Claude Code transcript

7 prompts · 85 messages · 31 tool calls · 0 commits · 2 pages

#1

Please take another look at progress on issue #43 in light of the recent fixes for generated golang validity problems.

8 bash

Here's the updated picture. The recent fixes have made significant progress:

Current results: 10/16 transpile, 10/16 pass go vet

File Transpile go vet Status
hello_world.occ OK OK
hello_seq_world.occ OK OK
hello_raw_world.occ OK OK
echoing.occ OK OK
double_echo.occ OK OK
commstime.occ OK OK
cast.occ OK OK Fixed by #56 (boolVars scoping) + #53 + #54
casting.occ OK OK Fixed by #56 + #53 + #54
sort_pump.occ OK OK Fixed by #55 (typed abbrev) + #57 (chan array dir)
sort_pump_2.occ OK OK Fixed by #55 + #57
bar.occ FAIL PRI ALT, SHARED/CLAIM, dotted protocol tags, AFTER, guarded ALT, multi-dim arrays
demo.occ FAIL tim ? AFTER, MOBILE
sort_inside.occ FAIL Expression-sized arrays ([expr]TYPE)
sort_inside_2.occ FAIL SIZE monitor?, tim ? AFTER
test_bell.occ FAIL Multi-value CASE labels
test_utils.occ FAIL Multi-dim arrays ([][n]TYPE), *" string escape

Summary of progress since the issue was opened

  • Originally: 5/16 transpile, 5/16 pass go vet
  • After #44, #45, #46: 10/16 transpile, 6/16 pass go vet
  • After #53, #54, #55, #56, #57/current branch: 10/16 transpile, 10/16 pass go vet

All 4 files that were transpiling but failing go vet are now clean. The remaining 6 files all fail at parse time due to unimplemented language features.

Remaining blockers for the final 6 files

Feature Files blocked Difficulty
tim ? AFTER expr demo.occ, sort_inside_2.occ, bar.occ Medium — needs parser + codegen for timer AFTER input
Multi-value CASE labels ('*n', '*c') test_bell.occ Easy — extend CASE label parsing to accept comma-separated values
Expression-sized arrays ([expr]TYPE) sort_inside.occ Medium — parser currently expects literal size
SIZE monitor? (SIZE of direction-annotated name) sort_inside_2.occ Easy — strip direction suffix in SIZE expression
Multi-dim arrays ([][n]TYPE) test_utils.occ, bar.occ Medium
*" string escape test_utils.occ Easy — add escape sequence to lexer
PRI ALT / guarded ALT / SHARED/CLAIM / dotted protocol tags bar.occ only Hard — bar.occ needs many features

The easiest wins to unblock more files would be multi-value CASE labels (unblocks test_bell.occ) and tim ? AFTER (unblocks demo.occ and sort_inside_2.occ, partially unblocks bar.occ).

#2

Thank you. Please add a comment to the main bug report with your latest findings then open a set of new issues to cover the remaining unimplemented features you've listed above.

13 bash

Done. Here's what I posted:

Comment on #43 — Updated status showing 10/16 files now fully passing go vet (up from 5/16 when the issue was opened), with a progress timeline and links to all new issues.

9 new issues created:

# Feature Easiest wins
#60 tim ? AFTER expr (timer delay) Unblocks 3 files
#61 Multi-value CASE labels Unblocks test_bell.occ
#62 Expression-sized arrays Unblocks sort_inside.occ
#63 SIZE of direction-annotated name Unblocks sort_inside_2.occ (with #60)
#64 Multi-dimensional arrays Unblocks test_utils.occ (with #65)
#65 *" string escape Small lexer change
#66 PRI ALT bar.occ only
#67 Guarded ALT with boolean conditions bar.occ only
#68 Dotted protocol tags bar.occ only

SHARED/CLAIM and MOBILE were already tracked in #40. The bar.occ file remains the hardest to unblock since it depends on 6+ features including the occam-pi extensions.

#3

Thank you. Great work. One thing though: in the summary above you helpfully provided an assesment of the relative implementation difficulty of the remaining issues. However I don't see that difficulty information in either the main bug summary comment nor the newly opened issues. Apologies if it's there and I missed it. It would be useful to capture that information for future project planning.

10 bash
#4

Thank you!

#6

/exit exit

#7

Bye!

#5

Caveat: The messages below were generated by the user while running local commands. DO NOT respond to these messages or otherwise consider them in your response unless the user explicitly asks you to.