reached after ( direction = exact ), the parenthesis depth returns to zero, so the AND operator on that same line triggers a NEWLINE token before the next line's indentation is processed.

The parser then recursively calls parseExpression for the RHS of AND, but it encounters a NEWLINE token first, followed by INDENT tokens on line 523. The question is whether the parser correctly handles this sequence and recognizes the opening paren on line 523 as the start of the next expression, or if the NEWLINE/INDENT tokens cause it to fail. After AND, the parser encounters a NEWLINE token, then an INDENT on the next line since the opening parenthesis is indented deeper than the assignment statement. So when parseExpression tries to parse the RHS of AND, it immediately sees NEWLINE followed by INDENT, which would cause the parse to fail unless the parser handles line continuations across indentation boundaries. Looking at the IF statement structure, the opening parenthesis on line 754 starts the condition, and I'm tracking how the parentheses nest as the expression continues across multiple lines — opening for subexpressions like (Ip <> 0) and (LogX < Ip), then closing them back out before the OR operator connects the next clause. So the real issue is that when a binary operator like AND or OR appears at the end of a line, the parser needs to know the next line is a continuation, not a new statement—and the simplest fix is to skip NEWLINE and INDENT tokens immediately after binary operators so the right-hand side can be parsed correctly.

But I need to be careful here because indentation is meaningful in occam. If the next line is dedented back to the original level or less, the expression should end. The key is that after consuming a binary operator, I skip the NEWLINE/INDENT, and then when the DEDENT comes later, it naturally terminates the expression since it won't match any infix operator pattern.

Let me trace through what happens with a concrete example to make sure this approach actually works. I'm realizing the simpler approach is to treat NEWLINE as a statement terminator, but allow expressions to continue across lines when they end with a binary operator. So if a line ends with AND, OR, or another infix operator, the parser should keep consuming tokens from the next line rather than stopping at the NEWLINE.

The challenge is handling the INDENT/DEDENT tokens that come with the continuation—if I skip an INDENT, the matching DEDENT will still appear later and cause problems. I need to either track these tokens carefully or find a way to peek ahead past the whitespace tokens to determine if the expression should actually continue. operator is the last thing on the line, and the next non-NEWLINE/INDENT token is a valid expression start (LPAREN, IDENT, literal, etc.), skip the NEWLINE/INDENT tokens.

Actually, I think the cleanest approach is to handle this at the expression parser level: after consuming a binary operator, if the current token is NEWLINE (possibly followed by INDENT), skip those tokens. We need to track the INDENT so we know when the continuation ends.

Hmm, but the lexer's indent tracking is already complex. Let me look at how Python handles this — Python doesn't need to handle this because it requires explicit line continuation with \ or has implicit continuation inside brackets/parens.

Actually, in occam, the rule is simpler: expressions can span multiple lines when the continuation line is more indented. But our lexer emits INDENT/DEDENT for those indentation changes.

Looking at the actual problem cases, multi-line expressions show up in two places: assignment right-hand sides and IF conditions. In the IF condition example around lines 754-757, the expression continues across lines with increased indentation. The IF parser expects a boolean expression, and it naturally continues to the next indented line.

I think the simplest fix that matches occam semantics is to skip NEWLINE tokens in the expression parser right after consuming a binary operator, though handling INDENT/DEDENT properly is more involved. I need to trace through the parenthesis depth more carefully—after the closing paren on line 522, parenDepth drops back to 0, so a NEWLINE token gets emitted. Then on line 523, since we're at a deeper indentation level, an INDENT token follows before the continuation of the expression.

Now I'm checking whether square brackets also increment the parenthesis depth counter in the lexer, or if only parentheses do. The documentation mentions suppressing INDENT/DEDENT/NEWLINE tokens when inside parentheses, but I need to verify the actual lexer implementation to see if bracket nesting is handled the same way.

Let me step back and map out what needs to change: I need to add several new keywords to the lexer, then figure out the bracket depth tracking for multi-line array literals.

For the AST, I'll need nodes for retypes declarations, array literals, and handling for untyped abbreviations. The parser will need updates to handle the new abbreviation forms and array syntax in expressions.

Now I'm working through the codegen side—translating retypes into Go's bit conversion functions, array literals into Go slice syntax, and adding helper functions for the transputer intrinsics like LONGPROD and LONGDIV. I'll also need to handle CAUSEERROR as a panic call.

For the intrinsics themselves, I need to understand their signatures: LONGPROD does extended multiplication returning high and low 32-bit words, LONGDIV handles 64-bit division by a 32-bit divisor, LONGSUM and LONGDIFF manage addition and subtraction with carry/borrow propagation, and NORMALISE counts leading zeros while normalizing the result.

Now looking at how these work in practice—they all return multiple values through multi-assignment, so the parser needs to handle cases like a, b := LONGPROD(x, y, z). The existing multi-assignment parsing should work if these intrinsics are treated as regular function calls, but I need to verify the parser actually recognizes them correctly when it encounters the comma after the first identifier. generate the appropriate Go helper function calls. The simpler approach is to keep intrinsics as regular identifiers rather than keywords, so the codegen can recognize them by name without needing parser changes. Since the lexer won't treat them as keywords, they'll stay as IDENT tokens and parse naturally as function calls.

Now I'm realizing the RETYPES case is different—it's actually a keyword that replaces IS in the abbreviation syntax, so the parser needs to distinguish VAL <type> <name> RETYPES <expr> from the untyped form VAL <name> IS <expr>. For the untyped abbreviation, the parser should check if the token after VAL is an identifier rather than a type keyword, then parse accordingly.

For array literals like [expr, expr, ...], I need to handle them alongside the existing slice expression parsing. The key is distinguishing between [arr FROM n FOR m] (slice) and [expr, expr, ...] (array literal) by checking what comes after the first expression—if it's a comma, it's an array literal; if it's FROM, it's a slice.

Now for multi-line expressions, the challenge is handling continuations after binary operators across newlines. When I see a binary operator followed by a newline, I should skip the newline to allow the expression to continue on the next line. This applies to both assignment RHS and IF conditions that span multiple lines. The cleanest approach is to peek ahead after consuming a binary operator and skip any newlines before parsing the next operand. I could handle this at the lexer level by suppressing NEWLINE and INDENT/DEDENT tokens when a line ends with a binary operator, similar to how Python handles implicit line continuation—but the lexer lacks expression context to know when to do this. Instead, I should track continuation in the parser itself: after consuming a binary operator, skip any NEWLINE and INDENT tokens, parse the RHS, then skip matching DEDENT tokens. The tricky part is that indentation structure on continuation lines might be complex and not perfectly match what was skipped. Looking at the actual multi-line expressions in float_io.occ, they seem to follow a simpler pattern that I should examine more closely. I'm realizing the key insight here: after a binary operator, if we encounter a NEWLINE token, the expression must continue on the next line. So in the parser's expression handling, I should skip NEWLINE and INDENT tokens that appear right after an operator, then manage the corresponding DEDENTs once the full expression is parsed. Let me refine this by handling it directly in the binary expression parsing logic, skipping newlines after consuming an operator before parsing the right-hand side. I'm looking at how multi-line conditions work in occam—the condition can span multiple lines with proper indentation, and the parser needs to distinguish between continuation of the condition versus the start of the process body. The key is that once the condition expression is complete, any DEDENT signals the end of the condition and the beginning of the process. I'm tracing through the parenthesis depth tracking more carefully—when we hit line 754 with the opening parenthesis, depth increases to 1, and as we process the tokens through the AND and closing paren, we're back at depth 0 by the time we reach OR and the newline, so the newline does get emitted. Then on line 755, we have an INDENT token followed by another opening paren that pushes depth back to 1, and I need to continue tracking how the nested parentheses affect whether subsequent newlines are suppressed. I need to trace through the parenthesis depth more carefully across these lines. After line 754 closes with OR, the depth returns to 0 and a newline is emitted. Then line 755 starts a new indented block with nested parentheses around Dp = 0, keeping the depth at 1 by the end of the line. Line 756 continues the expression at depth 1, and line 757 closes everything out with the final parentheses bringing depth back to 0. Tracing through the parentheses more carefully, I see the issue is actually isolated to the transition between lines 754 and 755—line 754 ends with OR at depth 0, which creates the multi-line expression problem, while lines 755 through 757 form a complete nested structure that stays within parentheses and properly suppresses newlines.

The same pattern appears in lines 522-523: AND at the end of line 522 at depth 0, followed by a line starting with ( where the newline and indentation should be skipped. Once inside those parentheses, subsequent newlines are correctly suppressed.

The fix is straightforward—when the parser encounters a binary operator at the end of a line, it needs to skip over any following newline and indentation tokens to continue parsing the expression on the next line, rather than treating the newline as a statement terminator.

Now I'm realizing the tricky part: when we skip an indent token in the expression parser, there's a matching dedent coming later that the outer parser won't expect. The outer parser tracks indentation levels and assumes indent/dedent pairs are balanced, so if the expression parser consumes an indent, the dedent will appear orphaned from the outer parser's perspective. I need to think through how the if statement parser actually manages indentation to see if this creates a real problem or if the dedent just gets handled naturally when the expression parser returns.

Let me trace through what actually happens with the token stream for that multi-line condition — the if token starts the block, then there's an indent for the body, and the condition itself spans multiple lines with its own indent level for the continuation, followed by newlines and closing parentheses. I'm realizing the indentation tracking is more nuanced than I initially thought—the lexer counts raw spaces rather than indent levels, which means a line with 19 spaces doesn't necessarily represent a clean half-level. Let me reconsider how occam's 2-space indentation scheme actually maps to the token stream. I need to check how the lexer actually handles odd spacing before getting too deep into this. Let me step back and try a simpler solution: in the infix loop of parseExpression, I'll skip NEWLINE tokens before checking for infix operators. This way, multi-line expressions can continue naturally without needing complex continuation depth tracking.

But wait—that won't work because NEWLINE is what signals the end of an expression. The real issue is that after a binary operator, I need to skip over NEWLINE and INDENT tokens to reach the next operand, but I can't just blindly skip all NEWLINEs in expression context. Let me reconsider the approach: maybe I should only skip NEWLINE when it directly follows a binary operator, so the parser knows to keep looking for the right-hand side of the expression. I need to handle newlines and indentation after binary operators in the parser. The solution is to skip over NEWLINE and INDENT tokens in parseBinaryExpr right after advancing past the operator, tracking indentation depth as we go, before parsing the right-hand side expression.

