Claude Code transcript - page 2/8

Yes please go ahead. Perhaps also think about how backup would be integrated into the stack command structure? E.g. would we have a "stack deploy backup status" command, and so on?

Thinking

Let me study the existing command structure so the CLI proposal fits the grain rather than inventing something foreign.

$ Bash
Map CLI command structure
grep -n "add_command\|@click.group\|@click.command\|def cli\|cli.add\|\.add_command\|@.*\.command\|@.*\.group" src/stack/main.py | head -60
45:@click.group(context_settings=CONTEXT_SETTINGS, cls=StackCLI)
56:def cli(ctx, profile, quiet, verbose, log_file, dry_run, debug):
82:cli.add_command(build.command, "build")
83:cli.add_command(chart.command, "chart")
84:cli.add_command(checklist.command, "check")
85:cli.add_command(complete.command, "complete")
86:cli.add_command(config.command, "config")
87:cli.add_command(deployment_create.create, "deploy")
88:cli.add_command(fetch.command, "fetch")
89:cli.add_command(init.command, "init")
90:cli.add_command(list_stack.command, "list")
91:cli.add_command(deployment.command, "manage")
92:cli.add_command(prepare.command, "prepare")
93:cli.add_command(update.command, "update")
94:cli.add_command(version.command, "version")
95:cli.add_command(webapp.command, "webapp")
$ Bash
Find manage command implementation
ls src/stack/deploy/*.py; echo "=== manage command ==="; grep -rn "manage\|def command\|@click" src/stack/deploy/manage*.py src/stack/manage*.py 2>/dev/null | head -40
src/stack/deploy/__init__.py
src/stack/deploy/deploy.py
src/stack/deploy/deploy_types.py
src/stack/deploy/deploy_util.py
src/stack/deploy/deployer.py
src/stack/deploy/deployer_factory.py
src/stack/deploy/deployment.py
src/stack/deploy/deployment_context.py
src/stack/deploy/deployment_create.py
src/stack/deploy/explain.py
src/stack/deploy/images.py
src/stack/deploy/spec.py
src/stack/deploy/stack.py
=== manage command ===
Thinking
$ Bash
Inspect manage subcommands
grep -n "@click\|def command\|add_command\|@command\|\.command()\|group\|ctx.invoke\|start\|stop\|\"ps\"\|logs\|exec" src/stack/deploy/deployment.py | head -60
31:    exec_operation,
32:    logs_operation,
44:@click.group()
45:@click.option("--dir", required=True, help="path to deployment directory")
46:@click.pass_context
47:def command(ctx, dir):
48:    """manage a deployed stack (start, stop, etc.)"""
83:@command.command()
84:@click.pass_context
91:@command.command()
92:@click.option(
97:@click.option(
102:@click.argument("extra_args", nargs=-1)  # help: command: start <service1> <service2>
103:@click.pass_context
104:def start(ctx, stay_attached, skip_cluster_management, extra_args):
105:    """start the deployment"""
111:@command.command()
112:@click.option("--delete-volumes/--preserve-volumes", default=False, help="delete data volumes")
113:@click.option(
118:@click.argument("extra_args", nargs=-1)  # help: command: down <service1> <service2>
119:@click.pass_context
120:def stop(ctx, delete_volumes, skip_cluster_management, extra_args):
121:    """stop the deployment and remove the containers"""
127:@command.command()
128:@click.pass_context
135:@command.command()
136:@click.pass_context
144:@command.command()
145:@click.argument("extra_args", nargs=-1)  # help: command: port <service1> <service2>
146:@click.pass_context
153:@command.command()
154:@click.argument("extra_args", nargs=-1)  # help: command: exec <service> <command>
155:@click.pass_context
156:def exec(ctx, extra_args):
157:    """execute a command inside a container"""
159:    exec_operation(ctx, extra_args)
162:@command.command()
163:@click.option("--tail", "-n", default=None, help="number of lines to display")
164:@click.option("--follow", "-f", is_flag=True, default=False, help="follow log output")
165:@click.argument("extra_args", nargs=-1)  # help: command: logs <service1> <service2>
166:@click.pass_context
167:def logs(ctx, tail, follow, extra_args):
168:    """get logs for running containers"""
170:    logs_operation(ctx, tail, follow, extra_args)
173:@command.command()
174:@click.pass_context
181:@command.command()
182:@click.pass_context
189:@command.command()
190:@click.pass_context
Thinking

The structure is clear now:

  • stack deploy = create a deployment (one-shot, from specs).
  • stack manage --dir <dir> <verb> = operate on an existing deployment β€” a Click group with start/stop/ps/logs/exec/port subcommands (deployment.py:44).

So backup operations belong under stack manage … backup <verb>, not under deploy (which only creates). I'll fold that reasoning into the doc. Writing it now.

πŸ“ Write backup.md
/home/david/projects/bpi/stack/docs/backup.md
# Backup &amp; Restore

> **Status: design proposal β€” not yet implemented.** This document describes the intended design for
> backing up and restoring service data. It is written to be reviewed and refined before any code is
> written. Where it describes commands or behaviour, read those as *proposed*.

Stacks keep their software components and configuration under revision control in git. Once a stack is
running, however, it accumulates **persistent data** in mounted volumes that git does not track. This
document describes how that data is backed up to object storage (S3) and restored from a previous epoch.

The approach mirrors the [ingress](./ingress.md) design: a small amount of generated configuration wires
a backup capability into any stack, transparently across both deployment targets (Docker Compose and
Kubernetes), while leaning on a mature, off-the-shelf engine to do the actual work.

## Engine: restic

All backups β€” on both targets β€” are stored as a [restic](https://restic.net) repository. restic is the
contract, not an implementation detail:

- **Client-side encryption is mandatory** (AES-256). The payload is encrypted *before* upload, so the
  object store never sees plaintext. This is what makes backing up to commodity object storage acceptable.
- **Content-addressed dedup + incremental snapshots.** A daily backup of a mostly-static volume costs
  almost nothing.
- **Snapshots and retention policies** give point-in-time restore (your "previous epoch").
- **Native S3 backend** (and any S3-compatible store: MinIO, Wasabi, etc.).

Standardising on the restic repository format means a backup written on the Docker target is restorable on
the Kubernetes target and vice-versa, and that in a pinch an operator can restore with the bare `restic`
CLI from outside the deployment entirely.

The two targets differ only in *what runs restic and how it is scheduled*:

| Concern            | Docker                                            | Kubernetes                                   |
| ------------------ | ------------------------------------------------- | -------------------------------------------- |
| Engine / format    | restic (off-the-shelf restic container image)     | restic (via **K8up**)                        |
| Scheduling         | cron in the backup container                      | K8up `Schedule` resource                     |
| Quiesce / hooks    | pre/post hooks in the backup container            | `k8up.io/backupcommand` pod annotation       |
| Config generation  | `stack` injects config at deploy time             | `stack` emits K8up resources                 |
| Prerequisites      | the mixed-in `backup` stack                       | the `cluster` tool ensures K8up is present   |
| Restore            | start-stripped β†’ restic restore β†’ start full      | K8up `Restore` into freshly-created PVCs     |

## Annotations

Which data gets backed up β€” and how it is made consistent β€” is described with comment-based annotations in
`composefile.yml`, exactly as HTTP routes are for ingress.

By default, **all read-write named volumes** in a deployment are backed up (file-level). Annotations are
used to *exclude* volumes or to add an *application-consistent logical dump* for stateful services such as
databases.

```yaml
services:
  db:
    image: bozemanpass/todo-db:stack
    volumes:
      - "pgdata:/var/lib/postgresql/data"   # @stack backup-exclude
    # Prefer a consistent logical dump over a file-level copy of a live database.
    # @stack backup-command pg_dump -U postgres -d todos
    # @stack backup-file-extension sql

  backend:
    image: bozemanpass/todo-backend:stack
    volumes:
      - "uploads:/app/uploads"              # backed up by default (file-level)

volumes:
  pgdata:
  uploads:
```

| Annotation                          | Applies to     | Meaning                                                                 |
| ----------------------------------- | -------------- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------- |
| `@stack backup-exclude`             | a volume mount | Do not include this volume in the file-level backup.                    |
| `@stack backup-command <cmd>`       | a service      | Run `<cmd>` in the container and capture its stdout into the backup.    |
| `@stack backup-file-extension <ext>`| a service      | Name the captured `backup-command` output with this extension.          |

These map **one-to-one** onto K8up's pod annotations on the Kubernetes target (`k8up.io/backupcommand`,
`k8up.io/file-extension`, and PVC exclusion), and onto pre-backup hooks in the restic container on the
Docker target. The same annotations drive both.

### Why a logical dump matters

The ingress analogy is reassuring but slightly misleading: ingress is *stateless*, whereas backup is
*deeply stateful*. A file-level copy of a database's data directory **while it is being written** can
produce a torn, unrestorable snapshot. For such services, prefer `@stack backup-command` (e.g. `pg_dump`)
and `@stack backup-exclude` the underlying data volume.

## Enabling backup

As with ingress, the backup capability is **mixed in** to a deployment. The connection details for the
object store and the encryption key are supplied as configuration, the same way the ACME/Let's Encrypt
settings are supplied to the ingress stack.

```bash
# Fetch the backup stack.
$ stack fetch repo bozemanpass/backup-stack

# Configure the object store + encryption key for this deployment.
$ stack init --stack backup \
  --output ~/specs/backup.yml \
  --config BACKUP_S3_ENDPOINT=s3.us-west-2.amazonaws.com \
  --config BACKUP_S3_BUCKET=my-stack-backups \
  --config AWS_ACCESS_KEY_ID=AKIA... \
  --config AWS_SECRET_ACCESS_KEY=... \
  --config RESTIC_PASSWORD=... \
  --config BACKUP_SCHEDULE="0 3 * * *" \
  --config BACKUP_RETENTION="--keep-daily 7 --keep-weekly 4 --keep-monthly 6"

# Init the application stack as usual.
$ stack fetch repo bozemanpass/example-todo-list
$ stack prepare --stack todo
$ stack init --stack todo --output ~/specs/todo.yml

# "Mix in" the backup stack at deployment time.
$ stack deploy \
  --spec-file ~/specs/backup.yml \
  --spec-file ~/specs/todo.yml \
  --deployment-dir ~/deployments/todo

$ stack manage --dir ~/deployments/todo start
```

> The encryption key and object-store credentials are **secrets**. They live in the deployment's generated
> configuration (and as a Kubernetes `Secret`), never in a spec under git.

## How Docker backup works

Like ingress, the stack tool does **not** write the backup engine's job logic by hand. It generates
configuration for an existing restic container image and lets that image do the work. The backup service
cannot be a purely *static* mix-in, because at the time its image is built it does not know which volumes
the application stack will contribute β€” and naming them statically would collide with the merge step,
which requires unique volume names across mixed-in specs.

Instead, the volume wiring is **injected at deploy time**, precisely parallel to the way `deploy` injects
`VIRTUAL_HOST_MULTIPORTS` environment variables into matching services for ingress:

1. **Annotations to spec** β€” during `stack init`, the `@stack backup-*` annotations are parsed out of
   `composefile.yml` into a `backup` section of the output spec.

2. **Spec to backup container** β€” during `stack deploy`, the tool reads the merged deployment's volumes
   (`Spec.get_volumes()`) and:
   - mounts every backed-up volume **read-only** into the backup container
     (`- <volume>:/backup/<volume>:ro`), and
   - injects the schedule, retention, object-store, and per-service `backup-command` hook settings as
     environment / config for the container.

3. **The backup container runs restic on a schedule** β€” on each cron tick it runs any configured
   pre-backup hooks (the logical dumps) and then `restic backup` of the mounted volume tree, pruning
   per the retention policy.

Because every named volume on the Docker target is already realised as a bind mount under
`<deployment-dir>/data/<volume-name>/`, the set of paths to back up is fully deterministic.

## Kubernetes

On Kubernetes the work is delegated to [K8up](https://k8up.io), a restic-based backup operator. This
follows the same assume-present contract the stack tool already uses for `ingress-nginx` and
`cert-manager`: `stack` does not install K8up; it only emits resources that *reference* it.

- During `stack deploy`, the tool emits a K8up `Schedule` for the deployment's namespace (one namespace
  per deployment), so all of its PVCs are backed up, together with `k8up.io/backupcommand` /
  `k8up.io/file-extension` annotations derived from the `@stack backup-*` annotations.
- K8up writes a **standard restic repository** to the same object store, with the same encryption β€” so the
  repositories are interchangeable with those produced on the Docker target.

K8up itself is provisioned by the **`cluster`** tool (the batteries-included checker/fixer for required
cluster components), exactly as `cluster` is responsible for `cert-manager` and `ingress-nginx`. A
backup-enabled deployment fails recognisably β€” the same way an ingress deployment fails today when
`cert-manager` is absent β€” if K8up has not been provisioned. The readiness probe is concrete: K8up's CRDs
registered and its operator `Deployment` healthy.

> Because the deployment uses a single node (or node affinity to co-locate data), K8up's backup `Job` can
> mount the `ReadWriteOnce` PVCs alongside the running application pod. Cross-node volume access is
> explicitly out of scope.

## Restore

Restore is deliberately modelled as a distinct mode rather than a live operation, which neatly sidesteps
the problem of two consumers mounting the same volume at once. At restore time **nothing else holds the
volumes**, so even `ReadWriteOnce` PVCs can be attached by the restore job.

The flow:

1. The full stack is stopped (if running).
2. The volumes are (re)created empty.
3. A **backup-only** variant of the deployment is brought up, running a restore of the chosen snapshot:
   - **Docker:** bring up only the backup service with a restore command, restoring into the now-empty
     bind-mounted volumes.
   - **Kubernetes:** create a K8up `Restore` resource targeting the freshly-created PVCs.
4. The backup-only variant is torn down once the restore completes.
5. The full stack is started; its volumes now contain the restored data.

This is driven by a single command (see below) so the operator does not orchestrate the steps by hand.

## Command structure

Backup *configuration* is established at `init` / `deploy` time (above). Backup *operations* act on an
existing deployment, so they live under `stack manage --dir <dir>`, alongside `start`, `stop`, `ps`, and
`logs` β€” **not** under `stack deploy`, which only *creates* a deployment.

```
stack manage --dir <dir> backup <subcommand>
```

| Command                                                        | Description                                                        |
| -------------------------------------------------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------ |
| `stack manage --dir <dir> backup now`                          | Run a backup immediately, outside the schedule.                    |
| `stack manage --dir <dir> backup status`                       | Show the result of the last run and repository health.             |
| `stack manage --dir <dir> backup list`                         | List snapshots (the available epochs) with timestamps and tags.    |
| `stack manage --dir <dir> backup restore [--snapshot <id>]`    | Orchestrate the full stop β†’ restore β†’ restart flow. Defaults to the latest snapshot; `--volume <name>` restores a single volume. `--and-start` restarts the full stack on completion. |
| `stack manage --dir <dir> backup prune`                        | Apply the retention policy (`forget` + `prune`).                   |
| `stack manage --dir <dir> backup check`                        | Verify repository integrity.                                       |

`backup` is a Click sub-group of the existing `manage` group, so it inherits `--dir` and the deployment
context. Internally each subcommand dispatches to the active target: on Docker it `exec`s restic in the
backup container (or runs a one-off restore deployment); on Kubernetes it creates/reads the corresponding
K8up resources.

> The earlier sketch of `stack deploy backup status` is intentionally **not** the chosen shape: `deploy`
> creates a deployment from specs and exits, whereas backup status/restore/list are operations *on an
> existing* deployment β€” which is precisely what `manage` is for.

## Open questions

- **Engine choice.** restic is proposed for its simplicity and K8up compatibility. Kopia (Velero's default,
  better at very large volumes) is the main alternative; both produce encrypted, deduplicated repositories,
  but the repository formats are *not* mutually compatible, so this choice must be made once, up front.
- **Off-the-shelf Docker image.** Candidates that preserve the restic-repo format include
  `mazzolino/restic` and `lobaro/restic-backup-docker`. (`offen/docker-volume-backup` is feature-rich but
  defaults to tar+GPG, which would break cross-target compatibility.)
- **Secret delivery.** Exactly how the restic password and object-store credentials flow from
  configuration into the Docker container env and the Kubernetes `Secret`.
- **Monitoring.** Surfacing backup success/failure (a healthcheck or status that `backup status` can read)
  so that a silently failing backup is not mistaken for a working one.
- **New repository.** The Docker backup stack lives in its own repo (e.g. `bozemanpass/backup-stack`),
  mirroring `bozemanpass/docker-ingress-stack`.
File created successfully at: /home/david/projects/bpi/stack/docs/backup.md (file state is current in your context β€” no need to Read it back)
Thinking

Done β€” written to docs/backup.md, structured to mirror docs/ingress.md (annotations β†’ enabling β†’ how-it-works β†’ k8s β†’ restore), and clearly marked design proposal, not yet implemented so it isn't mistaken for shipped behaviour.

On the CLI question specifically, the codebase made the answer clear-cut. There are two relevant verbs today:

  • stack deploy creates a deployment from specs and exits.
  • stack manage --dir <dir> <verb> is a Click group that operates on an existing deployment (start/stop/ps/logs/exec/port β€” deployment.py:44).

Backup status/list/restore are operations on an existing deployment, so they belong under manage, not deploy. So rather than your stack deploy backup status sketch, the doc proposes:

stack manage --dir <dir> backup now        # run a backup off-schedule
stack manage --dir <dir> backup status     # last-run result + repo health
stack manage --dir <dir> backup list       # snapshots = the epochs
stack manage --dir <dir> backup restore [--snapshot <id>] [--volume <name>] [--and-start]
stack manage --dir <dir> backup prune      # apply retention
stack manage --dir <dir> backup check      # verify repo integrity

backup is a sub-group of manage, so it inherits --dir and the deployment context for free, and each subcommand dispatches to the active target under the hood (exec restic in the container on Docker; create/read K8up resources on k8s). I called out the deploy vs manage reasoning explicitly in the doc so the choice is defensible on review. Configuration (S3 endpoint, credentials, encryption key, schedule, retention) stays at init/deploy time via --config, exactly like the ingress ACME settings.

Two things I flagged as open questions worth your call before any code:

  1. restic vs kopia β€” must be decided once; the repo formats aren't interchangeable. I've written the doc assuming restic (simplest, and it's what K8up speaks).
  2. Secret delivery β€” how the restic password and object-store creds flow into the Docker container env and the k8s Secret. This is a prerequisite, not an afterthought.

Want me to refine any section β€” e.g. nail down the @stack backup-* annotation schema further, or sketch the deploy-time injection pass (the get_volumes() β†’ backup-container-mounts code) as the first implementation step?

Yes you can work on refining the details. I think restic is a good choice. I am wondering about the need for the annotation scheme. Do you think it would be possible to just backup all volumes and provide any required metadata from the stack environment? Perhaps use annotation to override the default (e.g. skip backup for specific volumes). I'm concerned we keep the feature as transparent as possible, ideally just "backup my stuff" without any need to provide further information (where to backup and what credentials to use could be sourced from the environment by default).

Thinking

Good instinct β€” "backup my stuff" with zero ceremony is the right north star. Let me check how the profile/config system works, because that's what determines how much can be sourced ambiently from the environment versus stated per-deployment.

$ Bash
Inspect config/profile system
ls src/stack/config/ && echo "=== config command ===" && grep -rn "def \|@click\|profile\|environ\|getenv\|os.environ" src/stack/config/*.py | head -40
__init__.py
__pycache__
config.py
util.py
=== config command ===
src/stack/config/config.py:24:def set_config_value(key, value):
src/stack/config/config.py:61:@click.group()
src/stack/config/config.py:62:@click.pass_context
src/stack/config/config.py:63:def command(ctx):
src/stack/config/config.py:70:@click.command()
src/stack/config/config.py:71:@click.pass_context
src/stack/config/config.py:72:def show(ctx):
src/stack/config/config.py:80:@click.command()
src/stack/config/config.py:81:@click.argument("key", required=True)
src/stack/config/config.py:82:@click.pass_context
src/stack/config/config.py:83:def get(ctx, key):
src/stack/config/config.py:99:@click.command()
src/stack/config/config.py:100:@click.argument("key", required=True)
src/stack/config/config.py:101:@click.argument("value", required=False)
src/stack/config/config.py:102:@click.pass_context
src/stack/config/config.py:103:def set(ctx, key, value):
src/stack/config/config.py:109:@click.command()
src/stack/config/config.py:110:@click.argument("key", required=True)
src/stack/config/config.py:111:@click.pass_context
src/stack/config/config.py:112:def unset(ctx, key):
src/stack/config/util.py:25:def get_config_dir():
src/stack/config/util.py:29:def get_config_file_path():
src/stack/config/util.py:30:    return get_config_dir().joinpath(os.environ.get("STACK_CONFIG_PROFILE", "config") + ".yml")
src/stack/config/util.py:33:def get_config():
src/stack/config/util.py:42:def save_config(config):
src/stack/config/util.py:51:def get_config_setting(key, default=None):
src/stack/config/util.py:56:    # Check environment first
src/stack/config/util.py:83:def _get_from_env(key):
src/stack/config/util.py:87:    return os.environ.get(key, None)
src/stack/config/util.py:90:def _get_from_file(key):
src/stack/config/util.py:109:def get_dev_root_path():
src/stack/config/util.py:113:def debug_enabled():
$ Bash
Find existing environment-variable sourcing
grep -rn "getenv\|os.environ\|environ\[" src/stack/ --include=*.py | grep -vi test | head -30
src/stack/base.py:50:        url_from_environment = os.environ.get("STACK_NPM_REGISTRY_URL")
src/stack/util.py:29:STACK_USE_BUILTIN_STACK = "true" == os.environ.get("STACK_USE_BUILTIN_STACK", "false")
src/stack/util.py:54:def _sub_execute(cmd, env=os.environ, cwd=None, stdout_cb=output_subcmd, stderr_cb=output_subcmd):
src/stack/util.py:72:def run_shell_command(cmd, env=os.environ, cwd=None, quiet=False, check_result=True):
src/stack/constants.py:24:compose_file_prefix = os.environ.get("STACK_COMPOSE_FILE_PREFIX", "composefile")
src/stack/main.py:49:    "--profile", help="name of the configuration profile to use", default=os.environ.get("STACK_CONFIG_PROFILE", "config")
src/stack/main.py:75:        os.environ["STACK_CONFIG_PROFILE"] = command_options.profile
src/stack/main.py:77:        os.environ["STACK_DEBUG"] = str(command_options.debug)
src/stack/main.py:79:        os.environ["STACK_LOG_LEVEL"] = str(command_options.log_level)
src/stack/config/util.py:30:    return get_config_dir().joinpath(os.environ.get("STACK_CONFIG_PROFILE", "config") + ".yml")
src/stack/config/util.py:87:    return os.environ.get(key, None)
src/stack/build/build_util.py:201:            if os.path.exists(f"{os.environ['XDG_RUNTIME_DIR']}/containers/auth.json"):
src/stack/build/build_util.py:202:                auths = json.load(open(f"{os.environ['XDG_RUNTIME_DIR']}/containers/auth.json", "rt")).get("auths", {})
src/stack/deploy/deploy.py:67:        os.environ[attr] = value
src/stack/deploy/deploy.py:295:    command_env = os.environ.copy()
src/stack/build/build_containers.py:69:        "DOCKER_BUILDKIT": os.environ.get("DOCKER_BUILDKIT", default="1"),
src/stack/build/build_containers.py:74:    docker_host_env = os.getenv("DOCKER_HOST")
src/stack/build/build_containers.py:163:            build_envs["PATH"] = os.environ["PATH"]
src/stack/deploy/webapp/util.py:78:        github_token = os.environ.get("DEPLOYER_GITHUB_TOKEN")
src/stack/deploy/webapp/util.py:91:            git_env = dict(os.environ.copy())
src/stack/deploy/k8s/helpers.py:296:def _expand_shell_vars(raw_val: str, environ=os.environ) -> str:
src/stack/deploy/k8s/helpers.py:310:def envs_from_compose_file(compose_file_envs: Mapping[str, str], environ=os.environ) -> Mapping[str, str]:
Thinking

This is the key piece. Let me read the config-resolution function to confirm the precedence.

βš™ Read
{
  "file_path": "/home/david/projects/bpi/stack/src/stack/config/util.py",
  "offset": 51,
  "limit": 45
}
51	def get_config_setting(key, default=None):
52	    key = key.lower().replace("_", "-")
53	    if key.startswith("stack-"):
54	        key = key[6:]
55	
56	    # Check environment first
57	    ret = _get_from_env(key)
58	
59	    # Next check file
60	    if ret is None:
61	        ret = _get_from_file(key)
62	
63	    # Last check defaults
64	    if ret is None:
65	        # But only if we didn't get a default already
66	        if default is None:
67	            ret = _DEFAULTS.get(key, None)
68	
69	    if ret is not None:
70	        # If it is a ~/ path, expand it.
71	        if str(ret).startswith("~/"):
72	            ret = os.path.expanduser(str(ret))
73	        # And parse a boolean if it is a string.
74	        if str(ret).lower() in ["true", "false"]:
75	            ret = str(ret).lower() == "true"
76	
77	    if ret is None:
78	        return default
79	
80	    return ret
81	
82	
83	def _get_from_env(key):
84	    key = key.upper().replace("-", "_")
85	    if not key.startswith("STACK_"):
86	        key = "STACK_" + key
87	    return os.environ.get(key, None)
88	
89	
90	def _get_from_file(key):
91	    config = get_config()
92	
93	    parts = key.split(".")
94	    if len(parts) == 1:
95	        return config.get(key, None)
Thinking

That confirms the mechanism that makes your "zero ceremony" goal achievable. get_config_setting() (config/util.py:51) already resolves every setting with the precedence environment variable β†’ profile file β†’ built-in default. So backup destination, credentials, schedule, and retention can all be ambient: set once in a profile (or exported as STACK_* env vars), inherited by every deployment, never restated per-stack.

That reshapes the design substantially in the direction you want. Here's my thinking, then I'll rework the doc.

What can be fully automatic

  • Volume selection β€” yes, default to all read-write named volumes, derived from the merged spec (Spec.get_volumes()). The tool already knows them. No annotation required.
  • Destination, credentials, schedule, retention β€” sourced ambiently via the existing env β†’ profile β†’ default chain (STACK_BACKUP_S3_BUCKET, etc.). Configure a profile once; every deploy "just backs up."

So a stack with zero annotations and zero per-deploy flags gets all its volumes backed up. That's the "backup my stuff" baseline.

What annotations become (and why I'd keep two)

The key reframe: annotations are author-time metadata in the component's composefile.yml, not deployer-time input. Just like the ingress # @stack http-proxy /api annotations, they're written once by whoever authors the stack; the person deploying never sees or touches them. So keeping them does not violate your transparency goal β€” the deployer still types nothing.

I'd keep exactly two, both optional, both with safe defaults:

  1. @stack backup-exclude (opt-out) β€” for volumes that are caches / reconstructable scratch / huge and pointless to store. Absent β†’ the volume is backed up. Safe default is "back up."
  2. @stack backup-command (consistency) β€” the one genuinely irreducible escape hatch. This is the honest caveat: a file-level copy of a live database volume can be torn and unrestorable. The component author adds one line (pg_dump …); the deployer is none the wiser. Absent β†’ plain file-level backup.

Everything else I'd drop. No per-volume "include" annotation, no required schema.

The one thing that cannot be purely ambient: the encryption key

This is the trap in "source everything from the environment." restic cannot decrypt without its password. If the password is auto-generated and lives only in the profile/environment, then losing that environment means the backups are permanently unrecoverable β€” you'd have an encrypted bucket you can never read. So the restic password must either be explicitly set by the operator, or auto-generated and persisted + surfaced for escrow. I'll flag this prominently rather than let it hide inside "ambient config."

Enabling: one switch, not a spec-file dance

Rather than the deployer mixing in a backup.yml full of credentials, I'd make backup a profile-level capability: enabled by a single profile setting (or --backup flag), after which destination/creds/schedule are all ambient. On Docker that auto-injects the backup container at deploy time; on k8s it emits the K8up Schedule. Default off, one knob to turn it on, nothing further.

Let me rework the doc to reflect all this.

πŸ“ Write backup.md
/home/david/projects/bpi/stack/docs/backup.md
# Backup &amp; Restore

> **Status: design proposal β€” not yet implemented.** This document describes the intended design for
> backing up and restoring service data. It is written to be reviewed and refined before any code is
> written. Where it describes commands or behaviour, read those as *proposed*.

Stacks keep their software components and configuration under revision control in git. Once a stack is
running, however, it accumulates **persistent data** in mounted volumes that git does not track. This
document describes how that data is backed up to object storage (S3) and restored from a previous epoch.

## Design goal: "backup my stuff", and nothing more

The feature is designed to be as transparent as possible. In the common case the person deploying a stack
provides **no backup-specific information at all** β€” not which volumes to back up, not where to send them,
not on what schedule. Backup is configured once at the environment/profile level and then applies to every
deployment automatically.

This is achieved by deriving everything possible from what the stack tool already knows or can source
ambiently:

- **What to back up** is derived from the deployment itself: *all* read-write named volumes are backed up
  by default. The tool already enumerates them (`Spec.get_volumes()`).
- **Where to back up, with which credentials, on what schedule** is sourced from the environment using the
  existing configuration precedence (see [Configuration](#configuration)).

Annotations exist only to *refine* this default, and are written by the **author** of a stack, never by
the person deploying it.

## Engine: restic

All backups β€” on both targets β€” are stored as a [restic](https://restic.net) repository. restic is the
contract, not an implementation detail:

- **Client-side encryption is mandatory** (AES-256). The payload is encrypted *before* upload, so the
  object store never sees plaintext. This is what makes backing up to commodity object storage acceptable.
- **Content-addressed dedup + incremental snapshots.** A daily backup of a mostly-static volume costs
  almost nothing.
- **Snapshots and retention policies** give point-in-time restore (your "previous epoch").
- **Native S3 backend** (and any S3-compatible store: MinIO, Wasabi, etc.).

Standardising on the restic repository format means a backup written on the Docker target is restorable on
the Kubernetes target and vice-versa, and that in a pinch an operator can restore with the bare `restic`
CLI from outside the deployment entirely.

The two targets differ only in *what runs restic and how it is scheduled*:

| Concern            | Docker                                            | Kubernetes                                   |
| ------------------ | ------------------------------------------------- | -------------------------------------------- |
| Engine / format    | restic (off-the-shelf restic container image)     | restic (via **K8up**)                        |
| Scheduling         | cron in the backup container                      | K8up `Schedule` resource                     |
| Quiesce / hooks    | pre/post hooks in the backup container            | `k8up.io/backupcommand` pod annotation       |
| Config generation  | `stack` injects config at deploy time             | `stack` emits K8up resources                 |
| Prerequisites      | the auto-injected backup container                | the `cluster` tool ensures K8up is present   |
| Restore            | start-stripped β†’ restic restore β†’ start full      | K8up `Restore` into freshly-created PVCs     |

## Configuration

Backup settings are resolved with the standard stack configuration precedence
(`config/util.py:get_config_setting`): **environment variable β†’ active profile β†’ built-in default**. This
is what lets backup be ambient β€” set it once in a profile and every deployment under that profile inherits
it, with no per-stack input.

| Setting (profile key / `STACK_…` env var)   | Purpose                                         | Default        |
| ------------------------------------------- | ----------------------------------------------- | -------------- |
| `backup` / `STACK_BACKUP`                   | Master switch β€” enable backup for deployments.  | `false`        |
| `backup-s3-endpoint`                        | Object store endpoint.                          | β€”              |
| `backup-s3-bucket`                          | Bucket / repository location.                   | β€”              |
| `aws-access-key-id`, `aws-secret-access-key`| Object store credentials.                       | β€”              |
| `restic-password`                           | **Encryption key** (see warning below).         | β€”              |
| `backup-schedule`                           | Cron schedule.                                  | `0 3 * * *`    |
| `backup-retention`                          | `forget`/`prune` policy.                        | `--keep-daily 7 --keep-weekly 4 --keep-monthly 6` |

Typical one-time setup for an environment:

```bash
$ stack config set backup true
$ stack config set backup-s3-endpoint s3.us-west-2.amazonaws.com
$ stack config set backup-s3-bucket my-stack-backups
$ stack config set aws-access-key-id AKIA...
$ stack config set aws-secret-access-key ...
$ stack config set restic-password ...
```

After that, **every** deployment is backed up with no further action:

```bash
$ stack deploy --spec-file ~/specs/todo.yml --deployment-dir ~/deployments/todo
$ stack manage --dir ~/deployments/todo start
# ...the deployment's volumes are now backed up on the configured schedule.
```

> #### ⚠ The encryption key cannot be purely ephemeral
>
> restic cannot decrypt a repository without its password. If `restic-password` is auto-generated and
> lives *only* in an environment that is later lost, the backups become **permanently unrecoverable** β€” an
> encrypted bucket that can never be read. The password must therefore either be set explicitly by the
> operator, or be auto-generated **and persisted and surfaced for the operator to escrow**. This is the one
> piece of backup configuration that must not be treated as disposable ambient state. Object-store
> credentials, by contrast, can be rotated freely.

## Volume selection (automatic)

By default **all read-write named volumes** in a deployment are backed up, file-level. Read-only mounts and
config maps are skipped. No annotation or flag is required for this β€” it is derived entirely from the
merged spec.

The only optional refinement is to *exclude* a volume that is a cache, scratch space, or otherwise cheaply
reconstructable, using an annotation in the stack's `composefile.yml`:

```yaml
services:
  backend:
    image: bozemanpass/todo-backend:stack
    volumes:
      - "uploads:/app/uploads"              # backed up by default
      - "cache:/app/cache"                  # @stack backup-exclude
```

Excluding a volume is an **author** decision encoded in the component, not something the deployer supplies.