But I'm realizing this approach has a problem—consuming DEDENTs at the end of parseExpression is fragile since sub-expressions might consume them first. The real issue is that skipping INDENTs without properly tracking them will throw off the parser's indentation level counter, which gets decremented when DEDENTs are processed. I need to reconsider how the indentation tracking actually works in the lexer and parser.

Looking at how nextToken manages indentation, it increments indentLevel when it sees an INDENT token and decrements it for DEDENT tokens. Since the lexer generates balanced INDENT/DEDENT pairs, as long as I consume both through nextToken, the indentation level should stay in sync. The question is figuring out who's responsible for consuming these tokens in the expression parsing flow.

When parsing an IF condition that spans multiple lines with continuation, the expression parser might skip over an INDENT token to handle the continuation, but then the matching DEDENT could be misinterpreted by the outer IF parser as the end of the condition block rather than just the end of the expression continuation. Let me trace through what happens: after the IF token, there's an INDENT for the condition level, then the condition expression with a NEWLINE, then another INDENT for continuation, more condition tokens, another NEWLINE, then a DEDENT back to the condition level, and finally an INDENT for the body. The tricky part is making sure the DEDENT that closes the continuation gets consumed by the expression parser and not left for the IF parser to interpret as a structural boundary. I'm working through the indentation levels and token flow here. After the condition closes, we're back at the base indent level, then we need to handle the process body which sits at a deeper indent. The key question is whether the expression parser should consume the dedent token that marks the end of the continuation, or if that should be left for the IF parser to handle when it encounters the next indent for the process body. 0), we consume DEDENTs.

Actually, let me think about this from the parseBinaryExpr perspective:

  1. In parseExpression, infix loop detects OR operator
  2. Advances to OR, calls parseBinaryExpr
  3. parseBinaryExpr: curToken = OR, saves operator info
  4. nextToken() → NEWLINE.
  5. Skip NEWLINE: nextToken() → INDENT (indentLevel++)
  6. Skip INDENT: nextToken() → LPAREN
  7. Now parse RHS expression: ((Dp = 0) AND ... (LogX < N))
  8. Inside the parens, NEWLINE is suppressed by lexer
  9. After ))at end of line 757, parseExpression returns the RHS
  10. parseBinaryExpr creates BinaryExpr(left, OR, right)

Back in the outer parseExpression's infix loop, the current token is now the closing paren from line 757. The lexer emits a NEWLINE since we're at the end of the line with parenDepth at 0, followed by a DEDENT or INDENT depending on the next line's indentation. The infix loop checks peekPrecedence, but NEWLINE has no precedence, so it exits and returns the full condition expression. However, we've got an unmatched INDENT from step 5 that incremented indentLevel, and it won't be properly consumed until the DEDENT comes through nextToken(). The IF parser continues from here with an inflated indentLevel.

Now I need to look at how the IF parser handles the condition and what comes next. I should also examine the RETYPES construct, which appears to declare type reinterpretations for procedure parameters.

RETYPES lets you shadow a parameter with a different type interpretation—so a REAL32 parameter can be rebound as an INT by reinterpreting its bit pattern. For 64-bit floats, this would use a two-element integer array instead.

Now I'm looking at how the occam code actually accesses these reinterpreted bits—it's treating the float64 as two 32-bit words in little-endian order, where X[0] holds the low word and X[1] holds the high word, then performing bit operations like shifts and masks to extract the exponent and mantissa. I'm working through how to handle the RETYPES operation in Go, where I need to reinterpret the float32 bits as an integer and then use that integer representation for subsequent operations. The challenge is that the occam code reuses the variable name X, so I need to figure out whether to shadow it in a new scope or use a different variable name in the generated code. I see that the current rewritten thinking ends with code, so I should switch to prose now. The next thinking discusses how VAL variables work in Go (they're read-only like constants), and then moves into thinking about array literals and type inference.

Here's the rewritten continuation:

Since VAL is read-only like a constant, creating a local array copy with := works fine for the shadowing case. Now I'm thinking through how array literals translate—when you have an untyped array literal, Go infers the type from context, so I can use a slice literal with the hex values and let the type system figure it out.

For parsing, I need to distinguish between array literals like [expr, expr, ...] and the existing slice syntax [arr FROM start FOR length]. The key difference is what comes after the opening bracket: if I see an expression followed by a comma, it's an array literal, but if I see an identifier followed by FROM or FOR, it's a slice. The tricky part is that I need to look ahead after parsing the first expression to know which path to take. So the issue is that when the parser encounters [ followed by an expression and then a comma, it needs to recognize this as an array literal rather than trying to parse it as a slice. My approach is to check what comes after the first expression: if it's a comma, parse it as an array literal with comma-separated values; if it's FROM or FOR, treat it as a slice expression. Let me trace through the current slice parsing to understand how it handles this, then I'll map out the implementation order starting with the lexer changes and AST node definitions.

Now I'm laying out the implementation sequence: adding the RETYPES keyword to the lexer, defining the new AST nodes, then tackling the parser fixes for untyped VAL abbreviations and array literals, followed by the RETYPES declarations and multi-line expression handling, and finally the codegen work for each feature with end-to-end tests to verify everything works together.

I'm realizing the transputer intrinsics like LONGPROD don't actually need parser changes—they can stay as regular identifiers and just get special codegen handling to call Go helper functions. Same with CAUSEERROR, which can just generate a panic call. But I should check whether those multi-line array literals need special handling to suppress newlines at the bracket level.

Looking at the PowerTenFrac array that spans several lines, the lexer currently only suppresses newlines inside parentheses, not brackets. I could either add separate bracket depth tracking or reuse the paren depth counter for both () and [] like Python does. Though I'm wondering if suppressing newlines inside [...] would cause problems with array indexing syntax.

Actually, array indexing is typically single-line anyway, so the suppression shouldn't cause issues. Using the same depth counter for both parentheses and brackets seems like the cleanest approach and matches Python's behavior.

Now I need to think through how the transputer intrinsics map to Go, particularly the LONGPROD operation that multiplies two 32-bit values and adds a carry-in, returning the high and low 32-bit parts of the result.

Defining the remaining intrinsics...

Now I'm working through the borrow semantics for LONGDIFF—when a subtraction underflows, the borrow_out needs to correctly signal that, and I'm checking how the upper bits of the result indicate whether we've gone negative. Writing the LONGDIFF function...

Now I'm thinking through the NORMALISE function, which will need to handle the high and low parts of a number.

Implementing bit shift operations...

Now I'm thinking about where these helper functions would live—either emitted directly into the generated Go code when the transpiler encounters intrinsic usage, or tucked into a separate utility package.

The codegen would recognize intrinsic calls by looking at the structure of the code: when it sees a multi-assignment like a, b := LONGPROD(x, y, z), it identifies the function call by name and generates the corresponding helper invocation. The same pattern applies to CAUSEERROR() at the statement level, which would transpile to a panic.

I think I have a solid grasp of what needs to be implemented now, so I should start drafting the implementation plan. Though there's one more aspect I should consider before diving in—

where these generated helper functions should live in the output file and how to track which ones are actually needed. They should go at the package level after imports, and I can use flags during the AST scan to mark which helpers are required, then emit only those during code generation rather than doing a fragile string search on the output.

For CAUSEERROR(), I'm checking the preprocessor logic—it's inside an #ELSE block that gets excluded when TARGET.BITS.PER.WORD = 32 is true, so it's actually preprocessed out, but I should still handle it for completeness.

Now let me look at the parser's expression LBRACKET handling and the IF statement parsing.

Grep
{
  "pattern": "case lexer\\.LBRACKET",
  "path": "/home/david/projects/code-associates/occam2go/parser/parser.go",
  "output_mode": "content",
  "-C": 3
}
170-			return p.parseFuncDecl()
171-		}
172-		return p.parseVarDeclOrAbbreviation()
173:	case lexer.LBRACKET:
174-		return p.parseArrayDecl()
175-	case lexer.CHAN:
176-		return p.parseChanDecl()
--
2588-			Operator: "~",
2589-			Right:    p.parseExpression(PREFIX),
2590-		}
2591:	case lexer.LBRACKET:
2592-		/ Slice expression: [arr FROM start FOR length] or [arr FOR length]
2593-		lbracket := p.curToken
2594-		p.nextToken() // move past [
--
2666-			lexer.BITAND, lexer.BITOR, lexer.BITXOR, lexer.LSHIFT, lexer.RSHIFT:
2667-			p.nextToken()
2668-			left = p.parseBinaryExpr(left)
2669:		case lexer.LBRACKET:
2670-			p.nextToken()
2671-			left = p.parseIndexExpression(left)
2672-		default:
Grep
{
  "pattern": "parenDepth",
  "path": "/home/david/projects/code-associates/occam2go/lexer/lexer.go",
  "output_mode": "content",
  "-C": 2
}
19-
20-	/ Parenthesis depth: suppress INDENT/DEDENT/NEWLINE inside (...)
21:	parenDepth int
22-}
23-
--
66-		currentIndent := l.indentStack[len(l.indentStack)-1]
67-
68:		if l.parenDepth > 0 {
69-			/ Inside parentheses: suppress INDENT/DEDENT tokens
70-			// (don't modify indentStack — resume normal tracking after close paren)
--
94-	switch l.ch {
95-	case '(':
96:		l.parenDepth++
97-		tok = l.newToken(LPAREN, l.ch)
98-	case ')':
99:		if l.parenDepth > 0 {
100:			l.parenDepth--
101-		}
102-		tok = l.newToken(RPAREN, l.ch)
--
218-			}
219-		}
220:		if l.parenDepth > 0 {
221-			/ Inside parentheses: suppress NEWLINE, get next real token
222-			return l.NextToken()
Read
{
  "file_path": "/home/david/projects/code-associates/occam2go/parser/parser.go",
  "offset": 2591,
  "limit": 40
}
  2591→	case lexer.LBRACKET:
  2592→		// Slice expression: [arr FROM start FOR length] or [arr FOR length]
  2593→		lbracket := p.curToken
  2594→		p.nextToken() // move past [
  2595→		arrayExpr := p.parseExpression(LOWEST)
  2596→		var startExpr ast.Expression
  2597→		if p.peekTokenIs(lexer.FOR) {
  2598→			// [arr FOR length] shorthand — start is 0
  2599→			startExpr = &ast.IntegerLiteral{Token: lexer.Token{Type: lexer.INT, Literal: "0"}, Value: 0}
  2600→		} else {
  2601→			if !p.expectPeek(lexer.FROM) {
  2602→				return nil
  2603→			}
  2604→			p.nextToken() // move past FROM
  2605→			startExpr = p.parseExpression(LOWEST)
  2606→		}
  2607→		if !p.expectPeek(lexer.FOR) {
  2608→			return nil
  2609→		}
  2610→		p.nextToken() // move past FOR
  2611→		lengthExpr := p.parseExpression(LOWEST)
  2612→		if !p.expectPeek(lexer.RBRACKET) {
  2613→			return nil
  2614→		}
  2615→		left = &ast.SliceExpr{
  2616→			Token:  lbracket,
  2617→			Array:  arrayExpr,
  2618→			Start:  startExpr,
  2619→			Length: lengthExpr,
  2620→		}
  2621→	case lexer.SIZE_KW:
  2622→		token := p.curToken
  2623→		p.nextToken()
  2624→		left = &ast.SizeExpr{
  2625→			Token: token,
  2626→			Expr:  p.parseExpression(PREFIX),
  2627→		}
  2628→	case lexer.MOSTNEG_KW, lexer.MOSTPOS_KW:
  2629→		token := p.curToken
  2630→		isNeg := token.Type == lexer.MOSTNEG_KW
Read
{
  "file_path": "/home/david/projects/code-associates/occam2go/parser/parser.go",
  "offset": 2650,
  "limit": 50
}
  2650→			Expr:       p.parseExpression(PREFIX),
  2651→		}
  2652→	default:
  2653→		p.addError(fmt.Sprintf("unexpected token in expression: %s", p.curToken.Type))
  2654→		return nil
  2655→	}
  2656→
  2657→	// Parse infix expressions
  2658→	for !p.peekTokenIs(lexer.NEWLINE) && !p.peekTokenIs(lexer.EOF) &&
  2659→		precedence < p.peekPrecedence() {
  2660→
  2661→		switch p.peekToken.Type {
  2662→		case lexer.PLUS, lexer.MINUS, lexer.MULTIPLY, lexer.DIVIDE, lexer.MODULO,
  2663→			lexer.PLUS_KW, lexer.MINUS_KW, lexer.TIMES,
  2664→			lexer.EQ, lexer.NEQ, lexer.LT, lexer.GT, lexer.LE, lexer.GE,
  2665→			lexer.AND, lexer.OR, lexer.AFTER,
  2666→			lexer.BITAND, lexer.BITOR, lexer.BITXOR, lexer.LSHIFT, lexer.RSHIFT:
  2667→			p.nextToken()
  2668→			left = p.parseBinaryExpr(left)
  2669→		case lexer.LBRACKET:
  2670→			p.nextToken()
  2671→			left = p.parseIndexExpression(left)
  2672→		default:
  2673→			return left
  2674→		}
  2675→	}
  2676→
  2677→	return left
  2678→}
  2679→
  2680→func (p *Parser) parseBinaryExpr(left ast.Expression) ast.Expression {
  2681→	expr := &ast.BinaryExpr{
  2682→		Token:    p.curToken,
  2683→		Left:     left,
  2684→		Operator: p.curToken.Literal,
  2685→	}
  2686→
  2687→	prec := p.curPrecedence()
  2688→	p.nextToken()
  2689→	expr.Right = p.parseExpression(prec)
  2690→
  2691→	return expr
  2692→}
  2693→
Thinking