## Application consistency

This is the one place where "just back up everything" needs care, and it is worth stating plainly: the
ingress analogy is misleading because ingress is *stateless* whereas backup is *deeply stateful*. A
file-level copy of a **live database's** data directory, read file-by-file while the database writes, can
produce a torn, unrestorable snapshot.

For such services the stack author adds a single annotation specifying a logical dump command, whose stdout
is captured into the backup instead of (or alongside) the raw files:

```yaml
services:
  db:
    image: bozemanpass/todo-db:stack
    volumes:
      - "pgdata:/var/lib/postgresql/data"   # @stack backup-exclude
    # @stack backup-command pg_dump -U postgres -d todos
    # @stack backup-file-extension sql
```

Crucially this is **author-time** metadata: whoever packages the database component writes it once, and
every deployer of that stack gets consistent backups for free, having supplied nothing. The annotation maps
one-to-one onto K8up's `k8up.io/backupcommand` / `k8up.io/file-extension` pod annotations on the Kubernetes
target, and onto a pre-backup hook in the restic container on the Docker target.

### Annotation summary

There are only two optional annotations, both author-time, both with safe "just back it up" defaults:

| Annotation                          | Applies to     | Meaning                                                                 |
| ----------------------------------- | -------------- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------- |
| `@stack backup-exclude`             | a volume mount | Do not include this volume in the file-level backup.                    |
| `@stack backup-command <cmd>`       | a service      | Capture `<cmd>`'s stdout into the backup (e.g. a consistent DB dump).   |
| `@stack backup-file-extension <ext>`| a service      | Name the captured `backup-command` output with this extension.         |

A stack that uses none of these is still fully backed up β€” every read-write volume, file-level.

## How Docker backup works

Like ingress, the stack tool does **not** write the backup engine's job logic by hand. It generates
configuration for an existing restic container image and lets that image do the work. The backup container
cannot be a purely *static* mix-in, because at the time its image is built it does not know which volumes
the application stack will contribute β€” and naming them statically would collide with the merge step, which
requires unique volume names across mixed-in specs.

Instead, when the `backup` master switch is enabled, the backup container is **injected at deploy time**,
precisely parallel to the way `deploy` injects `VIRTUAL_HOST_MULTIPORTS` environment variables into
matching services for ingress:

1. **Annotations to spec** β€” during `stack init`, any `@stack backup-*` annotations are parsed out of
   `composefile.yml` into a `backup` section of the output spec.

2. **Spec to backup container** β€” during `stack deploy`, the tool reads the merged deployment's volumes
   (`Spec.get_volumes()`) and:
   - mounts every non-excluded read-write volume **read-only** into the backup container
     (`- <volume>:/backup/<volume>:ro`), and
   - injects the ambiently-resolved schedule, retention, object-store, and per-service `backup-command`
     hook settings as environment / config for the container.

3. **The backup container runs restic on a schedule** β€” on each cron tick it runs any configured
   pre-backup hooks (the logical dumps) and then `restic backup` of the mounted volume tree, applying the
   retention policy.

Because every named volume on the Docker target is already realised as a bind mount under
`<deployment-dir>/data/<volume-name>/`, the set of paths to back up is fully deterministic.

## Kubernetes

On Kubernetes the work is delegated to [K8up](https://k8up.io), a restic-based backup operator. This
follows the same assume-present contract the stack tool already uses for `ingress-nginx` and `cert-manager`
(it references an `ingress_class_name="nginx"` and a `cert-manager.io/cluster-issuer` it does not install):
`stack` does not install K8up; it only emits resources that *reference* it.

- During `stack deploy`, the tool emits a K8up `Schedule` for the deployment's namespace (one namespace per
  deployment), so all of its PVCs are backed up, together with `k8up.io/backupcommand` /
  `k8up.io/file-extension` annotations derived from the `@stack backup-*` annotations.
- K8up writes a **standard restic repository** to the same object store, with the same encryption β€” so the
  repositories are interchangeable with those produced on the Docker target.

K8up itself is provisioned by the **`cluster`** tool (the batteries-included checker/fixer for required
cluster components), exactly as `cluster` is responsible for `cert-manager` and `ingress-nginx`. A
backup-enabled deployment fails recognisably β€” the same way an ingress deployment fails today when
`cert-manager` is absent β€” if K8up has not been provisioned. The readiness probe is concrete: K8up's CRDs
registered and its operator `Deployment` healthy.

> Because the deployment uses a single node (or node affinity to co-locate data), K8up's backup `Job` can
> mount the `ReadWriteOnce` PVCs alongside the running application pod. Cross-node volume access is
> explicitly out of scope.

## Restore

Restore is deliberately modelled as a distinct mode rather than a live operation, which neatly sidesteps the
problem of two consumers mounting the same volume at once. At restore time **nothing else holds the
volumes**, so even `ReadWriteOnce` PVCs can be attached by the restore job.

The flow:

1. The full stack is stopped (if running).
2. The volumes are (re)created empty.
3. A **backup-only** variant of the deployment is brought up, running a restore of the chosen snapshot:
   - **Docker:** bring up only the backup container with a restore command, restoring into the now-empty
     bind-mounted volumes.
   - **Kubernetes:** create a K8up `Restore` resource targeting the freshly-created PVCs.
4. The backup-only variant is torn down once the restore completes.
5. The full stack is started; its volumes now contain the restored data.

This is driven by a single command (see below) so the operator does not orchestrate the steps by hand.

## Command structure

Backup *configuration* is ambient (above) and backup runs automatically. The commands below are for
*operating on* an existing deployment β€” inspecting, triggering off-schedule, and restoring β€” so they live
under `stack manage --dir <dir>`, alongside `start`, `stop`, `ps`, and `logs`. They are **not** under
`stack deploy`, which only *creates* a deployment and exits.

```
stack manage --dir <dir> backup <subcommand>
```

| Command                                                        | Description                                                        |
| -------------------------------------------------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------ |
| `stack manage --dir <dir> backup now`                          | Run a backup immediately, outside the schedule.                    |
| `stack manage --dir <dir> backup status`                       | Show the result of the last run and repository health.             |
| `stack manage --dir <dir> backup list`                         | List snapshots (the available epochs) with timestamps and tags.    |
| `stack manage --dir <dir> backup restore [--snapshot <id>]`    | Orchestrate the full stop β†’ restore β†’ restart flow. Defaults to the latest snapshot; `--volume <name>` restores a single volume; `--and-start` restarts the full stack on completion. |
| `stack manage --dir <dir> backup prune`                        | Apply the retention policy (`forget` + `prune`).                   |
| `stack manage --dir <dir> backup check`                        | Verify repository integrity.                                       |

`backup` is a Click sub-group of the existing `manage` group, so it inherits `--dir` and the deployment
context. Internally each subcommand dispatches to the active target: on Docker it `exec`s restic in the
backup container (or runs a one-off restore deployment); on Kubernetes it creates/reads the corresponding
K8up resources.

> The earlier sketch of `stack deploy backup status` is intentionally **not** the chosen shape: `deploy`
> creates a deployment from specs and exits, whereas backup status/restore/list are operations *on an
> existing* deployment β€” which is precisely what `manage` is for.

## Open questions

- **Auto-enable vs explicit switch.** This design gates backup on an explicit `backup` master switch
  (profile setting / `STACK_BACKUP`) so behaviour is predictable. The most transparent alternative β€”
  enabling backup automatically whenever a destination is configured β€” is rejected as too implicit, but is
  worth revisiting.
- **Encryption-key escrow.** The concrete mechanism for persisting and surfacing an auto-generated
  `restic-password` so it cannot be silently lost (see the warning above).
- **Off-the-shelf Docker image.** Candidates that preserve the restic-repo format include `mazzolino/restic`
  and `lobaro/restic-backup-docker`. (`offen/docker-volume-backup` is feature-rich but defaults to
  tar+GPG, which would break cross-target compatibility.)
- **Monitoring.** Surfacing backup success/failure (a healthcheck or status that `backup status` can read)
  so that a silently failing backup is not mistaken for a working one.
- **New repository.** The Docker backup container lives in its own repo (e.g. `bozemanpass/backup-stack`),
  mirroring `bozemanpass/docker-ingress-stack`.
The file /home/david/projects/bpi/stack/docs/backup.md has been updated successfully. (file state is current in your context β€” no need to Read it back)
Thinking

Reworked docs/backup.md around your transparency goal. The headline change: backup is now ambient by default, not annotation-driven.

Direct answer to your question: yes β€” we can back up all volumes with zero deployer input, and I've made that the design. Annotations are demoted to optional author-time refinements only.

What changed:

  1. New "Design goal" section up front β€” states the contract: the person deploying provides nothing. What-to-back-up is derived from the deployment; where/credentials/schedule come from the environment.

  2. Volume selection is automatic β€” all read-write named volumes, derived from Spec.get_volumes(). No annotation needed. The only optional one, backup-exclude, is for caches/scratch and is an author decision in the component, never the deployer's.

  3. Configuration is sourced ambiently β€” I anchored this on the real mechanism I found: get_config_setting() already resolves env β†’ profile β†’ default. So stack config set backup-s3-bucket … once per profile, and every deployment inherits it. Documented the exact setting keys.

  4. Two honest caveats I refused to hand-wave:

  5. The encryption key can't be ephemeral. I gave this a prominent warning box: if restic-password lives only in a lost environment, the backups are permanently unrecoverable. It must be explicitly set or escrowed. This is the one thing "source everything from the environment" gets dangerously wrong if done naively.
  6. Database consistency. File-level copy of a live DB can be torn. The remedy is the single remaining meaningful annotation, @stack backup-command pg_dump … β€” but I stressed it's written once by the component author, so the deployer still supplies nothing.

  7. Enabling is one switch β€” a backup master setting (profile / STACK_BACKUP), default off. Turn it on once; nothing further per-stack. On Docker it auto-injects the backup container at deploy; on k8s it emits the K8up Schedule.

So the annotation scheme shrank from a required per-volume system to two optional author-time hints, neither of which the deployer ever touches β€” and a stack with no annotations at all is still fully backed up.

The one design decision I left open for you (flagged in "Open questions"): I gated backup on an explicit master switch rather than auto-enabling it the moment a destination is configured. Explicit is more predictable; fully-implicit is marginally more transparent but can surprise. I'd lean explicit, but it's your call.

Want me to now sketch the deploy-time injection pass β€” the actual get_volumes() β†’ backup-container read-only mounts code β€” as the first concrete implementation step, or leave it at the design doc for now?

Ok yes explicit enabling is fine. We can revisit this kind of detail after acquiring some operational experience. Please proceed.

Thinking

I'll ground the sketch in how the ingress injection actually works in code, then mirror it. Let me find the real VIRTUAL_HOST_MULTIPORTS injection path.

$ Bash
Find ingress injection in deploy code
grep -rn "VIRTUAL_HOST\|http_proxy\|http-proxy\|LETSENCRYPT" src/stack/deploy/*.py | grep -vi "def get_http_proxy\|_http_proxy\b" | head -40
src/stack/deploy/explain.py:64:    use_tls = http_proxy_info and not is_kind
src/stack/deploy/deployment_create.py:269:    http_proxy_fqdn,
src/stack/deploy/deployment_create.py:270:    http_proxy_clusterissuer,
src/stack/deploy/deployment_create.py:271:    http_proxy_targets,
src/stack/deploy/deployment_create.py:285:        if http_proxy_targets:
src/stack/deploy/deployment_create.py:287:            for target in http_proxy_targets:
src/stack/deploy/deployment_create.py:294:            http_proxy = {
src/stack/deploy/deployment_create.py:295:                constants.host_name_key: http_proxy_fqdn,
src/stack/deploy/deployment_create.py:296:                constants.cluster_issuer_key: http_proxy_clusterissuer,
src/stack/deploy/deployment_create.py:301:            spec_file_content[constants.network_key].update({constants.http_proxy_key: [http_proxy]})
src/stack/deploy/deployment_create.py:307:    if http_proxy_targets:
src/stack/deploy/deployment_create.py:309:        for target in http_proxy_targets:
src/stack/deploy/deployment_create.py:316:        http_proxy = {
src/stack/deploy/deployment_create.py:317:            constants.host_name_key: http_proxy_fqdn,
src/stack/deploy/deployment_create.py:320:        if http_proxy_clusterissuer and deployer_type in ["k8s", "k8s-kind"]:
src/stack/deploy/deployment_create.py:321:            http_proxy[constants.cluster_issuer_key] = http_proxy_clusterissuer
src/stack/deploy/deployment_create.py:326:        spec_file_content[constants.network_key].update({constants.http_proxy_key: [http_proxy]})
src/stack/deploy/deployment_create.py:551:                for pxy in http_proxy_config:
src/stack/deploy/deployment_create.py:571:                        add_env_var("VIRTUAL_HOST_MULTIPORTS", json.dumps(vhost), svc_env)
src/stack/deploy/deployment_create.py:573:                            add_env_var("LETSENCRYPT_HOST", host, svc_env)
src/stack/deploy/stack.py:203:        http_proxy_targets = []
src/stack/deploy/stack.py:216:                                    if constants.stack_annotation_marker in comment and constants.http_proxy_key in comment:
src/stack/deploy/stack.py:218:                                        parts = parts[parts.index(constants.http_proxy_key) + 1 :]
src/stack/deploy/stack.py:225:                                        http_proxy_targets.append({"service": svc_name, "port": port, "path": path})
src/stack/deploy/stack.py:226:        return http_proxy_targets
src/stack/deploy/stack.py:312:                return s.get(constants.http_proxy_prefix_key, None)
src/stack/deploy/spec.py:141:        return self.obj.get(constants.network_key, {}).get(constants.http_proxy_key, [])
src/stack/deploy/spec.py:145:            if constants.http_proxy_key in self.obj[constants.network_key]:
src/stack/deploy/spec.py:146:                del self.obj[constants.network_key][constants.http_proxy_key]
src/stack/deploy/spec.py:151:        self.obj[constants.network_key][constants.http_proxy_key] = val
$ Bash
Find compose generation/injection points
grep -rn "VIRTUAL_HOST\|def .*proxy\|inject\|environment\|composefile\|compose_file\|parsed_pod\|fixup_pod" src/stack/deploy/deployment_create.py | head -40
src/stack/deploy/deployment_create.py:77:def _fixup_pod_file(pod, spec, compose_dir):
src/stack/deploy/deployment_create.py:175:def _find_extra_config_dirs(parsed_pod_file, pod):
src/stack/deploy/deployment_create.py:177:    services = parsed_pod_file["services"]
src/stack/deploy/deployment_create.py:522:        parsed_pod_file = parsed_spec.load_pod_file(pod)
src/stack/deploy/deployment_create.py:523:        extra_config_dirs = _find_extra_config_dirs(parsed_pod_file, pod)
src/stack/deploy/deployment_create.py:527:        _fixup_pod_file(parsed_pod_file, parsed_spec, destination_compose_dir)
src/stack/deploy/deployment_create.py:531:            services = parsed_pod_file["services"]
src/stack/deploy/deployment_create.py:552:                    svc_env = service_info.get("environment", {})
src/stack/deploy/deployment_create.py:571:                        add_env_var("VIRTUAL_HOST_MULTIPORTS", json.dumps(vhost), svc_env)
src/stack/deploy/deployment_create.py:574:                        service_info["environment"] = svc_env
src/stack/deploy/deployment_create.py:576:        with open(destination_compose_dir.joinpath(f"{constants.compose_file_prefix}-%s.yml" % pod), "w") as output_file:
src/stack/deploy/deployment_create.py:577:            yaml.dump(parsed_pod_file, output_file)
Thinking
βš™ Read
{
  "file_path": "/home/david/projects/bpi/stack/src/stack/deploy/deployment_create.py",
  "offset": 505,
  "limit": 78
}
505	        parsed_spec.merge_stacks().dump(deployment_dir_path.joinpath(constants.stack_file_name))
506	    else:
507	        parsed_spec.load_stack().dump(deployment_dir_path.joinpath(constants.stack_file_name))
508	
509	    # Copy any config variables from the spec file into an env file suitable for compose
510	    _write_config_file(parsed_spec, deployment_dir_path.joinpath(constants.config_file_name))
511	
512	    # Copy any k8s config file into the deployment dir
513	    if deployment_type == "k8s":
514	        _write_kube_config_file(
515	            Path(parsed_spec.get_kube_config()),
516	            deployment_dir_path.joinpath(constants.kube_config_filename),
517	        )
518	
519	    yaml = get_yaml()
520	    pods = parsed_spec.get_pod_list()
521	    for pod in pods:
522	        parsed_pod_file = parsed_spec.load_pod_file(pod)
523	        extra_config_dirs = _find_extra_config_dirs(parsed_pod_file, pod)
524	        destination_pod_dir = destination_pods_dir.joinpath(pod)
525	        os.mkdir(destination_pod_dir)
526	        log_debug(f"extra config dirs: {extra_config_dirs}")
527	        _fixup_pod_file(parsed_pod_file, parsed_spec, destination_compose_dir)
528	
529	        if deployment_type == "compose":
530	            # Inject the shared config.env file into the compose file.  We don't need to do this for k8s.
531	            services = parsed_pod_file["services"]
532	            for service_name in services:
533	                service_info = services[service_name]
534	                image_name = service_info["image"]
535	                if image_name.endswith(":stack"):
536	                    service_info["image"] = image_name[:-5] + deployment_command_context.cluster_context.cluster
537	
538	                shared_cfg_file = os.path.join(
539	                    "../" * len(destination_compose_dir.relative_to(deployment_dir_path).parts), constants.config_file_name
540	                )
541	                if "env_file" in service_info:
542	                    env_files = service_info["env_file"]
543	                    if isinstance(env_files, list):
544	                        service_info["env_file"] = [shared_cfg_file, *env_files]
545	                    else:
546	                        service_info["env_file"] = [shared_cfg_file, env_files]
547	                else:
548	                    service_info["env_file"] = [shared_cfg_file]
549	
550	                http_proxy_config = parsed_spec.get_http_proxy()
551	                for pxy in http_proxy_config:
552	                    svc_env = service_info.get("environment", {})
553	                    host = pxy[constants.host_name_key]
554	                    vhost = {host: {}}
555	                    for r in pxy[constants.routes_key]:
556	                        pxy_svc, pxy_port = r[constants.proxy_to_key].split(":", 1)
557	                        if pxy_svc == service_name:
558	                            path = "/" + r[constants.path_key].strip("/")
559	                            path_rule = path
560	                            dest = "/"
561	                            if path_rule != "/":
562	                                path_rule = f"~ ^{path_rule}(?:/(.*))?$"
563	                                dest = "/$1"
564	
565	                            vhost[host][path_rule] = {
566	                                "dest": dest,
567	                                "port": pxy_port,
568	                            }
569	
570	                    if vhost[host]:
571	                        add_env_var("VIRTUAL_HOST_MULTIPORTS", json.dumps(vhost), svc_env)
572	                        if "localhost" != host and "." in host:
573	                            add_env_var("LETSENCRYPT_HOST", host, svc_env)
574	                        service_info["environment"] = svc_env
575	
576	        with open(destination_compose_dir.joinpath(f"{constants.compose_file_prefix}-%s.yml" % pod), "w") as output_file:
577	            yaml.dump(parsed_pod_file, output_file)
578	
579	        parsed_stack = parsed_spec.stack_for_pod(pod) if isinstance(parsed_spec, MergedSpec) else parsed_spec.load_stack()
580	
581	        # Copy the config files for the pod, if any
582	        config_dirs = {pod}
βš™ Read
{
  "file_path": "/home/david/projects/bpi/stack/src/stack/deploy/stack.py",
  "offset": 200,
  "limit": 28
}
200	                    prefix = "/" + prefix
201	                prefix = prefix.rstrip("/")
202	
203	        http_proxy_targets = []
204	        pods = self.get_pod_list()
205	        for pod in pods:
206	            parsed_pod_file = self.load_pod_file(pod)
207	            if constants.services_key in parsed_pod_file:
208	                for svc_name, svc in parsed_pod_file[constants.services_key].items():
209	                    if constants.ports_key in svc:
210	                        ports_section = svc[constants.ports_key]
211	                        for i, port in enumerate(ports_section):
212	                            port = str(port).split(":")[-1]
213	                            if len(ports_section.ca.items) > 0:
214	                                if i in ports_section.ca.items:
215	                                    comment = ports_section.ca.items[i][0].value.strip()
216	                                    if constants.stack_annotation_marker in comment and constants.http_proxy_key in comment:
217	                                        parts = comment.split()
218	                                        parts = parts[parts.index(constants.http_proxy_key) + 1 :]
219	                                        path = ""
220	                                        if len(parts) >= 1:
221	                                            path = parts[0]
222	                                        if prefix:
223	                                            path = f"{prefix}/{path.strip('/')}"
224	                                        path = "/" + path.strip("/")
225	                                        http_proxy_targets.append({"service": svc_name, "port": port, "path": path})
226	        return http_proxy_targets
227	
Thinking

I now have the exact injection pattern. The ingress path is: stack.py:203 parses @stack annotations into targets β†’ stored in the spec β†’ deployment_create.py:550-574 injects env vars into the generated compose at deploy time. I'll mirror that precisely.

Since this feature is still pre-implementation (no backup-stack image exists yet, the master switch isn't plumbed through the CLI, and there's nothing to test against), committing live code into main would be premature. The right "first concrete step" is a code-grounded implementation sketch pinned to the real functions β€” executable as a plan, mirroring ingress exactly. Writing it as a companion doc.

πŸ“ Write backup-implementation.md
/home/david/projects/bpi/stack/docs/backup-implementation.md
# Backup β€” implementation sketch

> **Status: design sketch β€” not yet implemented.** Companion to [backup.md](./backup.md). This pins the
> design down to concrete functions and insertion points in the existing code, mirroring how ingress is
> implemented, so the work can be reviewed before it is written. Code below is illustrative, not final.

## Scope of this sketch

This covers the **deploy-time injection pass** (the first concrete step) and the two things it depends on:

1. parsing the `@stack backup-*` annotations into the spec (mirrors `Stack.get_http_proxy_targets`);
2. an accessor for that spec section (mirrors `Spec.get_http_proxy`);
3. injecting a backup service into the generated deployment at deploy time (mirrors the
   `VIRTUAL_HOST_MULTIPORTS` injection).

**Out of scope here** (later steps): the `bozemanpass/backup-stack` container image, the
`stack manage … backup` subcommands, and the Kubernetes K8up-resource emission. Those are tracked in
[backup.md](./backup.md).

## The ingress pattern we are mirroring

For reference, ingress works in three touch-points, all of which have a backup analogue:

| Ingress                                                   | Backup analogue                                            |
| --------------------------------------------------------- | --------------------------------------------------------- |
| `Stack.get_http_proxy_targets()` parses port annotations (`stack.py:203`) | `Stack.get_backup_targets()` parses volume/service annotations |
| targets written into `network.http-proxy` spec section    | targets written into a `backup` spec section              |
| `Spec.get_http_proxy()` accessor (`spec.py:140`)          | `Spec.get_backup()` accessor                              |
| inject `VIRTUAL_HOST_MULTIPORTS` env at deploy (`deployment_create.py:550`) | inject a `backup` service + `:ro` mounts at deploy |

## 1. Parse annotations β€” `deploy/stack.py`

Add a method alongside `get_http_proxy_targets` (`stack.py:203`). Unlike ingress, backup annotations attach
to two different places β€” a **volume mount line** (`backup-exclude`) and a **service** (`backup-command`,
`backup-file-extension`). Both are read from `ruamel`'s comment attributes (`.ca`), exactly as the ingress
parser reads port-line comments.

```python
# constants.py (new)
backup_key = "backup"
backup_exclude_annotation = "backup-exclude"
backup_command_annotation = "backup-command"
backup_file_extension_annotation = "backup-file-extension"

# deploy/stack.py β€” new method on Stack
def get_backup_targets(self):
    """Parse @stack backup-* annotations from the stack's composefiles.

    Returns {"exclude": [volume_name, ...],
             "commands": {service_name: {"command": str, "file_extension": str}}}
    """
    exclude = []
    commands = {}
    for pod in self.get_pod_list():
        parsed_pod_file = self.load_pod_file(pod)
        for svc_name, svc in parsed_pod_file.get(constants.services_key, {}).items():
            # Service-level annotations (backup-command / backup-file-extension) live in the
            # comment block attached to the service mapping.
            for ann in _stack_annotations_for(svc):       # small helper over svc.ca
                if constants.backup_command_annotation in ann:
                    commands.setdefault(svc_name, {})["command"] = _annotation_value(ann)
                elif constants.backup_file_extension_annotation in ann:
                    commands.setdefault(svc_name, {})["file_extension"] = _annotation_value(ann)

            # Volume-level annotation (backup-exclude) lives on the mount line, like ports do.
            volumes_section = svc.get(constants.volumes_key, [])
            for i, mount in enumerate(volumes_section):
                comment = _line_comment(volumes_section, i)   # mirrors ports_section.ca.items[i]
                if comment and constants.stack_annotation_marker in comment \
                        and constants.backup_exclude_annotation in comment:
                    exclude.append(str(mount).split(":")[0])
    return {"exclude": exclude, "commands": commands}
```

`_line_comment()` is the same `ports_section.ca.items[i][0].value` access used at `stack.py:213-215`,
factored out so it can be reused for the volumes list.

## 2. Spec section + accessor β€” `deploy/spec.py`

The parsed targets are written into a top-level `backup` section of the spec during `stack init` (alongside
where `http-proxy` targets are written, `deployment_create.py:285-326`). Add the read accessor next to
`get_http_proxy` (`spec.py:140`):

```python
# deploy/spec.py
def get_backup(self):
    return self.obj.get(constants.backup_key, {})
```

Because `backup` is a plain dict it merges additively across mixed-in specs with no special handling, like
the other spec sections.

## 3. Inject the backup service at deploy time β€” `deploy/deployment_create.py`

This is the core of the pass. After the per-pod compose files are written (the loop ending at
`deployment_create.py:577`), and only for the `compose` target with the master switch enabled, write **one
synthetic compose file** containing the backup service.

The backup service mounts the deployment's data **read-only**. On Docker every named volume is already a
bind mount under `<deployment-dir>/data/<volume-name>/` (`_fixup_pod_file`, line 77), so the backup service
can bind-mount those host paths directly β€” sidestepping cross-compose-file named-volume declaration
entirely.

```python
# deploy/deployment_create.py β€” after the `for pod in pods:` loop (~line 577)

from stack.config.util import get_config_setting

def _maybe_write_backup_compose(parsed_spec, deployment_type, deployment_dir_path, destination_compose_dir):
    if deployment_type != "compose":
        return                                    # k8s path emits K8up resources instead (separate step)
    if not get_config_setting("backup", False):   # explicit master switch (env β†’ profile β†’ default false)
        return

    backup_cfg = parsed_spec.get_backup()
    exclude = set(backup_cfg.get("exclude", []))

    # All read-write named volumes, minus author-excluded ones.
    volumes = parsed_spec.get_volumes()           # {name: host_path_or_None}
    backed_up = [v for v in volumes if v not in exclude]

    mounts = [f"../../data/{v}:/backup/{v}:ro" for v in backed_up]   # relative to the compose dir

    # Per-service consistent-dump hooks (run inside the backup container, reaching services by name
    # over the shared compose network).
    pre_hooks = []
    for svc, c in backup_cfg.get("commands", {}).items():
        ext = c.get("file_extension", "dump")
        pre_hooks.append(f"{svc}:{c['command']}:{ext}")   # parsed by the backup image entrypoint

    backup_service = {
        "image": f"bozemanpass/backup:{deployment_command_context.cluster_context.cluster}",
        "restart": "always",
        "volumes": mounts,
        "env_file": [relative_path_to(constants.config_file_name)],   # brings in S3 creds + restic-password
        "environment": {
            "BACKUP_DEST": get_config_setting("backup-s3-bucket"),
            "BACKUP_S3_ENDPOINT": get_config_setting("backup-s3-endpoint"),
            "BACKUP_SCHEDULE": get_config_setting("backup-schedule", "0 3 * * *"),
            "BACKUP_RETENTION": get_config_setting(
                "backup-retention", "--keep-daily 7 --keep-weekly 4 --keep-monthly 6"),
            "BACKUP_PRE_HOOKS": ";".join(pre_hooks),
        },
    }

    doc = {"services": {"backup": backup_service}}
    out = destination_compose_dir.joinpath(f"{constants.compose_file_prefix}-backup.yml")
    with open(out, "w") as f:
        get_yaml().dump(doc, f)
```

Call it once, right after the pod loop:

```python
    _maybe_write_backup_compose(parsed_spec, deployment_type, deployment_dir_path, destination_compose_dir)
```

Notes:

- **One mount per volume, `:ro`.** This matches the doc and lets restic see a clean per-volume tree. A
  simpler variant is a single `../../data:/backup:ro` mount with restic `--exclude` patterns; either works.
- **`restic-password` and the S3 credentials** arrive via the shared `config.env` (`env_file`), which is
  how `get_config_setting` values already reach containers β€” no new secret-plumbing path is introduced.
- The backup service joins the deployment's default network automatically, so `backup-command` hooks such
  as `pg_dump -h db …` resolve the `db` service by name.
- The injected service appears in `stack manage … ps` like any other container, which is what the
  forthcoming `backup` subcommands will `exec` into.

## What this deliberately does *not* do yet

- It does not start a restic engine β€” the `bozemanpass/backup` image (its entrypoint, cron loop, hook
  runner, and restore command) is the next step and lives in its own repo.
- It does not emit anything on the Kubernetes target; that path generates a K8up `Schedule` + annotations
  and is a sibling to this function.
- It does not add the `stack manage … backup` subcommands.

These are intentionally separable: this pass produces a deployment that *declares* its backup intent in a
single, inspectable compose file, which is the foundation the remaining pieces build on.
File created successfully at: /home/david/projects/bpi/stack/docs/backup-implementation.md (file state is current in your context β€” no need to Read it back)
Thinking

Done. Two artifacts now in docs/:

  • docs/backup.md β€” the design (engine, ambient config, transparency model, restore, CLI shape).
  • docs/backup-implementation.md β€” the implementation sketch you asked me to proceed with.

The sketch pins the deploy-time injection pass to the real ingress machinery I traced, so it's executable as a plan rather than hand-waving:

  1. Parse β€” Stack.get_backup_targets() next to get_http_proxy_targets() (stack.py:203), reading @stack backup-* from ruamel comment attributes the same way the port parser does.
  2. Accessor β€” Spec.get_backup() next to get_http_proxy() (spec.py:140); merges additively across mixed-in specs for free.
  3. Inject β€” _maybe_write_backup_compose() called after the pod-write loop (deployment_create.py:577), gated on the explicit backup master switch via get_config_setting, emitting one synthetic composefile-backup.yml.

Two design decisions I made in the sketch worth your eye:

  • Direct host bind-mounts, not named volumes. Since _fixup_pod_file (line 77) already lands every volume at <deployment-dir>/data/<vol>/, the backup service bind-mounts those paths :ro directly. This sidesteps the cross-compose-file named-volume declaration problem entirely β€” cleaner than trying to re-share the named volumes.
  • Secrets reuse the existing path. restic-password and S3 creds ride in via the shared config.env (env_file), which is already how get_config_setting values reach containers β€” so no new secret-plumbing is invented, and the encryption-key warning from the design doc is the only special handling.

The sketch is explicit about what it doesn't do yet (the bozemanpass/backup image, the manage … backup subcommands, K8up emission) and why those are cleanly separable β€” this pass just produces a deployment that declares its backup intent in one inspectable file.

Natural next step when you want to continue: stand up the backup-stack repo (the restic container β€” entrypoint, cron loop, hook runner, restore command), since the injection pass references bozemanpass/backup: and nothing can actually run until that image exists. Want me to scaffold that repo's layout next, or pause here for you to review the two docs first?

Thanks. I made an empty repository for backup-stack and cloned it at ../backup-stack

Thinking

Let me look at the empty repo and study how buildable-container stacks are structured in this ecosystem (the ingress stack uses upstream images, but backup needs a custom restic image, so I need the build convention).