Now I have a very thorough understanding. Let me look at the parseBinaryExpr function at line 2680. After it calls p.nextToken() (advancing past the operator to the RHS), it calls p.parseExpression(prec). If the next token after the operator is NEWLINE, it would be the next line. In the infix loop, the loop condition checks !p.peekTokenIs(lexer.NEWLINE), so if the peek token is NEWLINE, the loop exits immediately without trying to parse any more infix operators.

So the multi-line expression issue is clear: the infix loop at line 2658 stops when it sees NEWLINE as peek token. And in parseBinaryExpr at line 2688, p.nextToken() moves past the operator, and if the next token is NEWLINE, p.parseExpression(prec) would see NEWLINE as the current token and fail with "unexpected token in expression: NEWLINE".

The fix should skip NEWLINE and INDENT tokens after consuming the operator in parseBinaryExpr. But the infix loop's peek-level NEWLINE check also prevents seeing operators on the next line, so I need to decide whether to handle continuation only within parseBinaryExpr or modify the loop condition itself.

Looking at the actual code structure, operators like AND and OR appear at the end of the current line, not the start of the next one—the RHS operand is what continues on the next line. So the infix loop should still detect the operator before hitting NEWLINE. The real question is what happens after nextToken() consumes the operator: does it land on NEWLINE, INDENT, or the start of the RHS expression?

Let me trace through the token sequence... I see the issue now—when the parser encounters the AND operator, it correctly identifies it as an infix operator and tries to parse the right side of the expression. But after consuming AND, the next token is NEWLINE, which isn't a valid prefix for an expression, causing the parser to fail with an unexpected token error.

The fix is to skip over NEWLINE and INDENT tokens in parseBinaryExpr before attempting to parse the right operand, so the parser can reach the actual expression on the next line. This way the DEDENT token that comes later will be left unconsumed for the statement parser to handle.

Now I need to trace through what happens after the parenthesized expression completes—specifically, whether the outer parser will correctly process the DEDENT token that gets emitted when the indented block ends. After the closing parentheses, parseExpression returns the complete AND expression and control flows back to parseAssignment. The parser then needs to handle the DEDENT token that follows, since the indented continuation block (lines 523-527) is about to end. The block parsing logic captures the starting indent level and checks for DEDENT tokens to know when to stop, but I'm concerned about whether the temporary indent level increase from expression continuation could cause the parser to miss when a block actually ends. Let me trace through this more carefully to see if there's a real issue with how indent levels are being tracked across nested contexts. After parseAssignment returns, the cursor sits at the ) token, and parseBlockStatements needs to skip past any newlines before processing the next statement. The real concern is that when we skip INDENT tokens during expression continuation, the indentLevel increments, and if the outer block parser encounters the matching DEDENT before the statement fully completes, it could prematurely terminate the block—so I need to ensure DEDENT tokens are consumed at the right scope level during implementation.

I'm thinking the safest approach is to explicitly track indentation depth within parseBinaryExpr...

Handling multi-line expressions...

But I'm realizing this assumes the DEDENT comes immediately after the expression, which works for the simple case where we have NEWLINE then DEDENT. However, I need to consider what happens with nested continuation levels—multiple indentation layers that would require matching multiple DEDENTs.

Let me trace through a more complex example with multiple levels of indentation to see if the approach handles it correctly. When parsing something like a AND c OR d across multiple indentation levels, each recursive call to parseBinaryExpr would need to consume its own INDENT/DEDENT pair, and the nesting should work out as long as each level properly tracks and consumes its indentation changes. work! The key is that each parseBinaryExpr handles its own level of continuation.

OK, I'm confident this approach works. Let me write the plan now.

Actually, one more thing I want to check. After the DEDENT consumption, what's the current/peek token state? Let me think...After consuming the inner DEDENT in the above example: - curToken = DEDENT (from p.nextToken() which consumed it) - peek token = NEWLINE (for the next line)

Then back in the outer parseBinaryExpr, we check: - p.peekTokenIs(lexer.NEWLINE) → true, p.nextToken() → curToken = NEWLINE - p.peekTokenIs(lexer.DEDENT) → true, p.nextToken() → curToken = DEDENT (outer one) - contIndent goes to 0

Then return. curToken = DEDENT. Back in the infix loop of the outermost parseExpression: - peekToken = ? (whatever follows the outer DEDENT)

The infix loop checks !p.peekTokenIs(lexer.NEWLINE) and precedence < p.peekPrecedence(). If peekToken is NEWLINE or another non-operator, the loop exits.

This looks correct. But wait, I made an error. After consuming the DEDENT, curToken is DEDENT. The infix loop in parseExpression is checking p.peekToken, not p.curToken. So the cursor is on DEDENT and peek is the next token. Let me re-examine the infix loop logic to make sure the token positions are right. Verifying the single-line case works correctly—when there's no continuation, the indent loop doesn't execute and we just parse the right side and return, so no behavior changes there. Now I'm ready to write out the plan.

Now I have a thorough understanding of all the moving parts. Let me launch a Plan agent to consolidate the design.