$ Bash
Inspect empty repo and stack container model
echo "=== backup-stack contents ===" && ls -la /home/david/projects/bpi/backup-stack/ 2>/dev/null && echo "--- git remote ---" && git -C /home/david/projects/bpi/backup-stack remote -v 2>/dev/null; echo; echo "=== how stacks declare buildable containers (search data/ + build) ===" && grep -rn "containers\|repos\|build" src/stack/deploy/stack.py | head -20
βš™ Agent
Find buildable-container stack convention
{
  "subagent_type": "Explore",
  "prompt": "I'm in the BPI Stack codebase at /home/david/projects/bpi/stack (a Python CLI that builds and deploys container \"stacks\"). I need to understand the on-disk convention for a stack repository that BUILDS ITS OWN custom container image (as opposed to referencing an upstream image like nginx).\n\nBackground: a \"stack\" repo contains `stacks/<name>/stack.yml` (declares name/description/pods) and `<pod>/composefile.yml` (the compose services). I need to know how a stack additionally declares a container image that must be BUILT from a Dockerfile, and how `stack build containers` / `stack prepare` find and build it.\n\nPlease investigate and report concisely, with file paths + line numbers and short quoted snippets:\n\n1. How does a stack.yml (or composefile.yml) declare that it has containers to build? Look in src/stack/deploy/stack.py for how it reads a \"containers\" list, and src/stack/build/ (build_containers.py, build_util.py) for how containers are discovered and built.\n\n2. What is the directory/file convention for a buildable container? Is there a `container-build` dir, a `build.sh`, a Dockerfile location convention? Look in src/stack/data/ for any embedded container definitions or templates, and search the repo for example Dockerfiles or \"build.sh\" scripts.\n\n3. How does the build system map a container NAME (e.g. \"bozemanpass/backup\") to its build directory and Dockerfile? Is there a naming convention (e.g. cloud/name or a directory under a known path)?\n\n4. Is there any existing example IN THIS REPO of a stack that builds a custom container (look under src/stack/data/, and any test fixtures under tests/)? Show its layout.\n\n5. How does the `image:` field in a composefile relate to a built image β€” what tag/suffix convention is used (I saw \":stack\" suffixes being rewritten to a cluster name in deployment_create.py)? Explain the \":stack\" tag convention.\n\nReport findings only β€” do not write or modify any files."
}
=== backup-stack contents ===
total 16
drwxr-xr-x 3 david david 4096 Jun 29 21:05 .
drwxr-xr-x 7 david david 4096 Jun 29 21:04 ..
drwxr-xr-x 8 david david 4096 Jun 29 21:05 .git
-rw-r--r-- 1 david david   79 Jun 29 21:05 README.md
--- git remote ---
origin	git@github.com:bozemanpass/backup-stack.git (fetch)
origin	git@github.com:bozemanpass/backup-stack.git (push)

=== how stacks declare buildable containers (search data/ + build) ===
src/stack/deploy/stack.py:24:import stack.repos.repo_util as repo_util
src/stack/deploy/stack.py:72:                    if "repository" not in pod:
src/stack/deploy/stack.py:73:                        pod["repository"] = self.get_repo_ref()
src/stack/deploy/stack.py:294:                    pod.get("repository", self.get_repo_ref()).split("@")[0],
src/stack/deploy/stack.py:355:                        pod.get("repository", stack.get_repo_ref()).split("@")[0],
src/stack/deploy/stack.py:375:                    pod.get("repository", parsed_stack.get_repo_ref()).split("@")[0],
[
  {
    "type": "text",
    "text": "Async agent launched successfully.\nagentId: a36bb9bcdab8719f9 (internal ID - do not mention to user. Use SendMessage with to: 'a36bb9bcdab8719f9', summary: '<5-10 word recap>' to continue this agent.)\nThe agent is working in the background. You will be notified automatically when it completes.\nDo not duplicate this agent's work β€” avoid working with the same files or topics it is using.\noutput_file: /tmp/claude-1000/-home-david-projects-bpi-stack/83ff7993-2200-4857-b374-743227b368dd/tasks/a36bb9bcdab8719f9.output\nDo NOT Read or tail this file via the shell tool β€” it is the full subagent JSONL transcript and reading it will overflow your context. If the user asks for progress, say the agent is still running; you'll get a completion notification."
  }
]
Thinking
$ Bash
Inspect README and embedded container build examples
cat /home/david/projects/bpi/backup-stack/README.md; echo "=== embedded data stacks with Dockerfiles ==="; find src/stack/data -iname "Dockerfile*" -o -iname "build.sh" 2>/dev/null | head; echo "=== any container-build dirs ==="; find src/stack/data -type d -name "*container*" 2>/dev/null | head; echo "=== stack.yml files in data ==="; find src/stack/data -name "stack.yml" | head
# backup-stack
Backup components for the "stack" tool's docker deployment mode
=== embedded data stacks with Dockerfiles ===
src/stack/data/container-build/bozemanpass-webapp-base/build.sh
src/stack/data/container-build/bozemanpass-nextjs-base/build.sh
=== any container-build dirs ===
src/stack/data/container-build
=== stack.yml files in data ===
src/stack/data/stacks/webapp-template/stack.yml
Thinking
$ Bash
Examine container-build and stack conventions
echo "=== container-build dir structure ==="; ls -la src/stack/data/container-build/bozemanpass-webapp-base/; echo "--- build.sh ---"; cat src/stack/data/container-build/bozemanpass-webapp-base/build.sh; echo; echo "=== webapp-template stack.yml ==="; cat src/stack/data/stacks/webapp-template/stack.yml; echo "=== webapp-template tree ==="; find src/stack/data/stacks/webapp-template -type f
=== container-build dir structure ===
total 24
drwxr-xr-x 3 david david 4096 Oct 28  2025 .
drwxr-xr-x 4 david david 4096 Apr  7 17:57 ..
-rw-r--r-- 1 david david 2440 Oct 28  2025 Containerfile
-rw-r--r-- 1 david david  265 Oct 28  2025 Containerfile.webapp
-rwxr-xr-x 1 david david 1092 Oct 28  2025 build.sh
drwxr-xr-x 2 david david 4096 Oct 28  2025 scripts
--- build.sh ---
#!/usr/bin/env bash
# Build bozemanpass/webapp-base

source ${STACK_CONTAINER_BASE_DIR}/build-base.sh

# See: https://stackoverflow.com/a/246128/1701505
SCRIPT_DIR=$( cd -- "$( dirname -- "${BASH_SOURCE[0]}" )" &> /dev/null && pwd )

STACK_CONTAINER_BUILD_WORK_DIR=${STACK_CONTAINER_BUILD_WORK_DIR:-$SCRIPT_DIR}
STACK_CONTAINER_BUILD_CONTAINERFILE=${STACK_CONTAINER_BUILD_CONTAINERFILE:-$SCRIPT_DIR/Containerfile}
STACK_CONTAINER_BUILD_TAG=${STACK_CONTAINER_BUILD_TAG:-bozemanpass/webapp-base:stack}

docker build -t $STACK_CONTAINER_BUILD_TAG ${build_command_args} -f $STACK_CONTAINER_BUILD_CONTAINERFILE $STACK_CONTAINER_BUILD_WORK_DIR
rc=$?

if [ $rc -ne 0 ]; then
  echo "BUILD FAILED" 1>&2
  exit $rc
fi

if [ "$STACK_CONTAINER_BUILD_TAG" != "bozemanpass/webapp-base:stack" ]; then
  cat <<EOF

#################################################################

Built host container for $STACK_CONTAINER_BUILD_WORK_DIR with tag:

    $STACK_CONTAINER_BUILD_TAG

To test locally run:

    stack webapp run --image $STACK_CONTAINER_BUILD_TAG --config-file /path/to/environment.env

EOF
fi

=== webapp-template stack.yml ===
version: "1.0"
name: internal-stack-webapp-template
description: "webapp template stack"
containers:
  - bozemanpass/webapp-template-container
pods:
  - webapp-template
=== webapp-template tree ===
src/stack/data/stacks/webapp-template/stack.yml
src/stack/data/stacks/webapp-template/README.md
Thinking

The convention is clear: stack.yml lists containers:, and each builds from container-build/<name-with-dashes>/ via a build.sh + Containerfile, tagged bozemanpass/<name>:stack. Let me see the Containerfile style and the build-base it sources while the agent confirms how external repos expose their container-build dirs.

βš™ Read
{
  "file_path": "/home/david/projects/bpi/stack/src/stack/data/container-build/bozemanpass-webapp-base/Containerfile"
}
1	# Originally from: https://github.com/devcontainers/images/blob/main/src/javascript-node/.devcontainer/Dockerfile
2	# [Choice] Node.js version (use -bullseye variants on local arm64/Apple Silicon): 18, 16, 14, 18-bullseye, 16-bullseye, 14-bullseye, 18-buster, 16-buster, 14-buster
3	ARG VARIANT=20-bullseye-slim
4	FROM node:${VARIANT}
5	
6	ARG USERNAME=node
7	ARG NPM_GLOBAL=/usr/local/share/npm-global
8	
9	# Add NPM global to PATH.
10	ENV PATH=${NPM_GLOBAL}/bin:${PATH}
11	# Prevents npm from printing version warnings
12	ENV NPM_CONFIG_UPDATE_NOTIFIER=false
13	
14	RUN \
15	    # Configure global npm install location, use group to adapt to UID/GID changes
16	    if ! cat /etc/group | grep -e "^npm:" > /dev/null 2>&1; then groupadd -r npm; fi \
17	    && usermod -a -G npm ${USERNAME} \
18	    && umask 0002 \
19	    && mkdir -p ${NPM_GLOBAL} \
20	    && touch /usr/local/etc/npmrc \
21	    && chown ${USERNAME}:npm ${NPM_GLOBAL} /usr/local/etc/npmrc \
22	    && chmod g+s ${NPM_GLOBAL} \
23	    && npm config -g set prefix ${NPM_GLOBAL} \
24	    && su ${USERNAME} -c "npm config -g set prefix ${NPM_GLOBAL}" \
25	    # Install eslint
26	    && su ${USERNAME} -c "umask 0002 && npm install -g eslint" \
27	    # Install semver
28	    && su ${USERNAME} -c "umask 0002 && npm install -g semver" \
29	    # Install pnpm
30	    && su ${USERNAME} -c "umask 0002 && npm install -g pnpm" \
31	    # Install bun
32	    && su ${USERNAME} -c "umask 0002 && npm install -g bun@1.1.x" \
33	    && npm cache clean --force > /dev/null 2>&1
34	
35	# [Optional] Uncomment this section to install additional OS packages.
36	RUN apt-get update && export DEBIAN_FRONTEND=noninteractive \
37	    && apt-get -y install --no-install-recommends jq gettext-base git
38	
39	# [Optional] Uncomment if you want to install an additional version of node using nvm
40	# ARG EXTRA_NODE_VERSION=10
41	# RUN su node -c "source /usr/local/share/nvm/nvm.sh && nvm install ${EXTRA_NODE_VERSION}"
42	
43	# We do this to get a yq binary from the published container, for the correct architecture we're building here
44	COPY --from=docker.io/mikefarah/yq:latest /usr/bin/yq /usr/local/bin/yq
45	
46	COPY scripts /scripts
47	
48	# [Optional] Uncomment if you want to install more global node modules
49	# RUN su node -c "npm install -g <your-package-list-here>"
50	
51	RUN mkdir -p /config
52	
53	# Install simple web server for now (use nginx perhaps later)
54	RUN yarn global add http-server
55	
56	# Expose port for http
57	EXPOSE 80
58	
59	# Default command sleeps forever so docker doesn't kill it
60	CMD ["/scripts/start-serving-app.sh"]
61	
Thinking

The build convention is taking shape. Let me wait for the research agent to confirm how an external fetched repo exposes its container-build dir to stack build/prepare, since that determines the exact layout and build.sh contract.

$ Bash
Find build-base and container-build dir resolution
cat src/stack/data/container-build/bozemanpass-webapp-base/build.sh > /dev/null; echo "=== where is build-base.sh and STACK_CONTAINER_BASE_DIR set? ==="; grep -rn "STACK_CONTAINER_BASE_DIR\|build-base.sh\|container-build\|CONTAINER_BUILD" src/stack/build/*.py src/stack/constants.py | head -30
=== where is build-base.sh and STACK_CONTAINER_BASE_DIR set? ===
src/stack/build/build_webapp.py:51:    container_build_dir = Path(__file__).absolute().parent.parent.joinpath("data", "container-build")
src/stack/build/build_webapp.py:81:    container_build_env["STACK_CONTAINER_BUILD_WORK_DIR"] = os.path.abspath(source_repo)
src/stack/build/build_webapp.py:82:    container_build_env["STACK_CONTAINER_BUILD_CONTAINERFILE"] = os.path.join(container_build_dir,
src/stack/build/build_webapp.py:89:    container_build_env["STACK_CONTAINER_BUILD_TAG"] = tag
src/stack/build/build_containers.py:65:        "STACK_CONTAINER_BASE_DIR": default_container_base_dir,
src/stack/build/build_containers.py:212:        default_container_base_dir = Path(__file__).absolute().parent.parent.joinpath("data", "container-build")
Thinking
βš™ Read
{
  "file_path": "/home/david/projects/bpi/stack/src/stack/build/build_containers.py",
  "offset": 100,
  "limit": 120
}
100	    if stack.name != "None" and stack_is_external(stack):
101	        log_debug(f"Determined stack: {stack.name} is external")
102	        # DBDB What is this code below doing?
103	        # "build" is pulled from the container description yaml
104	        # Presumably it means "the relative name of the build file"
105	        if building_container.build:
106	            # If the build script filename was provided, we use that
107	            build_script_filename = Path(building_container.file_path).parent.joinpath(building_container.build)
108	            build_dir = build_script_filename.parent
109	            build_envs["STACK_BUILD_DIR"] = build_dir
110	        else:
111	            # If the build script filename is not explicitly provided, we try to infer it
112	            # DBDB this code seems not to work because we use the bare stack name rather than a directory
113	            # We go looking for a "containers" directory in the root of the container's repo.
114	            container_build_script_dir = fs_path_for_repo(building_container.ref).joinpath(constants.stack_files_directory_name).joinpath(constants.containers_directory_name)
115	            log_debug(f"Looking for build script in this directory: {container_build_script_dir}")
116	            if os.path.exists(container_build_script_dir):
117	                temp_build_dir = container_build_script_dir.joinpath(building_container.name.replace("/", "-"))
118	                temp_build_script_filename = temp_build_dir.joinpath("build.sh")
119	                # Now check if the container exists in the external stack.
120	                log_debug(f"Looking for build script at: {temp_build_script_filename}")
121	                if not temp_build_script_filename.exists():
122	                    # If not, revert to building an internal container
123	                    # DBDB Why?
124	                    container_build_script_dir = build_context.default_container_base_dir
125	                build_dir = container_build_script_dir.joinpath(building_container.name.replace("/", "-"))
126	                build_script_filename = build_dir.joinpath("build.sh")
127	                build_envs["STACK_BUILD_DIR"] = build_dir
128	
129	    if not build_dir:
130	        build_dir = build_context.default_container_base_dir.joinpath(building_container.name.replace("/", "-"))
131	        build_script_filename = build_dir.joinpath("build.sh")
132	
133	    log_debug(f"Build script filename: {build_script_filename}")
134	    log_debug(f"Build script filename: {build_dir}")
135	
136	    if os.path.exists(build_script_filename):
137	        build_command = build_script_filename.as_posix()
138	    else:
139	        log_debug(f"No script file found: {build_script_filename}, using default build script")
140	        if building_container.ref:
141	            repo_full_path = fs_path_for_repo(building_container.ref)
142	        else:
143	            repo_full_path = stack.repo_path
144	
145	        if building_container.path:
146	            repo_full_path = repo_full_path.joinpath(building_container.path)
147	        repo_dir_or_build_dir = repo_full_path if repo_full_path and repo_full_path.exists() else build_dir
148	        build_command = (
149	            os.path.join(build_context.default_container_base_dir, "default-build.sh")
150	            + f" {default_container_tag} {repo_dir_or_build_dir}"
151	        )
152	        build_envs["STACK_BUILD_DIR"] = repo_dir_or_build_dir
153	
154	    build_envs["STACK_IMAGE_NAME"] = building_container.name
155	
156	    build_envs["STACK_REPO_STACK_DIR"] = str(stack.repo_path) if stack.repo_path else ""
157	    build_envs["STACK_REPO_CONTAINER_DIR"] = str(build_context.container.repo_path) if building_container.repo_path else build_envs["STACK_REPO_STACK_DIR"]
158	    build_envs["STACK_REPO_SOURCE_DIR"] = str(fs_path_for_repo(building_container.ref)) if building_container.ref else build_envs["STACK_REPO_CONTAINER_DIR"]
159	
160	    if not opts.o.dry_run:
161	        # No PATH at all causes failures with podman.
162	        if "PATH" not in build_envs:
163	            build_envs["PATH"] = os.environ["PATH"]
164	        log_debug(f"Executing: {build_command} with environment: {build_envs}")
165	
166	        build_result = run_shell_command(build_command, env=build_envs, quiet=opts.o.quiet)
167	
168	        log_debug(f"Build command return code is: {build_result}")
169	        if build_result != 0:
170	            return False
171	        else:
172	            return True
173	    else:
174	        log_info("Skipped for dry run")
175	        return True
176	
177	
178	def build_containers(parent_stack,
179	                     build_policy=get_config_setting("build-policy", BUILD_POLICIES[0]),
180	                     image_registry=get_config_setting("image-registry"),
181	                     publish_images=get_config_setting("publish-images", False),
182	                     include=None,
183	                     exclude=None,
184	                     extra_build_args=None,
185	                     git_ssh=get_config_setting("git-ssh", False),
186	                     git_pull=False,
187	                     dont_pull_repo_fs_paths=None,
188	                     target_arch=None,
189	                     dont_pull_images=False):
190	    dev_root_path = get_dev_root_path()
191	    required_stacks = parent_stack.get_required_stacks_paths()
192	    if not dont_pull_repo_fs_paths:
193	        dont_pull_repo_fs_paths = []
194	
195	    all_containers_in_scope = []
196	    finished_containers = {}
197	    for stack in required_stacks:
198	        stack = get_parsed_stack_config(stack)
199	        containers_in_scope = [c for c in get_containers_in_scope(stack) if include_exclude_check(c.name, include, exclude)]
200	        all_containers_in_scope.extend(containers_in_scope)
201	
202	    log_info(f"Found {len(all_containers_in_scope)} containers in {len(required_stacks)} stacks: "
203	             f"{', '.join([c.name for c in all_containers_in_scope])}", bold=True)
204	
205	    for stack in required_stacks:
206	        stack = get_parsed_stack_config(stack)
207	
208	        if build_policy not in BUILD_POLICIES:
209	            error_exit(f"{build_policy} is not one of {BUILD_POLICIES}")
210	
211	        # See: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/25389095/python-get-path-of-root-project-structure
212	        default_container_base_dir = Path(__file__).absolute().parent.parent.joinpath("data", "container-build")
213	
214	        log_debug("Dev Root is: {dev_root_path}")
215	
216	        if not os.path.isdir(dev_root_path):
217	            log_debug("Dev root directory doesn't exist, creating")
218	
219	        if target_arch and target_arch != local_container_arch():
Thinking
$ Bash
Resolve external container build dir constants
grep -n "stack_files_directory_name\|containers_directory_name\|stacks_directory\|container_build" src/stack/constants.py
29:containers_directory_name = "containers"
60:stack_files_directory_name = "stack-files"
Thinking

The external-repo build path has some self-acknowledged rough edges in the code (the DBDB ... seems not to work comments β€” your own notes). Rather than guess the layout, let me wait for the research agent, which is reconciling the stacks/ vs stack-files/containers/ vs container-build/ naming. I'll hold for it.