Task
Design Phase 2 implementation plan
{
  "subagent_type": "Plan",
  "prompt": "Design a detailed implementation plan for Phase 2 of the occam2go transpiler. The goal is to transpile the full course module including float_io.occ.\n\n## Context\n\nThe occam2go transpiler at /home/david/projects/code-associates/occam2go currently transpiles `course_nofloat.module` cleanly. The full `course.module` fails because `float_io.occ` uses constructs not yet implemented. Running the transpiler produces 598 parse errors.\n\n## Required Features (from analysis of float_io.occ)\n\n### 1. Untyped VAL Abbreviations (45 occurrences)\nCurrent parser (`parser/parser.go:318-366`) expects `VAL <type> <name> IS <expr> :` but float_io.occ has `VAL <name> IS <expr> :` (no type keyword). Examples:\n- `VAL SignBit IS #80000000 :`\n- `VAL BitsPerWord IS 32 :`\n\n**Fix**: In `parseAbbreviation()`, after `p.nextToken()` past VAL, if curToken is IDENT (not a type token), treat it as untyped: `VAL <name> IS <expr> :`. Set `Type = \"\"` in the Abbreviation AST node.\n\n**Codegen** (`codegen/codegen.go`): Local abbreviations already use `:=` (Go type inference), so empty type works. Package-level abbreviations (`codegen.go:179-190`) need a special case: when Type is empty, omit the explicit Go type and use `var name = expr` instead of `var name type = expr`.\n\n### 2. Array Literal Expressions (~10 occurrences)\nFloat_io.occ has multi-line array literals:\n```\nVAL PowerTenFrac IS [#80000000, #A0000000, #C8000000, ...] :\n```\n\n**Parser**: The LBRACKET case in `parseExpression()` (`parser.go:2591`) currently only handles slice expressions `[arr FROM n FOR m]`. Need to detect array literals: after parsing the first expression inside `[`, if followed by COMMA, it's an array literal. If followed by FROM/FOR, it's a slice.\n\n**New AST node**: `ArrayLiteral` with `Elements []Expression` field.\n\n**Codegen**: Generate `[]int{expr, expr, ...}`. Type can be inferred from elements.\n\n**Lexer**: Multi-line array literals need NEWLINE suppression inside `[...]`. Currently only `(...)` suppresses NEWLINE via `parenDepth`. Add `[` and `]` tracking to the same parenDepth counter (matching Python's behavior where `()`, `[]`, `{}` all suppress newlines).\n\n### 3. RETYPES Declarations (2 occurrences)\n```\nVAL INT X RETYPES X :         -- line 139: REAL32 → INT bit reinterpretation\nVAL [2]INT X RETYPES X :      -- line 1105: REAL64 → [2]INT bit reinterpretation\n```\n\n**Lexer**: Add RETYPES keyword token.\n\n**AST**: New `RetypesDecl` node with fields: `IsVal bool`, `TargetType string`, `IsArray bool`, `ArraySize int`, `Name string`, `Source string`.\n\n**Parser**: In `parseAbbreviation()`, after parsing `VAL <type> <name>`, if next token is RETYPES (instead of IS), parse as RetypesDecl.\n\n**Codegen**:\n- `VAL INT X RETYPES X :` (REAL32→INT): `X := int(math.Float32bits(X))`\n- `VAL [2]INT X RETYPES X :` (REAL64→[2]INT): `_tmp := math.Float64bits(X); X := [2]int{int(uint32(_tmp)), int(uint32(_tmp >> 32))}`\n\nNeeds `math` and `math/bits` imports.\n\n### 4. Multi-line Expression Continuation\nExpressions span multiple lines after binary operators:\n```\nround.up := ( direction = exact ) AND\n            ( ( Buf[digits - 1] = '1' ) OR ... )\n```\n\n**Problem**: In `parseBinaryExpr()` (`parser.go:2680-2692`), after the operator is consumed (`p.nextToken()` at line 2688), the next token is NEWLINE (end of line). `parseExpression(prec)` then fails on NEWLINE.\n\n**Fix**: In `parseBinaryExpr()`, after `p.nextToken()` and before `p.parseExpression(prec)`, skip NEWLINE and INDENT tokens. Track how many INDENTs were skipped. After parsing the RHS, consume matching NEWLINE+DEDENT pairs:\n\n```go\nfunc (p *Parser) parseBinaryExpr(left ast.Expression) ast.Expression {\n    expr := &ast.BinaryExpr{...}\n    prec := p.curPrecedence()\n    p.nextToken()\n    \n    // Handle multi-line expression continuation\n    contIndent := 0\n    for p.curTokenIs(lexer.NEWLINE) || p.curTokenIs(lexer.INDENT) {\n        if p.curTokenIs(lexer.INDENT) {\n            contIndent++\n        }\n        p.nextToken()\n    }\n    \n    expr.Right = p.parseExpression(prec)\n    \n    // Consume matching continuation DEDENTs\n    for contIndent > 0 {\n        if p.peekTokenIs(lexer.NEWLINE) {\n            p.nextToken()\n        }\n        if p.peekTokenIs(lexer.DEDENT) {\n            p.nextToken()\n            contIndent--\n        } else {\n            break\n        }\n    }\n    \n    return expr\n}\n```\n\nThis works because: (a) single-line expressions don't trigger the loops, (b) the INDENT/DEDENT pair is consumed within parseBinaryExpr maintaining balance, (c) nested multi-line expressions work because each parseBinaryExpr call handles its own level.\n\n### 5. Transputer Intrinsics (57 calls total)\nLONGPROD, LONGDIV, LONGSUM, LONGDIFF, NORMALISE, SHIFTRIGHT, SHIFTLEFT — all used in multi-assignment: `a, b := LONGPROD(x, y, z)`.\n\n**Parser**: NO changes needed! These are identifiers followed by `(`, which already parses as function calls. Multi-assignment `a, b := FUNC(...)` already works via `parseMultiAssignment()`.\n\n**Codegen**: In `generateMultiAssignment()` and `generateFuncCallExpr()`, check if the function name is an intrinsic. If so, prefix with `_` (e.g., `_LONGPROD`).\n\n**Helper functions**: Emit Go helper functions when intrinsics are used. Add a `containsIntrinsics()` scanner (like existing `containsPar()`, `containsMostExpr()`). The helpers:\n\n```go\nfunc _LONGPROD(a, b, c int) (int, int) {\n    r := uint64(uint32(a))*uint64(uint32(b)) + uint64(uint32(c))\n    return int(uint32(r >> 32)), int(uint32(r))\n}\nfunc _LONGDIV(hi, lo, d int) (int, int) {\n    n := (uint64(uint32(hi)) << 32) | uint64(uint32(lo))\n    return int(uint32(n / uint64(uint32(d)))), int(uint32(n % uint64(uint32(d))))\n}\nfunc _LONGSUM(a, b, c int) (int, int) {\n    r := uint64(uint32(a)) + uint64(uint32(b)) + uint64(uint32(c))\n    return int(uint32(r >> 32)), int(uint32(r))\n}\nfunc _LONGDIFF(a, b, c int) (int, int) {\n    r := int64(uint32(a)) - int64(uint32(b)) - int64(uint32(c))\n    borrow := 0; if r < 0 { borrow = 1 }\n    return borrow, int(uint32(r))\n}\nfunc _NORMALISE(hi, lo int) (int, int, int) {\n    v := (uint64(uint32(hi)) << 32) | uint64(uint32(lo))\n    if v == 0 { return 64, 0, 0 }\n    p := bits.LeadingZeros64(v); v <<= uint(p)\n    return p, int(uint32(v >> 32)), int(uint32(v))\n}\nfunc _SHIFTRIGHT(hi, lo, n int) (int, int) {\n    v := (uint64(uint32(hi)) << 32) | uint64(uint32(lo))\n    v >>= uint(uint32(n))\n    return int(uint32(v >> 32)), int(uint32(v))\n}\nfunc _SHIFTLEFT(hi, lo, n int) (int, int) {\n    v := (uint64(uint32(hi)) << 32) | uint64(uint32(lo))\n    v <<= uint(uint32(n))\n    return int(uint32(v >> 32)), int(uint32(v))\n}\n```\n\nNeeds `math/bits` import.\n\n### 6. CAUSEERROR() (2 occurrences, both in #ELSE branches)\nWith `-D TARGET.BITS.PER.WORD=32`, CAUSEERROR is preprocessed out. But implement for completeness.\n\n**Parser**: Recognizes `CAUSEERROR` as a proc call (IDENT followed by `(`). No special parsing needed.\n\n**Codegen**: When generating a proc call with name `CAUSEERROR`, emit `panic(\"CAUSEERROR\")`.\n\n## Key Files to Modify\n\n1. `lexer/token.go` — Add RETYPES token; add to keywords map\n2. `lexer/lexer.go` — Track `[`/`]` in parenDepth for NEWLINE suppression\n3. `ast/ast.go` — Add ArrayLiteral and RetypesDecl nodes\n4. `parser/parser.go` — Untyped VAL, array literals, RETYPES, multi-line expressions\n5. `codegen/codegen.go` — Array literal codegen, RETYPES codegen, intrinsic helpers, CAUSEERROR, untyped VAL package-level\n\n## Implementation Order (by dependency)\n\n1. Lexer: RETYPES keyword + bracket NEWLINE suppression\n2. AST: ArrayLiteral + RetypesDecl nodes\n3. Parser: Untyped VAL abbreviations (biggest error reduction)\n4. Parser: Array literal expressions\n5. Parser: RETYPES declarations\n6. Parser: Multi-line expression continuation\n7. Codegen: Untyped VAL, array literals\n8. Codegen: RETYPES (with math import)\n9. Codegen: Transputer intrinsic helpers + recognition\n10. Codegen: CAUSEERROR\n11. Tests for each feature\n12. Full course module verification\n\n## Verification\n\n```bash\n# Build\ngo build -o occam2go .\n\n# Transpile full course module\n./occam2go -I kroc/modules/course/libsrc -D TARGET.BITS.PER.WORD=32 -o /tmp/course_out.go kroc/modules/course/libsrc/course.module\n\n# Verify Go output compiles\ngo vet /tmp/course_out.go\n\n# Run all tests\ngo test ./...\n```\n\nPlease produce a detailed implementation plan that I can write to the plan file."
}
[
  {
    "type": "text",
    "text": "Here is the detailed implementation plan for Phase 2.\n\n---\n\n## Phase 2 Implementation Plan: Full Course Module Transpilation (Including float_io.occ)\n\n### Problem Statement\n\nThe transpiler currently produces 598 parse errors when processing the full `course.module` (which includes `float_io.occ`). All 598 errors trace back to 4 root causes, each a missing language feature. Fixing these 4 features will eliminate all errors.\n\n### Error Root Cause Analysis (598 total errors)\n\n| Root Cause | Direct Errors | Cascading Errors | Total |\n|---|---|---|---|\n| Untyped VAL abbreviations | 41 | ~130 | ~171 |\n| Array literal expressions | 10 | ~330 | ~340 |\n| Multi-line expression continuation | 10 | ~70 | ~80 |\n| RETYPES declarations | 2 | ~5 | ~7 |\n| **Total** | **63** | **~535** | **598** |\n\nAfter parse errors are resolved, codegen needs 3 additional features: transputer intrinsic helper functions, RETYPES code generation, and CAUSEERROR mapping.\n\n---\n\n### Feature 1: Untyped VAL Abbreviations\n\n**Occam syntax**: `VAL SignBit IS #80000000 :` (no explicit type keyword between VAL and the name)\n\n**Occurrences**: 41 direct errors on unique lines (biggest error contributor)\n\n**Files to modify**:\n\n#### 1a. Parser: `/home/david/projects/code-associates/occam2go/parser/parser.go`\n\nIn `parseAbbreviation()` (line 318), after `p.nextToken()` past VAL (line 321) and after the open-array `[]` check (lines 323-329), the code currently checks `isTypeToken(p.curToken.Type)` at line 332. When the current token is an IDENT (not a type keyword), it fails.\n\n**Change**: After the `[]` check, if `curToken` is IDENT (not a type token), check if `peekToken` is IS. If so, this is an untyped abbreviation. Parse as: `VAL <name:IDENT> IS <expr> :` with `Type = \"\"`.\n\n```go\n// After the isOpenArray check (line 329), insert:\nif p.curTokenIs(lexer.IDENT) && p.peekTokenIs(lexer.IS) {\n    // Untyped VAL abbreviation: VAL name IS expr :\n    name := p.curToken.Literal\n    p.nextToken() // consume IS\n    p.nextToken() // move past IS to expression\n    value := p.parseExpression(LOWEST)\n    if !p.expectPeek(lexer.COLON) {\n        return nil\n    }\n    return &ast.Abbreviation{\n        Token:  token,\n        IsVal:  true,\n        Type:   \"\",   // No explicit type\n        Name:   name,\n        Value:  value,\n    }\n}\n```\n\nThis must be inserted BEFORE the existing `isTypeToken` check at line 332.\n\n#### 1b. Codegen: `/home/david/projects/code-associates/occam2go/codegen/codegen.go`\n\n**Local abbreviations** (inside functions): `generateAbbreviation()` at line 776 uses `:=` which relies on Go type inference. Empty Type works here with no changes needed.\n\n**Package-level abbreviations** (lines 179-190): Currently generates `var name type = expr`. When Type is empty, this produces `var name  = expr` (double space, and Go compiler may complain about missing type for some expressions). Fix:\n\n```go\n// In the package-level abbreviation loop (line 180-189):\nif abbr.Type == \"\" {\n    g.builder.WriteString(\"var \")\n    g.write(fmt.Sprintf(\"%s = \", goIdent(abbr.Name)))\n} else {\n    goType := g.occamTypeToGo(abbr.Type)\n    if abbr.IsOpenArray {\n        goType = \"[]\" + goType\n    }\n    g.builder.WriteString(\"var \")\n    g.write(fmt.Sprintf(\"%s %s = \", goIdent(abbr.Name), goType))\n}\n```\n\n**Testing**: Parser test with `VAL x IS 42 :` and `VAL mask IS #FF :`. E2E test using an untyped VAL in a PROC body.\n\n---\n\n### Feature 2: Array Literal Expressions\n\n**Occam syntax**: `VAL PowerTenExp IS [0, 3, 6, 9, 13, 16, 19, 23, 26, 29, 33, 36, 39, 43] :` -- multi-line array literal spanning up to 10 lines.\n\n**Occurrences**: 10 `expected ], got ,` errors + ~330 cascading errors from multi-line array content.\n\n#### 2a. Lexer: `/home/david/projects/code-associates/occam2go/lexer/lexer.go`\n\nAdd `[`/`]` tracking to `parenDepth` so that NEWLINEs inside `[...]` are suppressed. This matches Python's behavior where `()`, `[]`, and `{}` all suppress implicit newlines.\n\nAt line 103-104, the `[` case currently only emits LBRACKET. Add `l.parenDepth++`:\n```go\ncase '[':\n    l.parenDepth++\n    tok = l.newToken(LBRACKET, l.ch)\n```\n\nAt line 105-106, the `]` case currently only emits RBRACKET. Add depth decrement:\n```go\ncase ']':\n    if l.parenDepth > 0 {\n        l.parenDepth--\n    }\n    tok = l.newToken(RBRACKET, l.ch)\n```\n\nThis is safe because:\n- Array indexing `arr[i]` opens and closes `[]` within a single expression, so depth returns to previous level.\n- Slice expressions `[arr FROM n FOR m]` similarly balance within an expression.\n- Array literals `[e1, e2, ...]` balance the brackets.\n- The INDENT/DEDENT suppression at line 68-70 and NEWLINE suppression at line 220-222 use the existing `parenDepth > 0` check, which now covers `[...]` too.\n\n**Caution**: The lexer's indent stack (`indentStack`) is NOT modified when `parenDepth > 0` (line 68-70). This means that after a multi-line array literal, the indent stack reflects the level before the literal, which is correct. When the `]` closes and parenDepth returns to 0, subsequent lines will be processed normally against the unchanged indent stack.\n\n#### 2b. AST: `/home/david/projects/code-associates/occam2go/ast/ast.go`\n\nAdd new `ArrayLiteral` expression node:\n\n```go\n// ArrayLiteral represents an array literal: [e1, e2, e3, ...]\ntype ArrayLiteral struct {\n    Token    lexer.Token  // the [ token\n    Elements []Expression // the elements\n}\n\nfunc (al *ArrayLiteral) expressionNode()      {}\nfunc (al *ArrayLiteral) TokenLiteral() string { return al.Token.Literal }\n```\n\n#### 2c. Parser: `/home/david/projects/code-associates/occam2go/parser/parser.go`\n\nIn `parseExpression()`, the `case lexer.LBRACKET:` (line 2591) currently assumes a slice expression. Need to detect array literals by checking: after parsing the first element, if followed by COMMA, it is an array literal. If followed by FROM or FOR, it is a slice expression.\n\nReplace the LBRACKET case (lines 2591-2620) with:\n\n```go\ncase lexer.LBRACKET:\n    lbracket := p.curToken\n    p.nextToken() // move past [\n    firstExpr := p.parseExpression(LOWEST)\n    \n    if p.peekTokenIs(lexer.COMMA) {\n        // Array literal: [expr, expr, ...]\n        elements := []ast.Expression{firstExpr}\n        for p.peekTokenIs(lexer.COMMA) {\n            p.nextToken() // consume comma\n            p.nextToken() // move to next element\n            elements = append(elements, p.parseExpression(LOWEST))\n        }\n        if !p.expectPeek(lexer.RBRACKET) {\n            return nil\n        }\n        left = &ast.ArrayLiteral{Token: lbracket, Elements: elements}\n    } else if p.peekTokenIs(lexer.FOR) {\n        // Slice shorthand: [arr FOR length]\n        startExpr := &ast.IntegerLiteral{Token: lexer.Token{Type: lexer.INT, Literal: \"0\"}, Value: 0}\n        if !p.expectPeek(lexer.FOR) { return nil }\n        p.nextToken()\n        lengthExpr := p.parseExpression(LOWEST)\n        if !p.expectPeek(lexer.RBRACKET) { return nil }\n        left = &ast.SliceExpr{Token: lbracket, Array: firstExpr, Start: startExpr, Length: lengthExpr}\n    } else if p.peekTokenIs(lexer.FROM) {\n        // Slice: [arr FROM start FOR length]\n        if !p.expectPeek(lexer.FROM) { return nil }\n        p.nextToken()\n        startExpr := p.parseExpression(LOWEST)\n        if !p.expectPeek(lexer.FOR) { return nil }\n        p.nextToken()\n        lengthExpr := p.parseExpression(LOWEST)\n        if !p.expectPeek(lexer.RBRACKET) { return nil }\n        left = &ast.SliceExpr{Token: lbracket, Array: firstExpr, Start: startExpr, Length: lengthExpr}\n    } else if p.peekTokenIs(lexer.RBRACKET) {\n        // Single-element array literal: [expr]\n        p.nextToken() // consume ]\n        left = &ast.ArrayLiteral{Token: lbracket, Elements: []ast.Expression{firstExpr}}\n    } else {\n        p.addError(fmt.Sprintf(\"expected ], FROM, FOR, or , after expression in [...], got %s\", p.peekToken.Type))\n        return nil\n    }\n```\n\n#### 2d. Codegen: `/home/david/projects/code-associates/occam2go/codegen/codegen.go`\n\nAdd `ArrayLiteral` case to `generateExpression()` (line 1880):\n\n```go\ncase *ast.ArrayLiteral:\n    g.write(\"[]int{\")\n    for i, elem := range e.Elements {\n        if i > 0 {\n            g.write(\", \")\n        }\n        g.generateExpression(elem)\n    }\n    g.write(\"}\")\n```\n\nNote: Using `[]int{...}` as the default type. Since all array literals in float_io.occ contain hex integer constants (all INT type), this is correct. For a more general solution, the type could be inferred from the context (e.g., the Abbreviation's type), but for Phase 2, `[]int` suffices.\n\nAlso add the `ArrayLiteral` case to all the `containsX` scanner functions so they recurse into array literal elements.\n\n**Testing**: Parser test for `[1, 2, 3]`, multi-line `[#FF, #80,\\n#90]`. E2E test indexing into an array literal abbreviation.\n\n---\n\n### Feature 3: Multi-line Expression Continuation\n\n**Occam pattern**: A binary operator (AND, OR, etc.) at the end of a line, with the right-hand operand on the following (more-indented) line:\n```\nround.up := ( direction = exact ) AND\n             ( ( Buf[digits - 1] = '1' ) OR ...\n```\n\n**Occurrences**: 10 `unexpected token in expression: NEWLINE` errors + ~70 cascading errors.\n\n**Key insight**: After the binary operator (AND/OR), the lexer emits NEWLINE followed by INDENT (the continuation line is indented deeper). The expression parser stops at NEWLINE, failing to parse the RHS. Once the continuation starts with `(`, subsequent inner NEWLINEs are suppressed by the lexer's paren depth tracking. So only the FIRST NEWLINE+INDENT after the operator needs handling.\n\n#### 3a. Parser: `/home/david/projects/code-associates/occam2go/parser/parser.go`\n\nModify `parseBinaryExpr()` (line 2680) to handle multi-line continuation:\n\n```go\nfunc (p *Parser) parseBinaryExpr(left ast.Expression) ast.Expression {\n    expr := &ast.BinaryExpr{\n        Token:    p.curToken,\n        Left:     left,\n        Operator: p.curToken.Literal,\n    }\n\n    prec := p.curPrecedence()\n    p.nextToken()\n\n    // Handle multi-line expression continuation:\n    // After a binary operator, skip NEWLINE and INDENT tokens to allow\n    // the RHS expression to continue on the next line.\n    extraIndents := 0\n    for p.curTokenIs(lexer.NEWLINE) || p.curTokenIs(lexer.INDENT) {\n        if p.curTokenIs(lexer.INDENT) {\n            extraIndents++\n        }\n        p.nextToken()\n    }\n\n    expr.Right = p.parseExpression(prec)\n\n    // Consume matching continuation DEDENTs to restore indent balance.\n    // After the RHS expression, the DEDENT(s) from the continuation\n    // indentation appear before the next statement's tokens.\n    for extraIndents > 0 {\n        if p.peekTokenIs(lexer.NEWLINE) {\n            p.nextToken() // skip NEWLINE before DEDENT\n        }\n        if p.peekTokenIs(lexer.DEDENT) {\n            p.nextToken() // consume DEDENT\n            extraIndents--\n        } else {\n            break\n        }\n    }\n\n    return expr\n}\n```\n\n**Why this works**:\n1. Single-line expressions: The `for` loops don't execute (curToken is not NEWLINE/INDENT after the operator).\n2. Multi-line with one continuation level: Skips one NEWLINE+INDENT (extraIndents=1). After parsing RHS, consumes matching NEWLINE+DEDENT.\n3. Nested multi-line (e.g., AND at end of line, then OR inside parens): The AND continuation is handled here. The OR lines inside `(...)` are handled by the lexer's paren depth NEWLINE suppression. No parser changes needed for the inner levels.\n4. Indent balance: The consumed INDENT increments `p.indentLevel` (via `nextToken()`). The consumed DEDENT decrements it. Net effect is zero, maintaining balance for the calling block parser.\n\n**Testing**: Parser test with multi-line `x AND\\n  y`. E2E test with multi-line IF guard using AND/OR continuation.\n\n---\n\n### Feature 4: RETYPES Declarations\n\n**Occam syntax**:\n```\nVAL INT X RETYPES X :           -- REAL32 -> INT (bit reinterpretation)\nVAL [2]INT X RETYPES X :       -- REAL64 -> [2]INT (bit reinterpretation)\n```\n\n**Occurrences**: 2 (lines 139 and 1105 of float_io.occ)\n\n#### 4a. Lexer: `/home/david/projects/code-associates/occam2go/lexer/token.go`\n\nAdd RETYPES keyword token. Insert in the keyword constants:\n```go\nRETYPES  // RETYPES keyword\n```\n\nAdd to `tokenNames` map:\n```go\nRETYPES: \"RETYPES\",\n```\n\nAdd to `keywords` map:\n```go\n\"RETYPES\": RETYPES,\n```\n\nPlace the RETYPES constant between INITIAL and PLUS_KW (or at the end of the keyword block before `keyword_end`).\n\n#### 4b. AST: `/home/david/projects/code-associates/occam2go/ast/ast.go`\n\nAdd new `RetypesDecl` statement node:\n\n```go\n// RetypesDecl represents a RETYPES declaration: VAL INT X RETYPES X :\n// or VAL [2]INT X RETYPES X :\ntype RetypesDecl struct {\n    Token      lexer.Token // VAL token\n    IsVal      bool        // always true (only VAL RETYPES in float_io.occ)\n    TargetType string      // \"INT\", \"BYTE\", etc.\n    IsArray    bool        // true for [n]TYPE RETYPES\n    ArraySize  int         // array size when IsArray (e.g., 2)\n    Name       string      // target variable name\n    Source     string      // source variable name\n}\n\nfunc (r *RetypesDecl) statementNode()       {}\nfunc (r *RetypesDecl) TokenLiteral() string { return r.Token.Literal }\n```\n\n#### 4c. Parser: `/home/david/projects/code-associates/occam2go/parser/parser.go`\n\nIn `parseAbbreviation()`, after parsing `VAL <type> <name>` (lines 336-342), instead of immediately expecting IS (line 345), check if `peekToken` is RETYPES:\n\n```go\n// After parsing type and name (line 342):\nname := p.curToken.Literal\n\n// Check for RETYPES\nif p.peekTokenIs(lexer.RETYPES) {\n    p.nextToken() // consume RETYPES\n    p.nextToken() // move to source name\n    if !p.curTokenIs(lexer.IDENT) {\n        p.addError(fmt.Sprintf(\"expected identifier after RETYPES, got %s\", p.curToken.Type))\n        return nil\n    }\n    source := p.curToken.Literal\n    if !p.expectPeek(lexer.COLON) {\n        return nil\n    }\n    return &ast.RetypesDecl{\n        Token:      token,\n        IsVal:      true,\n        TargetType: typeName,\n        Name:       name,\n        Source:     source,\n    }\n}\n\n// Expect IS (existing code at line 345)\n```\n\nAlso handle the `VAL [n]TYPE name RETYPES source :` case. In `parseAbbreviation()`, after the open-array check (line 325-329), add a fixed-size array check:\n\n```go\n// After isOpenArray check and before isTypeToken check:\nisFixedArray := false\narraySize := 0\nif p.curTokenIs(lexer.LBRACKET) && !p.peekTokenIs(lexer.RBRACKET) {\n    // Could be [n]TYPE for RETYPES\n    p.nextToken() // move past [\n    if p.curTokenIs(lexer.INT) {\n        size, _ := strconv.Atoi(p.curToken.Literal)\n        arraySize = size\n        if !p.expectPeek(lexer.RBRACKET) { return nil }\n        p.nextToken() // move to type\n        isFixedArray = true\n    }\n}\n```\n\nThen the existing type/name/RETYPES parsing continues. When creating the RetypesDecl, set `IsArray = isFixedArray` and `ArraySize = arraySize`.\n\n#### 4d. Codegen: `/home/david/projects/code-associates/occam2go/codegen/codegen.go`\n\nAdd `RetypesDecl` case to `generateStatement()`:\n\n```go\ncase *ast.RetypesDecl:\n    g.generateRetypesDecl(s)\n```\n\nImplement `generateRetypesDecl`:\n\n```go\nfunc (g *Generator) generateRetypesDecl(r *ast.RetypesDecl) {\n    g.builder.WriteString(strings.Repeat(\"\\t\", g.indent))\n    src := goIdent(r.Source)\n    dst := goIdent(r.Name)\n    \n    if r.IsArray && r.TargetType == \"INT\" {\n        // VAL [2]INT X RETYPES X : (REAL64 -> [2]INT)\n        // _bits := math.Float64bits(X)\n        // X := [2]int{int(uint32(_bits)), int(uint32(_bits >> 32))}\n        tmpName := fmt.Sprintf(\"_bits_%d\", g.tmpCounter)\n        g.tmpCounter++\n        g.write(fmt.Sprintf(\"%s := math.Float64bits(float64(%s))\\n\", tmpName, src))\n        g.builder.WriteString(strings.Repeat(\"\\t\", g.indent))\n        g.write(fmt.Sprintf(\"%s := [%d]int{int(uint32(%s)), int(uint32(%s >> 32))}\\n\",\n            dst, r.ArraySize, tmpName, tmpName))\n    } else if r.TargetType == \"INT\" {\n        // VAL INT X RETYPES X : (REAL32 -> INT)\n        // X := int(math.Float32bits(float32(X)))\n        g.write(fmt.Sprintf(\"%s := int(math.Float32bits(float32(%s)))\\n\", dst, src))\n    } else {\n        // Fallback for other RETYPES (not used in float_io.occ)\n        g.write(fmt.Sprintf(\"// TODO: RETYPES %s %s = %s\\n\", r.TargetType, dst, src))\n    }\n    g.needMath = true\n}\n```\n\nAlso add `RetypesDecl` to all `containsX` scanner functions so `needMath` is set correctly:\n- `containsMostExpr` (or add a new `containsRetypes` scanner): Return true when a RetypesDecl is found, triggering `g.needMath = true`.