$ Bash
Look for external buildable-container examples in sibling repos
echo "Checking for any existing external buildable-container example to copy convention from:"; grep -rln "containers:" /home/david/projects/bpi/*/stacks/*/stack.yml 2>/dev/null; echo "--- machine repo stacks? ---"; find /home/david/projects/bpi/machine -name "stack.yml" 2>/dev/null | head; find /home/david/projects/bpi -maxdepth 3 -type d -name "containers" 2>/dev/null | grep -v "/stack/src" | head
Checking for any existing external buildable-container example to copy convention from:
--- machine repo stacks? ---
Thinking

No external examples to copy from in the sibling repos, so the agent's reconciliation is important. Let me wait for it to finish before scaffolding into possibly-wrong directories.

$ Bash
wait for research agent
sleep 30; echo done
<tool_use_error>Blocked: sleep 30 followed by: echo done. To wait for a condition, use Monitor with an until-loop (e.g. `until <check>; do sleep 2; done`). To wait for a command you started, use run_in_background: true. Do not chain shorter sleeps to work around this block.</tool_use_error>
Thinking

I shouldn't poll. The research agent is reconciling exactly the directory-convention ambiguity I hit (stacks/ vs stack-files/containers/ vs container-build/, and the buggy external-build resolution path). I'll wait for its result before scaffolding so I don't create files in the wrong layout β€” I'll continue automatically when it reports back.

While I wait, here's where things stand and the one open decision its findings will settle:

  • Solid: the image itself builds from a build.sh (sourcing build-base.sh) + Containerfile + scripts/, tagged bozemanpass/backup:stack; the stack is declared by a stack.yml with containers: [bozemanpass/backup] and pods: [backup], mirroring docker-ingress-stack.
  • Open: the exact directory an external fetched repo must use so stack prepare --stack backup finds and builds the container. The code looks under stack-files/containers/<name> but carries your own DBDB … seems not to work comments, so I want the agent's reconciliation (and whether to follow the proven ingress stacks/ layout) before committing paths.

Once it reports, I'll scaffold: - stacks/backup/stack.yml + backup/composefile.yml (the canonical backup service the injection pass mirrors), - the container build dir with Containerfile (restic + cron) and scripts/ (entrypoint.sh cron setup, backup.sh hook-runner + restic backup + retention, restore.sh),

then point the implementation sketch's bozemanpass/backup: reference at it.

a36bb9bcdab8719f9 toolu_01H81sVyRbnxQMa9kycNztLB /tmp/claude-1000/-home-david-projects-bpi-stack/83ff7993-2200-4857-b374-743227b368dd/tasks/a36bb9bcdab8719f9.output completed

Agent "Find buildable-container stack convention" finished

A task-notification fires each time this agent stops with no live background children of its own. The user can send it another message and resume it, so the same task-id may notify more than once. Now I have thoroughly investigated the codebase. Here are my findings on how BPI Stack handles custom container builds:

1. Declaring Containers in stack.yml

File: /home/david/projects/bpi/stack/src/stack/data/stacks/webapp-template/stack.yml

A stack.yml file declares containers in a containers section with either simple names or detailed objects:

containers:
  - name: bozemanpass/act-runner
    ref: bozemanpass/gitea-containers      # optional: repo containing build info
    path: ./act-runner                      # optional: path within repo
  - bozemanpass/simple-container            # simple form (just a name)

Source code reference: /home/david/projects/bpi/stack/src/stack/build/build_util.py:128 - the stack reads stack_config.get("containers", []), allowing both string names (lines 138-140) and objects with name/ref/path fields (line 142).


2. Directory/File Conventions for Buildable Containers

A stack repository organizes containers in a standard directory hierarchy. According to the documentation at /home/david/projects/bpi/stack/docs/stack-files.md:22-30, the container build directory must contain at least one of:

  • container.yml β€” metadata file defining the container's build configuration
  • build.sh β€” custom build script (result must tag image as &lt;name&gt;:stack)
  • Dockerfile or Containerfile β€” standard Dockerfile (built with default build.sh)

Example layout in built-in containers (at /home/david/projects/bpi/stack/src/stack/data/container-build/):

container-build/
β”œβ”€β”€ bozemanpass-webapp-base/     # Name "bozemanpass/webapp-base" (/ β†’ -)
β”‚   β”œβ”€β”€ Containerfile
β”‚   β”œβ”€β”€ build.sh
β”‚   └── scripts/
β”œβ”€β”€ bozemanpass-nextjs-base/
β”‚   β”œβ”€β”€ Containerfile
β”‚   └── build.sh
β”œβ”€β”€ default-build.sh             # Used if no custom build.sh
└── build-base.sh                # Sourced by build scripts

3. Container Name to Build Directory Mapping

Source: /home/david/projects/bpi/stack/src/stack/build/build_containers.py:117 and line 125

Naming convention: Container names are converted by replacing / with -:

bozemanpass/backup       β†’  bozemanpass-backup
bozemanpass/act-runner   β†’  bozemanpass-act-runner

Discovery logic (lines 114-127): 1. If container has explicit path in stack.yml, use repo:path/ for build directory 2. Else, look for stack-files/containers/{name.replace('/', '-')}/ within the container's repository 3. Else, look in built-in src/stack/data/container-build/{name.replace('/', '-')}/

The build system searches for build.sh in the final directory (line 118: build_dir.joinpath("build.sh")). If not found, it uses the default build script (line 149: default-build.sh).


4. Existing Example in Repo

File: /home/david/projects/bpi/stack/src/stack/data/stacks/webapp-template/stack.yml

name: internal-stack-webapp-template
description: "webapp template stack"
containers:
  - bozemanpass/webapp-template-container
pods:
  - webapp-template

Associated composefile at /home/david/projects/bpi/stack/src/stack/data/compose/composefile-webapp-template.yml:

services:
  webapp:
    image: bozemanpass/webapp-container:stack     # Note :stack tag

Built-in base containers are defined at /home/david/projects/bpi/stack/src/stack/data/container-build/, with bozemanpass-webapp-base/build.sh (line 11) showing the expected tagging pattern: bozemanpass/webapp-base:stack.


5. The :stack Tag Convention

Purpose: A local build-time tag indicating "this image was built locally for this stack."

Key locations: - Build side (/home/david/projects/bpi/stack/src/stack/build/build_containers.py:86): All built images are tagged as {container_name}:stack - Deployment side (/home/david/projects/bpi/stack/src/stack/deploy/deployment_create.py:535-536): python if image_name.endswith(":stack"): service_info["image"] = image_name[:-5] + deployment_command_context.cluster_context.cluster The :stack suffix is replaced with the cluster name (e.g., mainnet, testnet) at deployment time. This allows the same composefile to be deployed to different clusters with different image tags per cluster.

Alternative tags (/home/david/projects/bpi/stack/src/stack/deploy/images.py:30, 38): - :local β€” legacy tag for locally-built images - Images ending in :stack or :local trigger push operations when publishing remotely

Remote tagging convention (/home/david/projects/bpi/stack/docs/fetching-containers.md:20): Published remotely as {container_name}:{git_hash} (e.g., bozemanpass/gitea:ae0af8ea5b2de99a49add2b7f7b76dde62a8a617).


Summary: A stack that builds custom containers lists them in stack.yml's containers section with optional ref (repo) and path (directory within repo). The build system finds a build.sh, Dockerfile, or uses the default build script. Containers are tagged :stack locally, then the tag is replaced with the cluster name (:{cluster}) during deployment for multi-cluster deployments. 5153939126631

Thinking

Now I have the authoritative convention. Let me read the spec doc it referenced to nail the exact external-repo layout before scaffolding.

βš™ Read
{
  "file_path": "/home/david/projects/bpi/stack/docs/stack-files.md"
}
1	## stack.yml
2	
3	The `stack.yml` file defines the structure and configuration of a deployment stack. It specifies the containers, pods,
4	and any pre/post-start commands required for the deployment.
5	
6	### Example
7	
8	```yaml
9	# The name of the stack.
10	name: gitea
11	# A brief description of the stack (optional).
12	description: "Gitea SCM and Actions"
13	# A list of containers to be used in the stack.
14	containers:
15	    # The name of the container in the form `<organization>/<name>`.  The pod's composefile.yml will need to use the
16	    # same name for the image with the tag `stack`.  For example: `image: bozemanpass/act-runner:stack`
17	  - name: bozemanpass/act-runner
18	    # An (optional) reference to the container's repository.  The format is: [hostname/]organization/repo[@tag_or_branch]
19	    # The hostname is optional.  When omitted, github.com is assumed.  The tag is also optional.  If omitted,
20	    # the main repo branch is used.  If `ref` is omitted entirely, the current repo is assumed.
21	    ref: bozemanpass/gitea-containers
22	    # The relative path in the repo to the container build info.  This directory must contain one (or more) of:
23	    #   - container.yml descriptor file (more info below)
24	    #   - build.sh build script
25	    #        The result of execution should be a local image tagged `<name>:stack`.  The exact tag is available
26	    #        in the script build environment under ${STACK_DEFAULT_CONTAINER_IMAGE_TAG}.
27	    #   - Dockerfile
28	    #        The container will be built using the Dockerfile in this directory similar to:
29	    #             docker build -t ${STACK_DEFAULT_CONTAINER_IMAGE_TAG} .
30	    path: ./act-runner
31	  - name: bozemanpass/gitea
32	    ref: bozemanpass/gitea-containers
33	    path: ./gitea
34	# Pods are groups of containers that are deployed together.  Each pod corresponds to one composefile.yml.
35	pods:
36	    # The name of the pod.
37	  - name: gitea
38	    # The relative path in this repo to the directory containing the pod composefile.yml and other files.
39	    path: ./gitea
40	    # An (optional) command to run just _before_ the pod starts. The command is executed on the host, and the location
41	    # is relative to the `path` specified above.  The deployment directory will be set in the environment under
42	    # ${STACK_DEPLOYMENT_DIR}, allowing a script to execute commands _inside_ the service containers with: 
43	    #     stack manage --dir ${STACK_DEPLOYMENT_DIR} exec <service> <command>
44	    pre_start_command: "run-this-first.sh"
45	    # Similar to pre_start_command, but executed _after_ the pod starts.
46	    post_start_command: "initialize-gitea.sh"
47	  - name: act-runner
48	    path: ./act-runner
49	    pre_start_command: "pre_start.sh"
50	    post_start_command: "post_start.sh"
51	```
52	
53	## container.yml
54	
55	The `container.yml` file defines the build configuration for individual containers within a stack.  It specifies the container's name,
56	the repository reference, and the build script or command to be used for building the container image.
57	
58	The build script path is relative to the `container.yml` file, not the target repo.  In practice, this allows for build
59	scripts to be located in a separate repo from the container's source code, which is very useful for building customized
60	container images from repositories that are not under your control.
61	
62	The following example from the `bozemanpass/gitea-containers` repo builds the `bozemanpass/act-runner` container directly from
63	the `gitea.com/gitea/act_runner` repo, for example.
64	
65	### Example
66	```yaml
67	container:
68	  # The name of the container in the form `<organization>/<name>`.  The pod's composefile.yml will need to use the
69	  # same name for the image with the tag `stack`.  For example: `image: bozemanpass/act-runner:stack`
70	  name: bozemanpass/act-runner
71	  # An optional reference to the container's repository.  The format is: [hostname/]organization/repo[@tag_or_branch]
72	  # The hostname is optional.  When omitted, github.com is assumed.  The tag is also optional.  If omitted,
73	  # the main repo branch is used.  If `ref` is omitted entirely, the current repo is assumed.
74	  ref: gitea.com/gitea/act_runner
75	  # Optional path to the container build script or command.  This path is relative to the `container.yml` file.
76	  # If no build script is provided, the default build command will be used.
77	  build: ./build.sh
78	```
79	
80	## container.lock
81	
82	The `container.lock` file contains the git commit hash of the target repo.  If not already present, the file is
83	automatically generated when the container is built.  It can be committed to the repo to ensure the build will be
84	repeatable in the future, and when the repository is pulled by `stack` the appropriate commit will be checked out.
85	
86	> Note: Even when `container.lock` is present, any local code changes will be included when building the container,
87	> since the hash is used only when the repository is cloned or pulled.
88	
89	## composefile.yml
90	
91	The `composefile.yml` file defines the structure and configuration of a pod. It specifies the containers, volumes, 
92	environment variables, and any other settings required for the pod's deployment.
93	
94	It is compatible in syntax with `docker-compose.yml`.
95	
96	### Example
97	```yaml
98	services:
99	  runner:
100	    image: bozemanpass/act-runner:stack
101	    restart: always
102	    privileged: true
103	    environment:
104	      - CONFIG_FILE=/config/act-runner-config.yml
105	      - GITEA_INSTANCE_URL=http://${STACK_SVC_GITEA}:3000
106	    volumes:
107	      - act-runner-data:/data
108	      - act-runner-config:/config:ro
109	    ports:
110	      - 8088
111	
112	volumes:
113	  act-runner-data:
114	  act-runner-config:
115	```
116	
117	### Environment Variables for Service Hostnames
118	
119	When using `stack` to manage a pod, the service hostnames are automatically set in the environment variables for
120	each service.  This allows for easy access to the hostnames of other services within the same deployment.  The variables
121	are in the form `$STACK_SVC_<NAME>`, where `<NAME>` is the uppercase name of the service name as it appears in the
122	`composefile.yml`.  In the example above, `$STACK_SVC_GITEA` would contain the hostname of the `gitea` service (located
123	in another pod in the same deployment), and `$STACK_SVC_RUNNER` would be set to the hostname of the `runner` service.
Thinking

That's the authoritative spec. Key facts that settle the layout:

  • A buildable container is declared in stack.yml's containers: with name + optional ref/path pointing at a dir containing build.sh/Containerfile/container.yml. Using an explicit path sidesteps the buggy nameβ†’dir inference (your DBDB notes).
  • Pod/container paths are relative to repo root (confirmed by how docker-ingress-stack resolves path: docker-ingress β†’ repo-root docker-ingress/composefile.yml).
  • Image tag bozemanpass/backup:stack, rewritten to the cluster name at deploy.

I'll also make one design refinement while scaffolding: for the consistency hooks, the backup container will mount docker.sock and docker exec the dump command inside the target service β€” mirroring how nginx-proxy uses the sock, and matching K8up's "exec into the pod" model. That avoids baking every DB client into the image. Let me scaffold.

$ Bash
Create backup-stack directory layout
cd /home/david/projects/bpi/backup-stack && mkdir -p stacks/backup backup containers/backup/scripts && find . -not -path './.git/*' -type d | sort
.
./.git
./backup
./containers
./containers/backup
./containers/backup/scripts
./stacks
./stacks/backup
Shell cwd was reset to /home/david/projects/bpi/stack
Thinking

Now writing the repo files. Scaffold first, then I'll align the implementation doc with the two refinements (docker.sock hooks, canonical service-def living here).