\n\nActually, better approach: set `g.needMath = true` directly in the first pass (line 73-106 of Generate()), by adding:\n```go\nif _, ok := stmt.(*ast.RetypesDecl); ok {\n    g.needMath = true\n}\n```\n\nAnd recursively check inside ProcDecl/FuncDecl bodies.\n\n**Testing**: Parser test for `VAL INT X RETYPES X :` and `VAL [2]INT X RETYPES X :`. Codegen test checking generated Go output contains `math.Float32bits`.\n\n---\n\n### Feature 5: Transputer Intrinsic Helper Functions\n\n**Intrinsics**: LONGPROD, LONGDIV, LONGSUM, LONGDIFF, NORMALISE, SHIFTRIGHT, SHIFTLEFT\n\n**Occurrences**: 84 calls total across float_io.occ. Used exclusively in multi-assignment context: `a, b := INTRINSIC(x, y, z)`.\n\n**No parser changes needed**: Intrinsics are syntactically identical to function calls (IDENT followed by LPAREN). The multi-assignment parser already handles them.\n\n#### 5a. Codegen: `/home/david/projects/code-associates/occam2go/codegen/codegen.go`\n\n**Intrinsic recognition**: Add a set of known intrinsic names:\n\n```go\nvar transpIntrinsics = map[string]bool{\n    \"LONGPROD\":   true,\n    \"LONGDIV\":    true,\n    \"LONGSUM\":    true,\n    \"LONGDIFF\":   true,\n    \"NORMALISE\":  true,\n    \"SHIFTRIGHT\": true,\n    \"SHIFTLEFT\":  true,\n}\n```\n\n**Function name prefixing**: In `generateFuncCallExpr()` (line 1581), check if the function name is an intrinsic. If so, prefix with `_`:\n\n```go\nfunc (g *Generator) generateFuncCallExpr(call *ast.FuncCall) {\n    name := goIdent(call.Name)\n    if transpIntrinsics[call.Name] {\n        name = \"_\" + call.Name\n    }\n    g.write(name)\n    g.write(\"(\")\n    // ... rest unchanged\n```\n\n**Helper function emission**: Add a `needMathBits` bool to the Generator struct. Add a `containsIntrinsics()` scanner (following the pattern of `containsPar()`, `containsMostExpr()`) that traverses the AST looking for FuncCall nodes with intrinsic names.\n\nIn the first pass of `Generate()` (lines 73-106), add:\n```go\nif g.containsIntrinsics(stmt) {\n    g.needMathBits = true\n}\n```\n\nAdd `\"math/bits\"` to the import block when `needMathBits` is true (line 112-134).\n\nEmit the helper functions after the import block and before type/proc declarations. The helpers should be emitted only when `needMathBits` is true:\n\n```go\nif g.needMathBits {\n    g.emitIntrinsicHelpers()\n}\n```\n\n**Helper function implementations** (all use `uint64` and `uint32` arithmetic to match transputer 32-bit word semantics):\n\n```go\nfunc (g *Generator) emitIntrinsicHelpers() {\n    helpers := `\nfunc _LONGPROD(a, b, c int) (int, int) {\n    r := uint64(uint32(a))*uint64(uint32(b)) + uint64(uint32(c))\n    return int(uint32(r >> 32)), int(uint32(r))\n}\n\nfunc _LONGDIV(hi, lo, d int) (int, int) {\n    n := (uint64(uint32(hi)) << 32) | uint64(uint32(lo))\n    return int(uint32(n / uint64(uint32(d)))), int(uint32(n % uint64(uint32(d))))\n}\n\nfunc _LONGSUM(a, b, c int) (int, int) {\n    r := uint64(uint32(a)) + uint64(uint32(b)) + uint64(uint32(c))\n    return int(uint32(r >> 32)), int(uint32(r))\n}\n\nfunc _LONGDIFF(a, b, c int) (int, int) {\n    r := int64(uint32(a)) - int64(uint32(b)) - int64(uint32(c))\n    borrow := 0\n    if r < 0 {\n        borrow = 1\n    }\n    return borrow, int(uint32(r))\n}\n\nfunc _NORMALISE(hi, lo int) (int, int, int) {\n    v := (uint64(uint32(hi)) << 32) | uint64(uint32(lo))\n    if v == 0 {\n        return 64, 0, 0\n    }\n    p := bits.LeadingZeros64(v)\n    v <<= uint(p)\n    return p, int(uint32(v >> 32)), int(uint32(v))\n}\n\nfunc _SHIFTRIGHT(hi, lo, n int) (int, int) {\n    v := (uint64(uint32(hi)) << 32) | uint64(uint32(lo))\n    v >>= uint(uint32(n))\n    return int(uint32(v >> 32)), int(uint32(v))\n}\n\nfunc _SHIFTLEFT(hi, lo, n int) (int, int) {\n    v := (uint64(uint32(hi)) << 32) | uint64(uint32(lo))\n    v <<= uint(uint32(n))\n    return int(uint32(v >> 32)), int(uint32(v))\n}\n`\n    g.builder.WriteString(helpers)\n}\n```\n\n**Testing**: E2E test calling each intrinsic with known values and checking results. For example:\n- `LONGPROD(3, 4, 5)` should return `(0, 17)` (3*4+5=17, fits in low word).\n- `NORMALISE(0, 1)` should return `(63, int(1<<31), 0)` (leading zeros of 1 in 64-bit = 63, shifted left by 63).\n\n---\n\n### Feature 6: CAUSEERROR\n\n**Occam syntax**: `CAUSEERROR ()` -- error-raising primitive.\n\n**Occurrences**: 2 in float_io.occ (lines 988 and 2187), both inside `#ELSE` branches. With `-D TARGET.BITS.PER.WORD=32`, these are preprocessed out. But implement for completeness.\n\n**No parser changes needed**: `CAUSEERROR ()` parses as a proc call (IDENT followed by LPAREN RPAREN).\n\n#### 6a. Codegen: `/home/david/projects/code-associates/occam2go/codegen/codegen.go`\n\nIn `generateProcCall()` (line 1498), add a check:\n\n```go\nfunc (g *Generator) generateProcCall(call *ast.ProcCall) {\n    // Check for CAUSEERROR\n    if call.Name == \"CAUSEERROR\" {\n        g.writeLine(`panic(\"CAUSEERROR\")`)\n        return\n    }\n    // ... rest of existing code\n```\n\n**Testing**: E2E test is not practical (CAUSEERROR panics). Codegen unit test checking the output contains `panic(\"CAUSEERROR\")`.\n\n---\n\n### Implementation Order\n\nThe features should be implemented in this specific order based on error reduction impact and dependencies:\n\n**Step 1: Lexer bracket NEWLINE suppression** (Feature 2a)\n- 2 lines changed in `lexer/lexer.go`\n- Enables array literals to lex correctly across lines\n- Quick win, unblocks Feature 2\n\n**Step 2: RETYPES keyword token** (Feature 4a)\n- 3 additions to `lexer/token.go`\n- Unblocks RETYPES parsing\n\n**Step 3: AST nodes** (Features 2b, 4b)\n- Add `ArrayLiteral` and `RetypesDecl` to `ast/ast.go`\n- Unblocks parser changes\n\n**Step 4: Untyped VAL abbreviations** (Feature 1a)\n- Parser change in `parseAbbreviation()` \n- Fixes 41 direct + ~130 cascading errors (biggest impact)\n\n**Step 5: Array literal expressions** (Feature 2c)\n- Parser change in `parseExpression()` LBRACKET case\n- Fixes 10 direct + ~330 cascading errors\n\n**Step 6: RETYPES declarations** (Feature 4c)\n- Parser change in `parseAbbreviation()`\n- Fixes 2 direct + ~5 cascading errors\n\n**Step 7: Multi-line expression continuation** (Feature 3a)\n- Parser change in `parseBinaryExpr()`\n- Fixes 10 direct + ~70 cascading errors\n- **After this step: 0 parse errors on full course module**\n\n**Step 8: Codegen - untyped VAL + array literals** (Features 1b, 2d)\n- Codegen changes for empty-type abbreviations and ArrayLiteral\n\n**Step 9: Codegen - RETYPES** (Feature 4d)\n- RETYPES code generation with `math.Float32bits` / `math.Float64bits`\n\n**Step 10: Codegen - intrinsic helpers** (Feature 5)\n- Intrinsic recognition + helper function emission\n- Most complex codegen change\n\n**Step 11: Codegen - CAUSEERROR** (Feature 6a)\n- Trivial codegen addition\n\n**Step 12: Integration tests**\n- Parser unit tests for each new feature\n- Codegen unit tests for each new feature\n- E2E tests for: untyped VAL, array literals, multi-line expressions, intrinsics\n- Full course module verification: transpile + `go vet`\n\n### Testing Strategy\n\n#### Unit Tests\n\nAdd to `parser/parser_test.go`:\n- `TestParseUntypedValAbbreviation` - `VAL x IS 42 :`\n- `TestParseUntypedValHex` - `VAL mask IS #FF :`\n- `TestParseArrayLiteral` - `[1, 2, 3]` in expression context\n- `TestParseArrayLiteralSingleElement` - `[42]` (must not confuse with array decl)\n- `TestParseRetypesInt` - `VAL INT X RETYPES X :`\n- `TestParseRetypesArrayInt` - `VAL [2]INT X RETYPES X :`\n- `TestParseMultiLineExpression` - multi-line AND/OR continuation\n\nAdd to `codegen/codegen_test.go`:\n- `TestGenUntypedValAbbreviation` - verifies `:=` output\n- `TestGenArrayLiteral` - verifies `[]int{...}` output\n- `TestGenRetypesReal32` - verifies `math.Float32bits` output\n- `TestGenRetypesReal64` - verifies `math.Float64bits` output\n- `TestGenIntrinsicLongprod` - verifies `_LONGPROD` call\n- `TestGenCauseerror` - verifies `panic(\"CAUSEERROR\")` output\n\n#### E2E Tests\n\nAdd to `codegen/e2e_types_test.go` or a new `codegen/e2e_float_io_test.go`:\n- `TestE2E_UntypedVal` - untyped VAL used in computation\n- `TestE2E_ArrayLiteral` - array literal indexed and printed\n- `TestE2E_MultiLineExpr` - multi-line AND/OR expression evaluated\n- `TestE2E_LongProd` - call _LONGPROD with known values\n- `TestE2E_LongDiv` - call _LONGDIV with known values\n- `TestE2E_Normalise` - call _NORMALISE with known values\n- `TestE2E_ShiftLeftRight` - call _SHIFTLEFT/_SHIFTRIGHT with known values\n\n#### Integration Verification\n\n```bash\n# Build\ngo build -o occam2go .\n\n# Transpile full course module\n./occam2go -I kroc/modules/course/libsrc -D TARGET.BITS.PER.WORD=32 \\\n    -o /tmp/course_out.go kroc/modules/course/libsrc/course.module\n\n# Verify Go output compiles (expect only \"no main function\" since it's a library)\ngo vet /tmp/course_out.go\n\n# Run all tests\ngo test ./...\n```\n\n---\n\n### Risks and Mitigation\n\n1. **Multi-line expression DEDENT tracking**: The `parseBinaryExpr` DEDENT consumption assumes the continuation DEDENT is the first DEDENT after the RHS expression. If the RHS expression itself contains block constructs that produce DEDENTs, this could consume the wrong DEDENT. **Mitigation**: In float_io.occ, all multi-line expression continuations have simple parenthesized RHS expressions (no block constructs). Test thoroughly with the actual file. If needed, a more robust approach would save and check `indentLevel` before/after.\n\n2. **Array literal type inference**: Using `[]int{}` for all array literals. If any array literal contains non-integer values, this would fail. **Mitigation**: All array literals in float_io.occ contain hex integers (INT type). For future generality, could infer type from the abbreviation context.\n\n3. **RETYPES naming collision**: When `VAL INT X RETYPES X :` creates a new X shadowing the parameter X, Go's `:=` creates a new scope variable. Subsequent code using X sees the INT version. **Mitigation**: This is correct Go shadowing behavior. Go allows `x := int(...)` even when x is already declared as float32 in the parameter list.\n\n4. **Intrinsic 32-bit arithmetic**: The helper functions use `uint32` casts to match transputer 32-bit word semantics. This differs from Go's native 64-bit int. **Mitigation**: The float_io.occ code was written for 32-bit transputers. The `uint32` truncation in helpers ensures identical behavior. Test with known values from the transputer documentation.\n\n5. **`needMathBits` import**: Adding `\"math/bits\"` import requires it to be used. If the intrinsic helpers are emitted but no intrinsic is actually called (e.g., preprocessor excluded them), the unused import causes a Go compile error. **Mitigation**: Only emit helpers when `containsIntrinsics()` returns true for actual FuncCall nodes in the AST.\n\n---\n\n### Critical Files for Implementation\n\n- `/home/david/projects/code-associates/occam2go/parser/parser.go` - Main parser: untyped VAL, array literals, RETYPES, multi-line continuation (4 of 6 features)\n- `/home/david/projects/code-associates/occam2go/codegen/codegen.go` - Code generator: array literal gen, RETYPES gen, intrinsic helpers, CAUSEERROR, untyped VAL package-level\n- `/home/david/projects/code-associates/occam2go/ast/ast.go` - AST node definitions: ArrayLiteral, RetypesDecl\n- `/home/david/projects/code-associates/occam2go/lexer/lexer.go` - Bracket NEWLINE suppression (2 lines)\n- `/home/david/projects/code-associates/occam2go/lexer/token.go` - RETYPES keyword token"
  },
  {
    "type": "text",
    "text": "agentId: a0f898a (for resuming to continue this agent's work if needed)\n<usage>total_tokens: 129654\ntool_uses: 92\nduration_ms: 2778036</usage>"
  }
]

Now let me write the final plan file and present it for approval.

📝 Write curious-honking-whisper.md
/home/david/.claude/plans/curious-honking-whisper.md
# Phase 2: Full Course Module Transpilation (float_io.occ)

## Context

The transpiler cleanly processes `course_nofloat.module` but produces 598 parse errors on the full `course.module` because `float_io.occ` uses 6 unimplemented constructs. All 598 errors trace to 4 parse-level root causes plus 2 codegen-only features.

## Implementation Plan

### Step 1: Lexer — bracket NEWLINE suppression + RETYPES keyword

**`lexer/lexer.go`**: Add `[`/`]` tracking to `parenDepth` so NEWLINEs inside `[...]` are suppressed (needed for multi-line array literals like `VAL PowerTenFrac IS [#80000000, #A0000000, ...] :`). Just add `l.parenDepth++` on `[` and `l.parenDepth--` on `]`.

**`lexer/token.go`**: Add `RETYPES` keyword token + entries in `tokenNames` and `keywords` maps.

### Step 2: AST — new node types

**`ast/ast.go`**: Add two nodes:
- `ArrayLiteral` (Expression) — `Token`, `Elements []Expression`
- `RetypesDecl` (Statement) — `Token`, `IsVal`, `TargetType`, `IsArray`, `ArraySize`, `Name`, `Source`

### Step 3: Parser — untyped VAL abbreviations (~170 errors fixed)

**`parser/parser.go` → `parseAbbreviation()`**: After the `[]` open-array check (line 325-329), before the `isTypeToken` check (line 332), detect: if `curToken` is IDENT and `peekToken` is IS, it's an untyped abbreviation `VAL <name> IS <expr> :`. Parse with `Type = ""`.