πŸ“ Write stack.yml
/home/david/projects/bpi/backup-stack/stacks/backup/stack.yml
name: backup
description: "Backup and restore of stack service data (restic to S3 object storage)"
# The backup container image (built from ./containers/backup in this repo).
containers:
  - name: bozemanpass/backup
    path: ./containers/backup
# A single-service pod. When backup is enabled, `stack deploy` injects read-only mounts
# of the application's data volumes into this pod's `backup` service.
pods:
  - name: backup
    path: ./backup
πŸ“ Write composefile.yml
/home/david/projects/bpi/backup-stack/backup/composefile.yml
services:
  backup:
    image: bozemanpass/backup:stack
    restart: always
    volumes:
      # The Docker socket lets the backup service run consistency hooks (e.g. pg_dump)
      # *inside* the target service container, the same way the ingress proxy uses it.
      - /var/run/docker.sock:/var/run/docker.sock:ro
      # restic's local cache, to keep incremental backups fast.
      - backup-restic-cache:/root/.cache/restic
      #
      # NOTE: read-only mounts of the application's data volumes are INJECTED here by
      # `stack deploy` when backup is enabled. Each becomes `- <vol>:/backup/<vol>:ro`.
      # See ../stack/docs/backup-implementation.md.

volumes:
  backup-restic-cache:
πŸ“ Write build.sh
/home/david/projects/bpi/backup-stack/containers/backup/build.sh
#!/usr/bin/env bash
# Build bozemanpass/backup
set -euo pipefail

SCRIPT_DIR=$( cd -- "$( dirname -- "${BASH_SOURCE[0]}" )" &> /dev/null && pwd )

# `stack build` provides the target tag (e.g. bozemanpass/backup:stack, or :<cluster>
# when publishing). Fall back to the local :stack tag for a manual build.
TAG="${STACK_DEFAULT_CONTAINER_IMAGE_TAG:-bozemanpass/backup:stack}"

docker build -t "$TAG" ${build_command_args:-} -f "$SCRIPT_DIR/Containerfile" "$SCRIPT_DIR"
File created successfully at: /home/david/projects/bpi/backup-stack/stacks/backup/stack.yml (file state is current in your context β€” no need to Read it back)
πŸ“ Write Containerfile
/home/david/projects/bpi/backup-stack/containers/backup/Containerfile
FROM alpine:3.20

# restic     - the backup engine (mandatory client-side encryption, dedup, S3-native)
# docker-cli - to exec consistency hooks (pg_dump, etc.) inside target containers
# bash       - script runtime
# tzdata     - correct cron scheduling in the configured timezone
# ca-certificates - TLS to the object store
RUN apk add --no-cache restic bash docker-cli tzdata ca-certificates

COPY scripts /scripts
RUN chmod +x /scripts/*.sh

WORKDIR /backup

# Default mode is the scheduler. Other modes: backup | restore | prune | check.
ENTRYPOINT ["/scripts/docker-entrypoint.sh"]
CMD ["schedule"]
File created successfully at: /home/david/projects/bpi/backup-stack/backup/composefile.yml (file state is current in your context β€” no need to Read it back)
File created successfully at: /home/david/projects/bpi/backup-stack/containers/backup/build.sh (file state is current in your context β€” no need to Read it back)
File created successfully at: /home/david/projects/bpi/backup-stack/containers/backup/Containerfile (file state is current in your context β€” no need to Read it back)
πŸ“ Write lib.sh
/home/david/projects/bpi/backup-stack/containers/backup/scripts/lib.sh
#!/usr/bin/env bash
# Shared restic environment setup, sourced by the other scripts.
set -euo pipefail

# Build RESTIC_REPOSITORY from the S3 settings if it was not supplied directly.
if [ -z "${RESTIC_REPOSITORY:-}" ]; then
  if [ -n "${BACKUP_S3_ENDPOINT:-}" ] && [ -n "${BACKUP_S3_BUCKET:-}" ]; then
    export RESTIC_REPOSITORY="s3:https://${BACKUP_S3_ENDPOINT}/${BACKUP_S3_BUCKET}"
  else
    echo "backup: no RESTIC_REPOSITORY (or BACKUP_S3_ENDPOINT + BACKUP_S3_BUCKET) configured" >&2
    exit 1
  fi
fi

# The encryption key is mandatory: without it the repository cannot be read back.
if [ -z "${RESTIC_PASSWORD:-}" ] && [ -z "${RESTIC_PASSWORD_FILE:-}" ]; then
  echo "backup: RESTIC_PASSWORD is not set - refusing to run without an encryption key" >&2
  exit 1
fi

# Create the repository on first use (idempotent).
ensure_repo() {
  if ! restic cat config >/dev/null 2>&1; then
    echo "backup: initializing restic repository at ${RESTIC_REPOSITORY}"
    restic init
  fi
}
File created successfully at: /home/david/projects/bpi/backup-stack/containers/backup/scripts/lib.sh (file state is current in your context β€” no need to Read it back)

Now the operational scripts:

πŸ“ Write docker-entrypoint.sh
/home/david/projects/bpi/backup-stack/containers/backup/scripts/docker-entrypoint.sh
#!/usr/bin/env bash
set -euo pipefail
source /scripts/lib.sh

mode="${1:-schedule}"
case "$mode" in
  schedule)
    ensure_repo
    schedule="${BACKUP_SCHEDULE:-0 3 * * *}"
    echo "backup: scheduling '${schedule}'  ->  /scripts/backup.sh"
    # Single cron entry; send job output to PID 1's stdout so it shows in container logs.
    echo "${schedule} /scripts/backup.sh >> /proc/1/fd/1 2>&1" > /etc/crontabs/root
    exec crond -f -l 8
    ;;
  backup)  exec /scripts/backup.sh ;;
  restore) shift; exec /scripts/restore.sh "$@" ;;
  prune)   exec /scripts/prune.sh ;;
  check)   ensure_repo; exec restic check ;;
  *)
    echo "backup: unknown mode '$mode' (expected: schedule|backup|restore|prune|check)" >&2
    exit 2
    ;;
esac
File created successfully at: /home/david/projects/bpi/backup-stack/containers/backup/scripts/docker-entrypoint.sh (file state is current in your context β€” no need to Read it back)
πŸ“ Write backup.sh
/home/david/projects/bpi/backup-stack/containers/backup/scripts/backup.sh
#!/usr/bin/env bash
set -euo pipefail
source /scripts/lib.sh
ensure_repo

# 1. Run consistency hooks (logical dumps) into the backup tree.
/scripts/run-hooks.sh

# 2. Back up everything mounted under /backup: the read-only data volumes plus any dumps.
echo "backup: starting restic backup of /backup"
restic backup --host "${STACK_DEPLOYMENT:-stack}" /backup

# 3. Apply the retention policy.
/scripts/prune.sh

echo "backup: complete"
File created successfully at: /home/david/projects/bpi/backup-stack/containers/backup/scripts/backup.sh (file state is current in your context β€” no need to Read it back)
πŸ“ Write run-hooks.sh
/home/david/projects/bpi/backup-stack/containers/backup/scripts/run-hooks.sh
#!/usr/bin/env bash
# Run per-service consistency-dump commands *inside* their containers (via the Docker
# socket) and write the output under /backup/_dumps so restic captures a consistent
# logical backup alongside the file-level volume data.
#
# BACKUP_PRE_HOOKS format:  "service:command:ext;service2:command2:ext2"
#   e.g.  "db:pg_dump -U postgres -d todos:sql"
set -euo pipefail

hooks="${BACKUP_PRE_HOOKS:-}"
[ -z "$hooks" ] && exit 0

dump_dir="/backup/_dumps"
mkdir -p "$dump_dir"

# Resolve the compose project of THIS container, so hooks only exec into sibling services
# in the same deployment.
self_id="$(grep -o -m1 '[0-9a-f]\{64\}' /proc/self/cgroup || true)"
project="$(docker inspect -f '{{ index .Config.Labels "com.docker.compose.project" }}' "$self_id" 2>/dev/null || true)"

IFS=';' read -ra entries <<< "$hooks"
for entry in "${entries[@]}"; do
  [ -z "$entry" ] && continue
  svc="${entry%%:*}"; rest="${entry#*:}"
  cmd="${rest%:*}"; ext="${rest##*:}"

  cid="$(docker ps -q \
      --filter "label=com.docker.compose.project=${project}" \
      --filter "label=com.docker.compose.service=${svc}" | head -n1)"
  if [ -z "$cid" ]; then
    echo "backup: hook target service '${svc}' not found - skipping" >&2
    continue
  fi

  echo "backup: dumping '${svc}' (${cmd})"
  docker exec "$cid" sh -c "$cmd" > "${dump_dir}/${svc}.${ext}"
done
File created successfully at: /home/david/projects/bpi/backup-stack/containers/backup/scripts/run-hooks.sh (file state is current in your context β€” no need to Read it back)
πŸ“ Write prune.sh
/home/david/projects/bpi/backup-stack/containers/backup/scripts/prune.sh
#!/usr/bin/env bash
set -euo pipefail
source /scripts/lib.sh

# Word-splitting of $retention is intentional (the flags are passed through to restic).
retention="${BACKUP_RETENTION:---keep-daily 7 --keep-weekly 4 --keep-monthly 6}"
echo "backup: applying retention (${retention})"
# shellcheck disable=SC2086
restic forget --prune $retention
File created successfully at: /home/david/projects/bpi/backup-stack/containers/backup/scripts/prune.sh (file state is current in your context β€” no need to Read it back)
πŸ“ Write restore.sh
/home/david/projects/bpi/backup-stack/containers/backup/scripts/restore.sh
#!/usr/bin/env bash
# Restore a snapshot into the volume tree.
#
# Usage: restore.sh [snapshot-id]    (default: latest)
#
# Restore is run as a distinct mode: the full application stack is stopped first and the
# data volumes are mounted READ-WRITE under /backup, so restic writes the chosen epoch's
# data back in place. The full stack is then started again. See ../stack/docs/backup.md.
set -euo pipefail
source /scripts/lib.sh
ensure_repo

snapshot="${1:-latest}"
echo "backup: restoring snapshot '${snapshot}' into /backup"
restic restore "$snapshot" --target /

# NOTE: logical dumps land back under /backup/_dumps as files. Replaying them into a live
# database (e.g. pg_restore) is a deliberate follow-up, not yet automated - see the
# "Restore" and open-questions sections of docs/backup.md.
echo "backup: restore complete"
File created successfully at: /home/david/projects/bpi/backup-stack/containers/backup/scripts/restore.sh (file state is current in your context β€” no need to Read it back)
πŸ“ Write README.md
/home/david/projects/bpi/backup-stack/README.md
# backup-stack

Backup and restore of persistent service data for the
[`stack`](https://github.com/bozemanpass/stack) tool's Docker deployment mode.

> **Status: initial scaffold β€” not yet functional.** The container scripts are a starting point and have
> not been run end-to-end. See the design in the `stack` repo: `docs/backup.md` and
> `docs/backup-implementation.md`.

## What this provides

`bozemanpass/backup` β€” a small Alpine image bundling:

- [restic](https://restic.net) β€” the backup engine: mandatory client-side encryption, deduplication, and
  native S3 support, so commodity object storage can be used safely;
- a cron scheduler;
- the Docker CLI β€” used to run application-consistency hooks (e.g. `pg_dump`) *inside* the target service
  container, the same way the ingress proxy uses the Docker socket.

On Kubernetes the equivalent role is played by [K8up](https://k8up.io) (also restic-based), so the two
targets produce interchangeable repositories. This repo covers the Docker case only.

## Layout

| Path | Purpose |
|------|---------|
| `stacks/backup/stack.yml` | Stack definition β€” declares the container and the pod. |
| `backup/composefile.yml` | The canonical `backup` service. `stack deploy` injects read-only mounts of the application's data volumes here when backup is enabled. |
| `containers/backup/` | The `bozemanpass/backup` image: `Containerfile`, `build.sh`, and `scripts/`. |

## Container modes

The image entrypoint takes a mode argument (default `schedule`):

| Mode | Action |
|------|--------|
| `schedule` | Install a cron entry (`BACKUP_SCHEDULE`) that runs `backup` periodically. |
| `backup` | Run hooks, then `restic backup` of `/backup`, then apply retention. |
| `restore [snapshot]` | Restore a snapshot into the (rw-mounted) volumes. Default `latest`. |
| `prune` | Apply the retention policy (`restic forget --prune`). |
| `check` | Verify repository integrity. |

## Configuration

Supplied by `stack` from the deployment environment (see `docs/backup.md` for the profile keys):

| Variable | Purpose |
|----------|---------|
| `BACKUP_S3_ENDPOINT`, `BACKUP_S3_BUCKET` | Object store location (or set `RESTIC_REPOSITORY` directly). |
| `AWS_ACCESS_KEY_ID`, `AWS_SECRET_ACCESS_KEY` | Object store credentials. |
| `RESTIC_PASSWORD` | **Encryption key** β€” mandatory. Without it the repository is unreadable. |
| `BACKUP_SCHEDULE` | Cron schedule (default `0 3 * * *`). |
| `BACKUP_RETENTION` | `forget`/`prune` flags (default `--keep-daily 7 --keep-weekly 4 --keep-monthly 6`). |
| `BACKUP_PRE_HOOKS` | `service:command:ext;…` consistency dumps, generated from `@stack backup-command` annotations. |

## Build &amp; use (intended)

```bash
stack fetch repo bozemanpass/backup-stack
stack prepare --stack backup          # builds bozemanpass/backup:stack
# Backup is then enabled per-deployment via the `backup` config switch; see docs/backup.md.
```
<tool_use_error>File has not been read yet. Read it first before writing to it.</tool_use_error>
Thinking

The README already exists β€” need to read before overwriting.

βš™ Read
{
  "file_path": "/home/david/projects/bpi/backup-stack/README.md"
}
1	# backup-stack
2	Backup components for the "stack" tool's docker deployment mode
3	
πŸ“ Write README.md
/home/david/projects/bpi/backup-stack/README.md
# backup-stack

Backup and restore of persistent service data for the
[`stack`](https://github.com/bozemanpass/stack) tool's Docker deployment mode.

> **Status: initial scaffold β€” not yet functional.** The container scripts are a starting point and have
> not been run end-to-end. See the design in the `stack` repo: `docs/backup.md` and
> `docs/backup-implementation.md`.

## What this provides

`bozemanpass/backup` β€” a small Alpine image bundling:

- [restic](https://restic.net) β€” the backup engine: mandatory client-side encryption, deduplication, and
  native S3 support, so commodity object storage can be used safely;
- a cron scheduler;
- the Docker CLI β€” used to run application-consistency hooks (e.g. `pg_dump`) *inside* the target service
  container, the same way the ingress proxy uses the Docker socket.

On Kubernetes the equivalent role is played by [K8up](https://k8up.io) (also restic-based), so the two
targets produce interchangeable repositories. This repo covers the Docker case only.

## Layout

| Path | Purpose |
|------|---------|
| `stacks/backup/stack.yml` | Stack definition β€” declares the container and the pod. |
| `backup/composefile.yml` | The canonical `backup` service. `stack deploy` injects read-only mounts of the application's data volumes here when backup is enabled. |
| `containers/backup/` | The `bozemanpass/backup` image: `Containerfile`, `build.sh`, and `scripts/`. |

## Container modes

The image entrypoint takes a mode argument (default `schedule`):

| Mode | Action |
|------|--------|
| `schedule` | Install a cron entry (`BACKUP_SCHEDULE`) that runs `backup` periodically. |
| `backup` | Run hooks, then `restic backup` of `/backup`, then apply retention. |
| `restore [snapshot]` | Restore a snapshot into the (rw-mounted) volumes. Default `latest`. |
| `prune` | Apply the retention policy (`restic forget --prune`). |
| `check` | Verify repository integrity. |

## Configuration

Supplied by `stack` from the deployment environment (see `docs/backup.md` for the profile keys):

| Variable | Purpose |
|----------|---------|
| `BACKUP_S3_ENDPOINT`, `BACKUP_S3_BUCKET` | Object store location (or set `RESTIC_REPOSITORY` directly). |
| `AWS_ACCESS_KEY_ID`, `AWS_SECRET_ACCESS_KEY` | Object store credentials. |
| `RESTIC_PASSWORD` | **Encryption key** β€” mandatory. Without it the repository is unreadable. |
| `BACKUP_SCHEDULE` | Cron schedule (default `0 3 * * *`). |
| `BACKUP_RETENTION` | `forget`/`prune` flags (default `--keep-daily 7 --keep-weekly 4 --keep-monthly 6`). |
| `BACKUP_PRE_HOOKS` | `service:command:ext;…` consistency dumps, generated from `@stack backup-command` annotations. |

## Build &amp; use (intended)

```bash
stack fetch repo bozemanpass/backup-stack
stack prepare --stack backup          # builds bozemanpass/backup:stack
# Backup is then enabled per-deployment via the `backup` config switch; see docs/backup.md.
```
The file /home/david/projects/bpi/backup-stack/README.md has been updated successfully. (file state is current in your context β€” no need to Read it back)
Thinking

Let me make the scripts executable and verify the final tree.

$ Bash
Set perms and syntax-check scripts
cd /home/david/projects/bpi/backup-stack && chmod +x containers/backup/build.sh containers/backup/scripts/*.sh && echo "=== final tree ===" && find . -not -path './.git/*' -type f | sort && echo && echo "=== bash syntax check on scripts ===" && for f in containers/backup/build.sh containers/backup/scripts/*.sh; do bash -n "$f" && echo "ok: $f" || echo "SYNTAX ERROR: $f"; done
=== final tree ===
./README.md
./backup/composefile.yml
./containers/backup/Containerfile
./containers/backup/build.sh
./containers/backup/scripts/backup.sh
./containers/backup/scripts/docker-entrypoint.sh
./containers/backup/scripts/lib.sh
./containers/backup/scripts/prune.sh
./containers/backup/scripts/restore.sh
./containers/backup/scripts/run-hooks.sh
./stacks/backup/stack.yml

=== bash syntax check on scripts ===
ok: containers/backup/build.sh
ok: containers/backup/scripts/backup.sh
ok: containers/backup/scripts/docker-entrypoint.sh
ok: containers/backup/scripts/lib.sh
ok: containers/backup/scripts/prune.sh
ok: containers/backup/scripts/restore.sh
ok: containers/backup/scripts/run-hooks.sh
Thinking

All scripts pass syntax checks. Now let me align the implementation doc with the two refinements the scaffold introduced (docker.sock-based hooks; the canonical service now lives in backup-stack and gets augmented rather than fabricated).

βš™ Read
{
  "file_path": "/home/david/projects/bpi/stack/docs/backup-implementation.md",
  "offset": 85,
  "limit": 75
}
85	# deploy/spec.py
86	def get_backup(self):
87	    return self.obj.get(constants.backup_key, {})
88	```
89	
90	Because `backup` is a plain dict it merges additively across mixed-in specs with no special handling, like
91	the other spec sections.
92	
93	## 3. Inject the backup service at deploy time β€” `deploy/deployment_create.py`
94	
95	This is the core of the pass. After the per-pod compose files are written (the loop ending at
96	`deployment_create.py:577`), and only for the `compose` target with the master switch enabled, write **one
97	synthetic compose file** containing the backup service.
98	
99	The backup service mounts the deployment's data **read-only**. On Docker every named volume is already a
100	bind mount under `<deployment-dir>/data/<volume-name>/` (`_fixup_pod_file`, line 77), so the backup service
101	can bind-mount those host paths directly β€” sidestepping cross-compose-file named-volume declaration
102	entirely.
103	
104	```python
105	# deploy/deployment_create.py β€” after the `for pod in pods:` loop (~line 577)
106	
107	from stack.config.util import get_config_setting
108	
109	def _maybe_write_backup_compose(parsed_spec, deployment_type, deployment_dir_path, destination_compose_dir):
110	    if deployment_type != "compose":
111	        return                                    # k8s path emits K8up resources instead (separate step)
112	    if not get_config_setting("backup", False):   # explicit master switch (env β†’ profile β†’ default false)
113	        return
114	
115	    backup_cfg = parsed_spec.get_backup()
116	    exclude = set(backup_cfg.get("exclude", []))
117	
118	    # All read-write named volumes, minus author-excluded ones.
119	    volumes = parsed_spec.get_volumes()           # {name: host_path_or_None}
120	    backed_up = [v for v in volumes if v not in exclude]
121	
122	    mounts = [f"../../data/{v}:/backup/{v}:ro" for v in backed_up]   # relative to the compose dir
123	
124	    # Per-service consistent-dump hooks (run inside the backup container, reaching services by name
125	    # over the shared compose network).
126	    pre_hooks = []
127	    for svc, c in backup_cfg.get("commands", {}).items():
128	        ext = c.get("file_extension", "dump")
129	        pre_hooks.append(f"{svc}:{c['command']}:{ext}")   # parsed by the backup image entrypoint
130	
131	    backup_service = {
132	        "image": f"bozemanpass/backup:{deployment_command_context.cluster_context.cluster}",
133	        "restart": "always",
134	        "volumes": mounts,
135	        "env_file": [relative_path_to(constants.config_file_name)],   # brings in S3 creds + restic-password
136	        "environment": {
137	            "BACKUP_DEST": get_config_setting("backup-s3-bucket"),
138	            "BACKUP_S3_ENDPOINT": get_config_setting("backup-s3-endpoint"),
139	            "BACKUP_SCHEDULE": get_config_setting("backup-schedule", "0 3 * * *"),
140	            "BACKUP_RETENTION": get_config_setting(
141	                "backup-retention", "--keep-daily 7 --keep-weekly 4 --keep-monthly 6"),
142	            "BACKUP_PRE_HOOKS": ";".join(pre_hooks),
143	        },
144	    }
145	
146	    doc = {"services": {"backup": backup_service}}
147	    out = destination_compose_dir.joinpath(f"{constants.compose_file_prefix}-backup.yml")
148	    with open(out, "w") as f:
149	        get_yaml().dump(doc, f)
150	```
151	
152	Call it once, right after the pod loop:
153	
154	```python
155	    _maybe_write_backup_compose(parsed_spec, deployment_type, deployment_dir_path, destination_compose_dir)
156	```
157	
158	Notes:
159	
Thinking

The scaffold made Model B (augment the canonical service, like ingress augments nginx) cleaner than the original "fabricate a synthetic file" sketch β€” and it avoids duplicating the service definition in both Python and the repo. Let me update section 3 to match.

✏️ Edit backup-implementation.md
/home/david/projects/bpi/stack/docs/backup-implementation.md
βˆ’
## 3. Inject the backup service at deploy time β€” `deploy/deployment_create.py`

This is the core of the pass. After the per-pod compose files are written (the loop ending at
`deployment_create.py:577`), and only for the `compose` target with the master switch enabled, write **one
synthetic compose file** containing the backup service.

The backup service mounts the deployment's data **read-only**. On Docker every named volume is already a
bind mount under `<deployment-dir>/data/<volume-name>/` (`_fixup_pod_file`, line 77), so the backup service
can bind-mount those host paths directly β€” sidestepping cross-compose-file named-volume declaration
entirely.

```python
# deploy/deployment_create.py β€” after the `for pod in pods:` loop (~line 577)

from stack.config.util import get_config_setting

def _maybe_write_backup_compose(parsed_spec, deployment_type, deployment_dir_path, destination_compose_dir):
    if deployment_type != "compose":
        return                                    # k8s path emits K8up resources instead (separate step)
    if not get_config_setting("backup", False):   # explicit master switch (env β†’ profile β†’ default false)
        return

    backup_cfg = parsed_spec.get_backup()
    exclude = set(backup_cfg.get("exclude", []))

    # All read-write named volumes, minus author-excluded ones.
    volumes = parsed_spec.get_volumes()           # {name: host_path_or_None}
    backed_up = [v for v in volumes if v not in exclude]

    mounts = [f"../../data/{v}:/backup/{v}:ro" for v in backed_up]   # relative to the compose dir

    # Per-service consistent-dump hooks (run inside the backup container, reaching services by name
    # over the shared compose network).
    pre_hooks = []
    for svc, c in backup_cfg.get("commands", {}).items():
        ext = c.get("file_extension", "dump")
        pre_hooks.append(f"{svc}:{c['command']}:{ext}")   # parsed by the backup image entrypoint

    backup_service = {
        "image": f"bozemanpass/backup:{deployment_command_context.cluster_context.cluster}",
        "restart": "always",
        "volumes": mounts,
        "env_file": [relative_path_to(constants.config_file_name)],   # brings in S3 creds + restic-password
        "environment": {
            "BACKUP_DEST": get_config_setting("backup-s3-bucket"),
            "BACKUP_S3_ENDPOINT": get_config_setting("backup-s3-endpoint"),
            "BACKUP_SCHEDULE": get_config_setting("backup-schedule", "0 3 * * *"),
            "BACKUP_RETENTION": get_config_setting(
                "backup-retention", "--keep-daily 7 --keep-weekly 4 --keep-monthly 6"),
            "BACKUP_PRE_HOOKS": ";".join(pre_hooks),
        },
    }

    doc = {"services": {"backup": backup_service}}
    out = destination_compose_dir.joinpath(f"{constants.compose_file_prefix}-backup.yml")
    with open(out, "w") as f:
        get_yaml().dump(doc, f)
```

Call it once, right after the pod loop:

```python
    _maybe_write_backup_compose(parsed_spec, deployment_type, deployment_dir_path, destination_compose_dir)
```

Notes:
+
## 3. Augment the backup service at deploy time β€” `deploy/deployment_create.py`

This is the core of the pass, and it follows the ingress model exactly: the **backup service is defined in
the `backup-stack` repo** (`backup/composefile.yml`), and the deploy step only *augments* it β€” appending the
read-only data-volume mounts and setting the backup environment β€” just as ingress augments the existing
`nginx` service with `VIRTUAL_HOST_MULTIPORTS`. We do **not** fabricate the service in Python, so its
definition (image, Docker-socket mount, restic cache volume, entrypoint) lives in one place.

Enabling the `backup` master switch causes the `backup-stack` pod to be included in the deployment
automatically (resolved like an implicit extra spec, so the operator does not pass it by hand). The augment
then runs inside the **existing** per-pod service loop, right next to the `VIRTUAL_HOST_MULTIPORTS`
injection (`deployment_create.py:550-574`):

```python
# deploy/deployment_create.py β€” within the `for service_name in services:` loop,
# alongside the VIRTUAL_HOST_MULTIPORTS block (~line 550)

from stack.config.util import get_config_setting

if get_config_setting("backup", False) and service_name == constants.backup_service_name:
    backup_cfg = parsed_spec.get_backup()
    exclude = set(backup_cfg.get("exclude", []))

    # Append a read-only mount for every (non-excluded) data volume to the service the
    # backup-stack composefile already defines. On Docker each named volume is a bind mount
    # under <deployment-dir>/data/<name>/ (`_fixup_pod_file`, line 77), so we mount those host
    # paths directly and avoid re-declaring named volumes across compose files.
    mounts = service_info.setdefault("volumes", [])
    for v in parsed_spec.get_volumes():
        if v not in exclude:
            mounts.append(f"../../data/{v}:/backup/{v}:ro")

    # Consistency-dump hooks: "service:command:ext;...". Executed inside the target container
    # via the Docker socket the backup service already mounts (mirrors K8up's backupcommand).
    pre_hooks = [
        f"{svc}:{c['command']}:{c.get('file_extension', 'dump')}"
        for svc, c in backup_cfg.get("commands", {}).items()
    ]

    svc_env = service_info.get("environment", {})
    add_env_var("BACKUP_S3_ENDPOINT", get_config_setting("backup-s3-endpoint"), svc_env)
    add_env_var("BACKUP_S3_BUCKET", get_config_setting("backup-s3-bucket"), svc_env)
    add_env_var("BACKUP_SCHEDULE", get_config_setting("backup-schedule", "0 3 * * *"), svc_env)
    add_env_var("BACKUP_RETENTION",
                get_config_setting("backup-retention",
                                   "--keep-daily 7 --keep-weekly 4 --keep-monthly 6"), svc_env)
    add_env_var("BACKUP_PRE_HOOKS", ";".join(pre_hooks), svc_env)
    service_info["environment"] = svc_env
```

`constants.backup_service_name` is `"backup"` β€” the service name in `backup-stack/backup/composefile.yml`.
The `restic-password` and S3 credentials are *not* set here: they arrive via the shared `config.env`
(`env_file`) already injected into every service at `deployment_create.py:538-548`, so no new secret path
is introduced.

Notes:
The file /home/david/projects/bpi/stack/docs/backup-implementation.md has been updated successfully. (file state is current in your context β€” no need to Read it back)
Thinking

Let me check the notes that follow still read correctly after the change.

βš™ Read
{
  "file_path": "/home/david/projects/bpi/stack/docs/backup-implementation.md",
  "offset": 151,
  "limit": 35
}
151	  simpler variant is a single `../../data:/backup:ro` mount with restic `--exclude` patterns; either works.
152	- **`restic-password` and the S3 credentials** arrive via the shared `config.env` (`env_file`), which is
153	  how `get_config_setting` values already reach containers β€” no new secret-plumbing path is introduced.
154	- The backup service joins the deployment's default network automatically, so `backup-command` hooks such
155	  as `pg_dump -h db …` resolve the `db` service by name.
156	- The injected service appears in `stack manage … ps` like any other container, which is what the
157	  forthcoming `backup` subcommands will `exec` into.
158	
159	## What this deliberately does *not* do yet
160	
161	- It does not start a restic engine β€” the `bozemanpass/backup` image (its entrypoint, cron loop, hook
162	  runner, and restore command) is the next step and lives in its own repo.
163	- It does not emit anything on the Kubernetes target; that path generates a K8up `Schedule` + annotations
164	  and is a sibling to this function.
165	- It does not add the `stack manage … backup` subcommands.
166	
167	These are intentionally separable: this pass produces a deployment that *declares* its backup intent in a
168	single, inspectable compose file, which is the foundation the remaining pieces build on.
169	
Thinking

Two notes now contradict the refinements (network hooks β†’ docker.sock; and the image now exists as a scaffold). Fixing those.

✏️ Edit backup-implementation.md
/home/david/projects/bpi/stack/docs/backup-implementation.md
βˆ’
- **`restic-password` and the S3 credentials** arrive via the shared `config.env` (`env_file`), which is
  how `get_config_setting` values already reach containers β€” no new secret-plumbing path is introduced.
- The backup service joins the deployment's default network automatically, so `backup-command` hooks such
  as `pg_dump -h db …` resolve the `db` service by name.
- The injected service appears in `stack manage … ps` like any other container, which is what the
  forthcoming `backup` subcommands will `exec` into.
+
- **`restic-password` and the S3 credentials** arrive via the shared `config.env` (`env_file`), which is
  how `get_config_setting` values already reach containers β€” no new secret-plumbing path is introduced.
- **Consistency hooks run via the Docker socket**, which the `backup` service mounts in
  `backup-stack/backup/composefile.yml`. The hook runner `docker exec`s the dump command inside the target
  service container (resolved by compose label), mirroring K8up's exec-into-the-pod model β€” so no database
  clients need to be baked into the backup image.
- The backup service appears in `stack manage … ps` like any other container, which is what the
  forthcoming `backup` subcommands will `exec` into.
The file /home/david/projects/bpi/stack/docs/backup-implementation.md has been updated successfully. (file state is current in your context β€” no need to Read it back)
✏️ Edit backup-implementation.md
/home/david/projects/bpi/stack/docs/backup-implementation.md
βˆ’
## What this deliberately does *not* do yet

- It does not start a restic engine β€” the `bozemanpass/backup` image (its entrypoint, cron loop, hook
  runner, and restore command) is the next step and lives in its own repo.
- It does not emit anything on the Kubernetes target; that path generates a K8up `Schedule` + annotations
  and is a sibling to this function.
- It does not add the `stack manage … backup` subcommands.

These are intentionally separable: this pass produces a deployment that *declares* its backup intent in a
single, inspectable compose file, which is the foundation the remaining pieces build on.
+
## What this deliberately does *not* do yet

- The `bozemanpass/backup` image exists as an **initial scaffold** in the `backup-stack` repo (its
  `Containerfile`, `build.sh`, and `scripts/` for entrypoint, cron, hook runner, and restore) but has not
  been run end-to-end and is not yet wired into a build.
- The deploy-time augment above is **not yet implemented in code** β€” this document is still the spec for it.
- It does not emit anything on the Kubernetes target; that path generates a K8up `Schedule` + annotations
  and is a sibling to this function.
- It does not add the `stack manage … backup` subcommands.

These are intentionally separable: this pass produces a deployment whose `backup` service *declares* its
backup intent (its `:ro` data mounts and env) in the generated compose, which is the foundation the
remaining pieces build on.
The file /home/david/projects/bpi/stack/docs/backup-implementation.md has been updated successfully. (file state is current in your context β€” no need to Read it back)
Thinking

Done. The backup-stack repo is scaffolded and the stack-tool design docs are aligned with it.

What's in ../backup-stack

backup-stack/
β”œβ”€β”€ README.md                              # updated: status, layout, modes, config
β”œβ”€β”€ stacks/backup/stack.yml                # declares container + pod
β”œβ”€β”€ backup/composefile.yml                 # canonical `backup` service (docker.sock + restic cache)
└── containers/backup/
    β”œβ”€β”€ Containerfile                       # alpine + restic + docker-cli + cron
    β”œβ”€β”€ build.sh                            # tags bozemanpass/backup:stack
    └── scripts/
        β”œβ”€β”€ docker-entrypoint.sh            # modes: schedule|backup|restore|prune|check
        β”œβ”€β”€ lib.sh                          # restic repo/env setup, refuses to run w/o encryption key
        β”œβ”€β”€ backup.sh                       # hooks β†’ restic backup β†’ retention
        β”œβ”€β”€ run-hooks.sh                    # docker exec consistency dumps into target containers
        β”œβ”€β”€ prune.sh                        # restic forget --prune
        └── restore.sh                      # restic restore into rw volumes

All seven shell scripts pass bash -n syntax checks. I followed the authoritative docs/stack-files.md convention and used an explicit path: ./containers/backup in stack.yml to sidestep the name→dir inference your DBDB comments flag as unreliable.

Two refinements baked in during scaffolding

  1. Consistency hooks run via the Docker socket (the backup service mounts it, like nginx-proxy does), docker exec-ing the dump command inside the target container β€” mirroring K8up's exec-into-pod model. This keeps DB clients out of the backup image.
  2. Augment, don't fabricate. The canonical backup service now lives in backup-stack/backup/composefile.yml; the deploy-time pass only appends :ro mounts + env to it β€” exactly how ingress augments the nginx service. I updated docs/backup-implementation.md Β§3 accordingly (and fixed the stale network-hook and "image doesn't exist yet" notes).

Honest status

  • The scripts are syntax-checked but not run end-to-end β€” no restic/S3/Docker exercise happened here. README and the impl doc both say so.
  • The image isn't built yet, and the stack-tool injection code isn't written (still spec-only).
  • I did not commit/push β€” the files are staged in the working tree for your review.

Suggested next step

The highest-value thing to verify first is the build wiring: stack fetch repo bozemanpass/backup-stack β†’ stack prepare --stack backup actually locating containers/backup/build.sh and producing bozemanpass/backup:stack. That's the one piece dependent on the external-repo build path you've noted is shaky, and everything else assumes it works. Want me to trace that resolution against build_containers.py to confirm the explicit-path form hits a working code path before you try it β€” or commit the scaffold first?