### Step 4: Parser — array literal expressions (~340 errors fixed)

**`parser/parser.go` → `parseExpression()` LBRACKET case (line 2591)**: After `[`, parse first expression, then:
- COMMA → array literal: continue parsing comma-separated elements until `]`
- FROM → slice expression (existing logic)
- FOR → slice shorthand (existing logic)
- RBRACKET → single-element array literal

### Step 5: Parser — RETYPES declarations (~7 errors fixed)

**`parser/parser.go` → `parseAbbreviation()`**: After parsing `VAL [n]<type> <name>`, if next token is RETYPES (instead of IS), parse as `RetypesDecl`. Handle both `VAL INT X RETYPES X :` and `VAL [2]INT X RETYPES X :`.

### Step 6: Parser — multi-line expression continuation (~80 errors fixed)

**`parser/parser.go` → `parseBinaryExpr()` (line 2680)**: After `p.nextToken()` past the operator, skip NEWLINE/INDENT tokens (tracking indent count). After parsing RHS, consume matching NEWLINE+DEDENT pairs to restore indent balance. This handles `expr AND\n  expr` patterns.

### Step 7: Codegen — untyped VAL + array literals

**`codegen/codegen.go`**:
- Package-level abbreviations with `Type == ""`: emit `var name = expr` (omit type, let Go infer)
- `ArrayLiteral`: emit `[]int{e1, e2, ...}` (all float_io.occ arrays are INT)
- Add `ArrayLiteral` case to `containsX` scanner functions

### Step 8: Codegen — RETYPES

**`codegen/codegen.go`**:
- `VAL INT X RETYPES X :` → `X := int(math.Float32bits(float32(X)))`
- `VAL [2]INT X RETYPES X :` → `_tmp := math.Float64bits(float64(X)); X := [2]int{int(uint32(_tmp)), int(uint32(_tmp >> 32))}`
- Set `needMath = true`

### Step 9: Codegen — transputer intrinsic helpers

**`codegen/codegen.go`**:
- Add `transpIntrinsics` map for LONGPROD/LONGDIV/LONGSUM/LONGDIFF/NORMALISE/SHIFTRIGHT/SHIFTLEFT
- In `generateFuncCallExpr()`: prefix intrinsic names with `_`
- Add `containsIntrinsics()` scanner → `needMathBits` flag → `"math/bits"` import
- Emit 7 Go helper functions (using `uint64`/`uint32` arithmetic for 32-bit transputer semantics)

### Step 10: Codegen — CAUSEERROR

**`codegen/codegen.go` → `generateProcCall()`**: If name is `CAUSEERROR`, emit `panic("CAUSEERROR")`.

### Step 11: Tests

- Parser unit tests: untyped VAL, array literal, RETYPES, multi-line expressions
- Codegen unit tests: array literal output, RETYPES output, intrinsic output, CAUSEERROR output
- E2E tests: untyped VAL usage, array literal indexing, multi-line boolean, intrinsic calls with known values

### Step 12: Integration verification

```bash
go build -o occam2go .
./occam2go -I kroc/modules/course/libsrc -D TARGET.BITS.PER.WORD=32 -o /tmp/course_out.go kroc/modules/course/libsrc/course.module
go vet /tmp/course_out.go
go test ./...
```

## Files Modified

| File | Changes |
|------|---------|
| `lexer/lexer.go` | `[`/`]` parenDepth tracking (2 lines) |
| `lexer/token.go` | RETYPES keyword (3 additions) |
| `ast/ast.go` | ArrayLiteral + RetypesDecl nodes |
| `parser/parser.go` | Untyped VAL, array literals, RETYPES, multi-line continuation |
| `codegen/codegen.go` | Array literal gen, RETYPES gen, intrinsic helpers, CAUSEERROR |
| `codegen/e2e_*_test.go` | New E2E tests |
| `codegen/codegen_test.go` | New unit tests |
| `parser/parser_test.go` | New parser tests |
File created successfully at: /home/david/.claude/plans/curious-honking-whisper.md
ExitPlanMode
{
  "allowedPrompts": [
    {
      "tool": "Bash",
      "prompt": "build the project with go build"
    },
    {
      "tool": "Bash",
      "prompt": "run tests with go test"
    },
    {
      "tool": "Bash",
      "prompt": "transpile course module for verification"
    },
    {
      "tool": "Bash",
      "prompt": "run go vet on generated output"
    }
  ],
  "plan": "# Phase 2: Full Course Module Transpilation (float_io.occ)\n\n## Context\n\nThe transpiler cleanly processes `course_nofloat.module` but produces 598 parse errors on the full `course.module` because `float_io.occ` uses 6 unimplemented constructs. All 598 errors trace to 4 parse-level root causes plus 2 codegen-only features.\n\n## Implementation Plan\n\n### Step 1: Lexer — bracket NEWLINE suppression + RETYPES keyword\n\n**`lexer/lexer.go`**: Add `[`/`]` tracking to `parenDepth` so NEWLINEs inside `[...]` are suppressed (needed for multi-line array literals like `VAL PowerTenFrac IS [#80000000, #A0000000, ...] :`). Just add `l.parenDepth++` on `[` and `l.parenDepth--` on `]`.\n\n**`lexer/token.go`**: Add `RETYPES` keyword token + entries in `tokenNames` and `keywords` maps.\n\n### Step 2: AST — new node types\n\n**`ast/ast.go`**: Add two nodes:\n- `ArrayLiteral` (Expression) — `Token`, `Elements []Expression`\n- `RetypesDecl` (Statement) — `Token`, `IsVal`, `TargetType`, `IsArray`, `ArraySize`, `Name`, `Source`\n\n### Step 3: Parser — untyped VAL abbreviations (~170 errors fixed)\n\n**`parser/parser.go` → `parseAbbreviation()`**: After the `[]` open-array check (line 325-329), before the `isTypeToken` check (line 332), detect: if `curToken` is IDENT and `peekToken` is IS, it's an untyped abbreviation `VAL <name> IS <expr> :`. Parse with `Type = \"\"`.\n\n### Step 4: Parser — array literal expressions (~340 errors fixed)\n\n**`parser/parser.go` → `parseExpression()` LBRACKET case (line 2591)**: After `[`, parse first expression, then:\n- COMMA → array literal: continue parsing comma-separated elements until `]`\n- FROM → slice expression (existing logic)\n- FOR → slice shorthand (existing logic)\n- RBRACKET → single-element array literal\n\n### Step 5: Parser — RETYPES declarations (~7 errors fixed)\n\n**`parser/parser.go` → `parseAbbreviation()`**: After parsing `VAL [n]<type> <name>`, if next token is RETYPES (instead of IS), parse as `RetypesDecl`. Handle both `VAL INT X RETYPES X :` and `VAL [2]INT X RETYPES X :`.\n\n### Step 6: Parser — multi-line expression continuation (~80 errors fixed)\n\n**`parser/parser.go` → `parseBinaryExpr()` (line 2680)**: After `p.nextToken()` past the operator, skip NEWLINE/INDENT tokens (tracking indent count). After parsing RHS, consume matching NEWLINE+DEDENT pairs to restore indent balance. This handles `expr AND\\n  expr` patterns.\n\n### Step 7: Codegen — untyped VAL + array literals\n\n**`codegen/codegen.go`**:\n- Package-level abbreviations with `Type == \"\"`: emit `var name = expr` (omit type, let Go infer)\n- `ArrayLiteral`: emit `[]int{e1, e2, ...}` (all float_io.occ arrays are INT)\n- Add `ArrayLiteral` case to `containsX` scanner functions\n\n### Step 8: Codegen — RETYPES\n\n**`codegen/codegen.go`**:\n- `VAL INT X RETYPES X :` → `X := int(math.Float32bits(float32(X)))`\n- `VAL [2]INT X RETYPES X :` → `_tmp := math.Float64bits(float64(X)); X := [2]int{int(uint32(_tmp)), int(uint32(_tmp >> 32))}`\n- Set `needMath = true`\n\n### Step 9: Codegen — transputer intrinsic helpers\n\n**`codegen/codegen.go`**:\n- Add `transpIntrinsics` map for LONGPROD/LONGDIV/LONGSUM/LONGDIFF/NORMALISE/SHIFTRIGHT/SHIFTLEFT\n- In `generateFuncCallExpr()`: prefix intrinsic names with `_`\n- Add `containsIntrinsics()` scanner → `needMathBits` flag → `\"math/bits\"` import\n- Emit 7 Go helper functions (using `uint64`/`uint32` arithmetic for 32-bit transputer semantics)\n\n### Step 10: Codegen — CAUSEERROR\n\n**`codegen/codegen.go` → `generateProcCall()`**: If name is `CAUSEERROR`, emit `panic(\"CAUSEERROR\")`.\n\n### Step 11: Tests\n\n- Parser unit tests: untyped VAL, array literal, RETYPES, multi-line expressions\n- Codegen unit tests: array literal output, RETYPES output, intrinsic output, CAUSEERROR output\n- E2E tests: untyped VAL usage, array literal indexing, multi-line boolean, intrinsic calls with known values\n\n### Step 12: Integration verification\n\n```bash\ngo build -o occam2go .\n./occam2go -I kroc/modules/course/libsrc -D TARGET.BITS.PER.WORD=32 -o /tmp/course_out.go kroc/modules/course/libsrc/course.module\ngo vet /tmp/course_out.go\ngo test ./...\n```\n\n## Files Modified\n\n| File | Changes |\n|------|---------|\n| `lexer/lexer.go` | `[`/`]` parenDepth tracking (2 lines) |\n| `lexer/token.go` | RETYPES keyword (3 additions) |\n| `ast/ast.go` | ArrayLiteral + RetypesDecl nodes |\n| `parser/parser.go` | Untyped VAL, array literals, RETYPES, multi-line continuation |\n| `codegen/codegen.go` | Array literal gen, RETYPES gen, intrinsic helpers, CAUSEERROR |\n| `codegen/e2e_*_test.go` | New E2E tests |\n| `codegen/codegen_test.go` | New unit tests |\n| `parser/parser_test.go` | New parser tests |\n"
}
The user doesn't want to proceed with this tool use. The tool use was rejected (eg. if it was a file edit, the new_string was NOT written to the file). STOP what you are doing and wait for the user to tell you how to proceed.

[Request interrupted by user for tool use]